Re: request NMU on jadetex (impacts tiff transition)

2004-08-10 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Whoops. Sorry, I missed this problem. I'll try to fix it shortly. Can the person working the NMU please send me patches directly first? -- ...Adam Di Carlo...<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

coordinating b-f 3.0.23 release

2002-05-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
, and build the powerpc version.... -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

3.0 and boot-floppies

2002-05-06 Thread Adam Di Carlo
e on 3.0.23 for 3.0 release. Anyhow, please let me know. I hesitate to build/upload this because I worry whether uploading it will mess up your woody release plans. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

boot-floppies status

2001-12-25 Thread Adam Di Carlo
o woody which are not there yet (busybox, python2.1-xml, libnewt0, whiptail) so that the package can be built from woody. If you have comments, suggestions, etc, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have some tunnel vision right now and am not really reading other lists at this time. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

boot-floppies 3.0.19 and priorities

2001-12-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
first. If anyone else can take a whack at the others and any other bugs they can close that would be good. John was working on 123926, I know. I would like to release 3.0.19 shortly, just to get in the habit of quick short releases, e.g., this week. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

packages in unstable we need for b-f

2001-12-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
t strictly needed for boot-floppies (might be nice): ash (0.3.8-29 vs 0.3.8-32) base-config (1.33 vs 1.33.3, i18n updates and such slang1 -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

boot-floppies needs some stuff from unstable in woody

2001-11-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
so we can deal with it. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

[Ethan Benson ] Re: is it too late for 2.2.26 powerpc boot-floppies and r4

2001-11-17 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I dunno if you guys are considering r5 ? This might be due cause. --- Begin Message --- On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:13:25AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > don't really have the capability or the time to attempt that. &g

Re: b-f 3.0.16 preparing

2001-10-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
now do not have an installable combination of kernel-image-2.2.19 and pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 (and flavors). Archive maintainers, please be aware of this. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r4

2001-10-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Welll, I'm in pretty good shape to build a new Potato boot-floppies (i386) and it wouldn't be that much of a distraction, if it is decided that I should. Just let me know. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

boot-floppies 3.0.15

2001-10-16 Thread Adam Di Carlo
appear on the top of the main menu. We use more busybox utilities, saving space (ifconfig/route). There have been numerous translation updates, documentation updates, porting improvements (s390 in particular) and build fixes. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: Preparation of Debian GNU/Linux 2.2r4

2001-10-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
epci > and the like sufficient? Herbert has mail. Since we build with kernel-image-2.2.19* for i386, we need the PCMCIA mdoules that go with that exact kernel as well. That is perhaps the reason. -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/>

boot-floppies 3.0.13

2001-08-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Quick turn-around, but how can that hurt, eh? -- ...Adam Di Carlo..<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...http://www.onshored.com/> boot-floppies (3.0.13) unstable; urgency=low * Christian T. Steigies - m68k builds with libc 2.2.4 * Eduard Bloch: - i386 flavor shows up on rescue disk to

Re: basedebs.tgz

2001-08-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
ait until someone else has done all the testing? Please use the debian-testing list. This list here is for the coordination of release efforts, not for testing. Regarding basedebs.tgz, I imagine the debootstrap maintainer is planning to provide it, but I don't know. -- ...Adam

Re: Base System release critical bug status III

2001-08-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > Currently open RC bugs against base packages are: (by source package) I wonder if it would be possible to include packages we use for the root disk: busybox, kernel-image-*, pcmcia-*, dhcp-client... -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: pcmcia modules for powerpc not available

2001-08-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's not in unstable or testing. Eek. How'd that happen?? I would guess pcmcic-cs was forced from unstable into testing, causing the older pcmcia-modules dpeneding on the older pcmcia-cs to be booted. > I'll try to un-lag it later this week. Exc

Re: pcmcia modules for powerpc not available

2001-08-06 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin 230508 Apr 13 14:42 > pcmcia-cs_3.1.22-0.2potato_powerpc.deb > -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin 411342 Apr 13 14:42 > pcmcia-modules-2.2.19-pmac_3.1.22-0.2potatok1_powerpc.deb > > What do you think is missi

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.8!

