I wouldn't call this important, as it's not a critical package or anything. I would make it a normal or even minor severity bug.
Andrew Donnellan On 5/21/05, Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please consider faqomatic_2.721-6 for inclusion in sarge, in lieu of > 2.721-4, which is currently frozen in testing. > > The freeze anouncement said that changes would be accepted into > testing if they meet these criteria: > > - fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: > optional or extra, only when this can be done via unstable > > - documentation fixes > > - translation updates > > > 2.721-5 satisfies the first and second conditions, here is the > changelog: > > * Extended the maintenace job setup to accomodate multiple FOMs. > (closes: #303178). > * Extended README.Debian to explain how to setup multiple FOMs. > * Added NEWS.Debian. > > 303178 was tagged with severity `important' by the originial submitter > and faqomatic is an optional package. I would really like to see this > fix included in sarge, without it, you can't run multiple FOM's. > > 2.721-6 satisfies the third, it's simply the Czech debconf translation > that I recieved a few days ago. Changelog: > > * Added Czech debconf translation, (thanks Miroslav Kure; closes: > #308060). > > My sponsor was kind enough to upload to unstable. Thanks for your > consideration. > > -- > Jereme Corrado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Heritage Linux Group http://www.heritagelinux.tk
