Hi Santiago Sorry for dropping the ball on this.
On 05-01-2025 17:56, Santiago Vila wrote:
I was told that it was ok to consider those bugs as "RC for trixie" but I was also requested to be nice when reporting those bugs, so I have been reporting them as severity:normal (except when the future suddenly arrives, like the few ones that started to fail on 2025-01-01). Can the Release Managers suggest a calendar for raising those bugs, first to important, then to serious?
What I had in mind was that you'd file the bugs and after some time (say, one or two months) raised them, giving maintainers a bit more time than usual to react to this novel class of RC bugs as you've now started to actively test. I consider these bugs RC as they will exhibit themselves as FTBFS during the stable release support period. So I suggest you mark these bugs as RC now, such that they can get fixed in time for the trixie release.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