2001-07-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 3.0.7 (and a prerelease CVS 3.0.8) for m68k have been available for some > time, but not in the archive, since I had little luck with it. Others had > more luck with 3.0.8, so I guess I can upload that once I've finished the > release version.

Re: boot-floppies 3.0.8!

2001-07-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > Could someone (David? Adam?) please do what's necessary to tag > boot-floppies 3.0.8, for initial ia64 and basedebs support? 3.0.8 source is uploaded. We're building i386 binary now. > There's still no i386 pcmcia-modules that can be used on > boot-floppies! Could someon

Re: Debian 3.0 (woody) Freeze Begins

2001-07-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While I may not be too concerned one way or another about the name of the > next release, I do have some ideas about how it might be good to handle > the next release. My overriding goal for this release was to manage to > get a short, controllable freeze

some packages needing to be crammed into woody

2001-07-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
The following packages should be updated in woody as base freeze candidates. This will help testing as well, since it will be a more accurate testing environ. debootstrap base-config quik There are problably more, not sure... -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

debian install system approach

2001-06-25 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > Anyway, the logic isn't backwards, it's just looking more at getting > things right in the future than at the moment. In particular, for > future releases we need to get in the habit of always having working > boot-floppies, even when we're not expecting a freeze for some

2.3.6 uploaded

2001-06-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Boot-floppies 2.3.6 for i386, powerpc, and source, has been uploaded. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: 2.3.6 report

2001-06-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 05:07:04PM -0700, David Whedon wrote: > > All in all the errors are mostly cosmetic. I hope we move to quickly freeze > > base because boot-floppies are ready for it. > > That's not going to happen particularly quickly, because -testing *isn't* >

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we could change the bf-archive install script a little, the amount of > files uploaded could be significantly reduced without loosing anything. > Currently we build [amiga|atari|mac|*vme*]install.tar.gz files so that > potential users have t

2.2.26 (potato) tagged and building

2001-06-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Boot-floppies 2.2.26 update is tagged and buiding for i386 now. It had some PowerPC updates, but the main reason for this release is to get the kernel 2.2.19 4potato.2. Here are the packages I am building with from potato-proposed-updates: -rw-r--r--1 apharris staff 185934 Jun 7 01:

boot-floppies 2.3.5 ready for testing (i386 and powerpc so far)

2001-06-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
n Owsiany: - making sure that i18n code is included, moving over to stuff moved from CVS to their own packages * Adam Di Carlo - the logic to build a modules tarball for given root disk was a little messed up on non-i386, partly due to some schizophrenia in either rootdis

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I built a busybox with Richards patch, rebuilt bf (well, it hangup sometime, > must be a local problem, but I got a new root.bin) and booting with the new > root.bin works fine on my amiga. I did not get far in the installation > (base.tar.gz i

Re: kernel-source 2.2.19-5 for potato

2001-06-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm in the process of uploading kernel-source 2.2.19-5 to potato, which > contains patches that were forwarded to me by Wichert Akkerman. These > patches fix a /tmp core dump attack as well as a sparc64 specific exec > bug that is identical to the one fixe

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > ROOTCMD := $(shell [ d -u = 0 ] || echo sudo) > > > Guess it will fail when I build as root, and no sudo is installed. >

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it? > > > > If you are sending patches to this need that need apply

boot-floppies 2.2.5 (potato) ready for testing

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Boot-Floppies 2.2.25 for Potato i386 has been built and I would like to get some testing on it. It is available at http://people.debian.org/~aph/debian/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.25-2001-07-07/ Please keep in mind that we are working almost solely on woody now, so I'm really only intereste

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it? If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please make it very clear, perhaps with subject of [APPLY PATCH PLS]. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Ok. I am not moving i386 to straigh 2.2.19 right now, btw, since I'm > > pretty sure that kernel has issues. > > What kind of issues are you referring to? I checked and they are

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My build runs for 519 minutes, then fails with: > > dh_builddeb -i > dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 > package `boot-floppies': > `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `zlib-bin' > dh_builddeb:

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Someone is confusing Build-Depends syntax with Depends syntax there. > You can't put arch-specifiers in a normal Depends line. You're right, my bad. *blush* Seems to be fixed now anyhow. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This > > is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working

2.2.25 tagged and building (was Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?)

