Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While I may not be too concerned one way or another about the name of the > next release, I do have some ideas about how it might be good to handle > the next release. My overriding goal for this release was to manage to > get a short, controllable freeze; one that we can get over and done with > in a few months, rather than letting it drag on for seven months with no > end in sight, but this came at a cost of letting the development cycle > go on for quite a while: ten and a half months, as it turned out. For > the next cycle (assuming this freeze actually turns out to be relatively > short and controlled), I think it would be interesting to see if we can > do the same thing again, with a short (2 or 3 month) development cycle, > for a 5 to 7 month release cycle.
I think it woudl be great if we could. But obviously we'd need to have a ready installation system right in november for post-woody, that is, debian-installer. Have you asked Joey Hess when he projects it will be feature complete and ready for testing phase? -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
