Bug#1095511: transition: netcdf

On 2/14/25 6:41 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: On 2/14/25 11:49 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Go ahead. Thanks. netcdf (1:4.9.3-1) has been uploaded to unstable, and is now built & installed on all release architectures. It has already migrated to testing, the binNMUs still need to be

Bug#1096090: transition: ppp

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: p...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:ppp User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello Release Team friends, I have uploaded ppp 2.5.2-1+1~exp1 to experimental today, and have been testing it locall

Processed: transition: ppp

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:ppp Bug #1096090 [release.debian.org] transition: ppp Added indication that 1096090 affects src:ppp -- 1096090: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096090 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1096031: marked as done (nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1)

Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:57:32 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1096031: nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1096031, regarding nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#1088624: transition: apt

I'm ready to go. I have completed all reverse dependency rebuilds and patches. The following sourceful changes are needed: * packagekit (co-maintainer, will upload, prepared in Salsa) * aptitude (team maintainer, will upload, prepared in Salsa) * python-apt (maintainer, will upload, prepared i

Bug#1092709: transition: taglib

Hi, On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 20:52:16 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed I believe that this transition is now all done, with old binary packages removed from Testing already. Thanks, Boyuan Yang > On 10/01/2025 20:13, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Package: release.debian.o

Bug#1095266: transition: dcmtk

Greetings, Current status is the following. Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-15: > * The following 1 is pending resolution of #1096017: > > - orthanc Sébastien Jodogne fixed the issue (Thanks!). > * The following 8 depend on #1096017 to be fixed in orthanc > before statusing further: >

Bug#1088624: transition: apt

On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 02:27:25PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 07:52:06PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@packages.debian.org > > Control: affects -1 + src:apt > > User: release.debian@

Bug#1096036: transition: coq 8.20.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: jpu...@debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers A new upstream version of Coq is out ; it requires rebuilding all depending packages, and updating some of them (se

Processed: nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:haskell-gi-pango Bug #1096031 [release.debian.org] nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1 Added indication that 1096031 affects src:haskell-gi-pango -- 1096031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096031 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow

Bug#1096031: nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: haskell-gi-pa...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:haskell-gi-pango User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1 . ANY -i386 . sid . -m "Rebuild with libpango-1.0-0=1.56.1 Pango

Bug#1095266: transition: dcmtk

Greetings from Debian Med Sprint at Berlin, Out of the 15 packages that regressed with the newer dcmtk 3.6.9, I found out that: * The following 1 is pending resolution of #1096017: - orthanc * The following 8 depend on #1096017 to be fixed in orthanc before statusing further: -

Re: Building packages in the future.

On Sun, Jan 05, 2025 at 11:58:40PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > Maybe you can consider using a time namespace (unshare -T) and > change the system date/time in that namespace. As those jobs already run in throw away VM, just change the system time. You have to change it back to be able to ta

Re: Building packages in the future.

El 15/2/25 a las 10:44, Paul Gevers escribió: Can the Release Managers suggest a calendar for raising those bugs, first to important, then to serious? What I had in mind was that you'd file the bugs and after some time (say, one or two months) raised them, giving maintainers a bit more time th

Re: Building packages in the future.

Hi Santiago Sorry for dropping the ball on this. On 05-01-2025 17:56, Santiago Vila wrote: I was told that it was ok to consider those bugs as "RC for trixie" but I was also requested to be nice when reporting those bugs, so I have been reporting them as severity:normal (except when the future

Re: Status for RT on `Rules-Requires-Root: no` transition

Hi Niels, On 14-01-2025 10:46, Niels Thykier wrote: Another update on the transition One month further. What's the current status? Paul PS: I happen to track wordpress, which happened to be dropped from trixie because of this transition (it's on its way back). It's exactly those kind of re

Processed: nmu: mumudvb_1.7.1-1

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:mumudvb Bug #1096014 [release.debian.org] nmu: mumudvb_1.7.1-1 Added indication that 1096014 affects src:mumudvb -- 1096014: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096014 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pro

Bug#1096014: nmu: mumudvb_1.7.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: mumu...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:mumudvb User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu mumudvb_1.7.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to loose transitive build dependency on makedev" I have verifi