2001-06-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > Not right now, I expect we'll need updated kernel packages soon. > > Ok, forget about that. Yes, new package would be nice ;) Ok, building 2.2.25 for i386 and source upload now. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: no alpha boot-floppies

2001-06-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > Nobody is working on Alpha boot floppies for Woody at the moment. > > This is a bad situation. Unless alpha porters start working on > > getting things going for their architecture, won&#

m68k boot-floppies for woody

2001-06-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't have an install system and m68k will not be able to participate in the Woody release? -- .Ada

no alpha boot-floppies

2001-06-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Nobody is working on Alpha boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This is a bad situation. Unless alpha porters start working on getting things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't have boot-floppies and Alpha will not be able to participate in the Woody release? -- .Adam

boot-floppy short-term status

2001-05-28 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I am preparing boot-floppies 2.3.4 for release. This version should be nominally installable, or at least, get beyond the blocker bugs in 2.3.3, such as busybox issues causing failed download of base. There are still *plenty* of problem in boot-floppies making it not production ready, including:

Re: non-vanilla i386 kernels botched in 2.2r3

2001-05-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My experience of the 2.2.19 kernels is that they are still unsuitable > > for building. I will research more so I can more demonstrations of > > this. > > Please do so. Hmm, I compared all the config files and they seem fine. My apologies. Nice work.

Re: potato: kernel removal and 2.2.19 for i386

2001-05-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > No way to use 2.2.19 for boot-floppies update for Potato, there are no > > > PCMCIA for it. > >

Re: potato: kernel removal and 2.2.19 for i386

2001-05-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No way to use 2.2.19 for boot-floppies update for Potato, there are no > > PCMCIA for it. > > PCMCIA modules have been compiled for 2.2.19. They've been around for

potato b-f 2.2.24 testing/building

2001-05-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I should be able to release 2.2.24 tomorrow -- I'm not testing that it builds and all that, then I'll tag it and build from exported sources tomorrow. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: non-vanilla i386 kernels botched in 2.2r3

2001-05-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just found out through a bug report that all the flavoured 2.2.19-2 > kernels did not have the flavour set when make-kpkg build was being called. > This means that they will *not* work out of the box. > > A fixed version is being built right now. > >

potato: kernel removal and 2.2.19 for i386

2001-05-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
While I like the idea of removing old kernels from the Potato (and woody) archives, I object to some of the removals. Here are my arguments: No way to use 2.2.19 for boot-floppies update for Potato, there are no PCMCIA for it. Moreover, I think 2.2.19 has some serious problems, although I need

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? > > Yes please. Ok. I am not moving i386 to straigh 2.2.19 right now, btw, since I'm pretty sure that kernel has issues. I can do a 2.2.25 with that shortly, however, for testi

Re: should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:01:28AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > > > Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? > > > > Targetting which distribu

should burn new potato b-f for ARM?

2001-05-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Should I do a source upload of 2.2.24 boot-floppies for the ARM stuff? Anything else that needs to go into that, like the 2.2.19 kernel for i386? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: [2.2r3] Status report

2001-04-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wookey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun 15 Apr, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > m68k and arm won't appear soon, nobody cares about alpha, > > > so only powerpc is missing at the moment.

Re: Status of boot-floppies

2001-04-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo
* Phil Blundell: - bump ARM kernel to 2.2.19 -- Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 14 Apr 2001 20:02:35 -0400

Re: [2.2r3] Status report

2001-04-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is a short status: > > 1. boot-floppies for powerpc are promised but still missing. BenC > has uploaded a set for sparc, so we have ia32 and sparc right > now. That must be a typo -- i386 you mean. > m68k and arm won't appear s

Re: Pre-final installation commands for 2.2r3

2001-04-13 Thread Adam Di Carlo
What about boot-floppies? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: 2.2r3 and boot-floppies

2001-04-10 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 04:32:27PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I don't think all ports have rebuilt yet. PowerPC seems to have > > serious kernel troubles. > > its a misconfiguration, sysrq is turned on and this happ

Re: Bug#90967: proposed fix

2001-04-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But there are a couple of factors arguing for its inclusion. > First, I've confirmed this device information in three places: the > kernel's Documentation/devices.txt, /usr/include/linux/major.h, > and MAKEDEV. I've also split out the is_drive code and tes

boot-floppies 2.2.22 released

2001-04-04 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I've released boot-floppies 2.2.22 and uploaded that to samosa (will be in Incoming soon I'm sure). Changelog is below. The major change is 2.2.19pre17 kernels and modules on i386, as well as other updates from potato-proposed-updates. It's up to you guys if you wanna use this for 2.2r3 or wai

Re: still not out of the woods with idepci / compact kernels

2001-04-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, my bad. I'll have fixed versions uploaded this evening if > all goes well. Ok, I note that you have that done at http://people.debian.org/~dwhedon/>. Could you go ahead an upload that to Incoming, as well as the pcmcia stuff you have there, whic

[David Whedon ] Re: still not out of the woods with idepci / compact kernels

2001-04-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
FYI. --- Begin Message --- The below problem is fixed. The only problem now is an aesthetic one. The compact and idepci kernels attempt to draw a framebuffer penguin logo at boot. The 2.2.19pre17 version has a messed up color map for me (I tried the 2.2.17-idepci kernel and the color map was f

still not out of the woods with idepci / compact kernels

2001-04-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
The idepci and compact kernels have a critical problem: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:glibc> dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile \ /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/k/kernel-image-2.2.19pre17-idepci/kernel-image-2.2.19pre17-idepci_2.2.19pre17-2_i386.deb \ | tar -tvf - | grep modules | head -5 drwxr-xr-x root/roo

pkgs from potato proposed updates used to build bf 2.2.22

2001-04-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Someone please review this list of packages from potato-proposed-updates I am using to build 2.2.22 with: e2fsprogs_1.18-3.0potato1_i386.deb kernel-image-2.2.19pre17-compact_2.2.19pre17-1_i386.deb kernel-image-2.2.19pre17-ide_2.2.19pre17-1_i386.deb kernel-image-2.2.19pre17-idepci_2.2.19pre17-1_i3

kernels and pcmcia modules sync

2001-04-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
an Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debian-boot mailing list Subject: Re: Kernel for woody Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mail-Followup-To: Brian Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Debia

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-04-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Still waiting for the pcmcia packages... > > They should be there now.. Can you tell me exactly (host/path please!) where they are? I'm using David Wheadon's non-uploaded ver

Re: To Do for 2.2r3

2001-03-31 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess you got me wrong. I had my reservations because boot-floppies > doesn't seem to be available for a while and thus are not very well > tested, no? Well, I had pre-release testing versions around for quite a while. > Since r1 or r2 got quite so

Re: To Do for 2.2r3

2001-03-26 Thread Adam Di Carlo
"J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should definately be fixed. And if 2.2.21 isn't well-tested enough, please > make an updated 2.2.20 with only this patch applied. Ahem! No, that won't be happening, at least, not by me. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: To Do for 2.2r3

2001-03-26 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > * libc6 -18 for alpha, arm, i386, powerpc (already there for m68k > and sparc) > > * updated kernel / pcmcia stuff? > > * updated boot-floppies? Joey (Martin Schulz) seems to think the boot-floppies 2.2.21 don't have the testing to go into 2.2r

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please use libc 2.1.3-18 instead, it fixes an interesting ldd bug. Um, I don't see this built for i386 yet. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

Re: packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please use libc 2.1.3-18 instead, it fixes an interesting ldd bug. Oh! Oops! Ok, I'll fix this for my next build. Still waiting for the pcmcia packages... -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>

packages from potato-proposed-updates used in 2.2.21 bf

2001-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
FYI, I used the following packages (and only the following packages) from Potato proposed updates when building 2.2.21. Let me know if I am missing any. -rw-r--r--1 apharris staff 2164106 Jan 23 17:30 libc6-dev_2.1.3-17_i386.deb -rw-r--r--1 apharris staff 670676 Jan 23 17:27 l

Re: Lithuanian XKB keymap for potato rev.3

2001-03-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Mantas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are no lithuanian keymap for XFree 3.3.6 in potato rev.2. I > would like you to include it in potato rev.3. I have working keymap > and I can send it to you (it should be included in xlib6g > 3.3.6). Lithuanian users has many lithuanisation related proble

Re: boot-floppies 2.2.21 released

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 02:47:28AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > I decided to release and upload 2.2.21 even though we know we're going > > to want to do a boot-floppies 2.2.22 for i386 at least for newer >

boot-floppies 2.2.21 released

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I decided to release and upload 2.2.21 even though we know we're going to want to do a boot-floppies 2.2.22 for i386 at least for newer 2.2.19pre17 kernels. Please test this out. It's probably most convenient to grab it from http://people.debian.org/~aph/current/>. I'm really only considering c

Re: boot-floppies progress

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would really rather someone fix this, even at the cost of delaying > boot floppies further. 2.2.19pre17 is a significant security upgrade. I'll happily rebuild when those are provided. Be aware that in at least 40% of the cases where there's a n

Re: boot-floppies progress

2001-03-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Woah, that's Really Bad, 2.2.18pre21 has security holes and some nasty > bugs (e.g. MegaRAID incompatibility). What's the problem with pcmcia > modules? There is no package for pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17-{compact,idepci} packages. For any kernel to be u

boot-floppies progress

2001-03-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I apologize for my recent lack of involvement in boot-floppies maintenance. I have been allowing myself the rather guilty pleasure of working through the new policy of Debian SGML/XML stuff. Which is a whole lot more fun for me than boot-floppies hacking. Anyhow, I'm right now going to tag/relea

kernel-image-2.2.19pre13 for 2.2r3?

2001-02-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Are we going to go for kernel-image-2.2.19pre13 for 2.2r3? I don't see any compiled images for i386 for that, only kernel-image-2.2.19pre11. Is that good enough for non-alpha platforms? Or should I just stick with 2.2.18 ? (I gather not...) -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.

Re: Packages for using kernel 2.4.x with potato

2001-02-17 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ok, I've added this to http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/ : Unofficial Linux Kernel 2.4 Support Adrian Bunk has provided a set of packages for i386 Potato systems which provide compatability for Linux Kernel 2.4.x. Please read http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html";> http://www.fs.tum.

Re: Packages for using kernel 2.4.x with potato

2001-02-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since it seems noone has already done this: I'll set up an apt-able > archive with _all_ the packages someone might need when upgrading the > kernel to 2.4.x . I hope I'll have it ready till Tuesday. Let me know when it's there and I can put a mention in

Re: Latest version of installation documentation ?

2001-01-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Marc SCHAEFER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The fix is: >boot-floppies/debian/changelog > line 74, incorrect syntax Oh, the changelog wasn't finalized. Fixed in CVS. > I have temporarily fixed it by putting my name and 822-date. I guess it is > done automatically at release time. Now

Re: new libc6 for potato is broken ? (was Re: Uploads to proposed-updates)

2001-01-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 06:49:17PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > It seems to me this libc6 stuff isn't well tested and shoudl not be > > installed into

boot-floppies woody branch created

2001-01-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I've created the woody branch for the boot-floppies. It's a little unusual to use a branch for this, since it's ultimately going to be the mainline, but for now, I figured it would be best not to disrupt the translators and porters. The branch is simply called woody. To update a checked out cop

new libc6 for potato is broken ? (was Re: Uploads to proposed-updates)

2001-01-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > --- glibc_2.1.3-17_i386.changes Boot floppies won't compile with these changes. gcc -Wall -Os -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -D_GNU_SOURCE -DBB_VER='"0.43"' -DBB_BT='"2001.01.23-23:34+"' -c -o nfsmoun\ t.o nfsmount.c In file included from /usr

Re: Latest version of installation documentation ?

2001-01-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Marc SCHAEFER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just did an update of the CVS boot-floppies, and I have now made the PDF > for the installation guides (especially the French, English and German > versions interest me). > > Can I be sure that these are mostly the latest version ? Or are those > doc

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-21 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You are still planning on waiting till after branching for woody > before expecting the busybox changes we discussed, right? Oh, no I'm not really waiting for you (nor you for me, I hope) -- I just haven't had time to work on bf for a bit --

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Two questions: > > - I understand it right: You can't use a modular 2.0 kernel with the > > latest modutils? > > Right. > > > - Shall I create an apt-able archive with the packages needed for kernel > > 2.4 reco

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-16 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IIRC realplayer is orphaned. I don't this so: -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin10924 Dec 31 17:49 /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/contrib/r/realplayer/realplayer_8.0.tar.gz > > How's the way we cope with this kinda issue in the BTS -- "stuff fixed >

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-16 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Brian Frederick Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anthony Towns wrote: > > > I suspect we won't make the end of Jan, but we may as well try for it. > > You may want to include realplayer from unstable; the one in stable is > no longer usable. If this is so, shouldn't someone file a bug and

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-16 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > I suspect we won't make the end of Jan, but we may as well try for it. Yeah, my point. I need to move on really soon to woody, personally. > Anyone have any worthwhile opinions on how 2.2r3 and 2.4.0 should get > along? There already seems to be an iptables package and

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Is there any agreement from the release manager on my project to get 2.2r3 out? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's our time frame here? I need to verify that 2.2.18 fixes the > current PowerPC installation brown bag. I dunno. I'd like to get it all taken care of by end of month, does that sound reasonable? I personally only have a few more tasks I wann

Re: 2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also just uploaded a new base-config for stable, which will need > porting. Scratch that, I changed my mind and removed this package from incoming. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>

2.2r3 preparation

2001-01-11 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Well, I have 2.2r3 pretty much ready to ship on the boot-floppies side. I'm hoping we can get the preparation done so we're ready to go. The only thing in proposed updates that looks relevant to me is the new kernels, 2.2.18 (rather than the pre21 version). Clearly we need the PCMCIA stuff and

Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2001-01-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > Well, I have no complaints if you get things done earlier, of course :) We'll try. I'm trying to get final Potato bf out. I think they are pretty much ready but we need some new kernels to fix some problems. > I'd presume we'd ship with 2.2.x on the boot floppies and a

Re: disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2000-12-30 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The current busybox.deb needs a little work (about 1 hour) before it > will be ready to replace the one in boot-floppies. Mostly, I need > to go through and turn off everything that isn't enabled in the > boot-floppies CVS. Also, some of the choices re

disposition of boot-floppies in woody

2000-12-30 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns claimed on debian-devel that it would take us "a few months" to prepare boot-floppies for woody. I think it can be done by Feb. I don't think there many major issues. Here's the one's I know of: - use busybox.deb from woody rather than the local CVS copy - dealing with new k

please give me woody target freeze date

2000-12-02 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I absolutely need to know when the release manager is hoping to freeze woody, as the boot-floppies maintainer. That's because I'm going to need at least 6 weeks notice. Please let me know -- privately, if necessary, so not as to publicize the information. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]htt

Re: *Final* 2.2r2 Update List

2000-12-01 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Anthony Towns writes: > # auric incoming: [...] > install > incoming/pcmcia-modules-2.2.18pre21-ide_3.1.22-0.1potato.0.1k1_i386.changes > install > incoming/pcmcia-modules-2.2.18pre21_3.1.22-0.1potato.0.1k1_i386.changes > install incoming/slocate_2.4-1_arm.changes > > # boot-floppies, kernels

boot-floppies 2.2.20.0.1 i386 uploaded

2000-11-30 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I've uploaded the new set of boot-floppies targetted for 2.2r2 to samosa, which should propogate over shortly. The PCMCIA modules problems on the vanilla flavor are fixed. I tested vanilla and compact flavors and all is well there. The boot-floppies are numbered with a binary NMU recompile nu

boot-floppies 2.2.20 i386 uploaded

2000-11-29 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ok, despite the problems in building fixed after 2.2.20, and despite some persistent pcmcia modules problems, I'm uploading 2.2.20 i386. I can do another binary upload with a new pcmcia-modules set if it's supplied. My guess is that the following PCMCIA cards will be broken on the vanilla set of

  1   2   3   >