Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:57:32 +0100
with message-id <z7dxrh7d9vdmv...@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1096031: nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1096031,
regarding nmu: haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1096031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1096031
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: haskell-gi-pa...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:haskell-gi-pango
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1 . ANY -i386 . sid . -m "Rebuild with
libpango-1.0-0=1.56.1
Pango 1.56 added new methods which fails introspection using the current
libghc-gi-pango-dev. Skipping rebuild for i386 as it was already
binNMU'ed after libpango-1.0-0=1.56.1-1 was uploaded to sid
--
Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-02-15 14:50:18 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: haskell-gi-pa...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:haskell-gi-pango
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu haskell-gi-pango_1.0.30-1 . ANY -i386 . sid . -m "Rebuild with
> libpango-1.0-0=1.56.1
>
> Pango 1.56 added new methods which fails introspection using the current
> libghc-gi-pango-dev. Skipping rebuild for i386 as it was already
> binNMU'ed after libpango-1.0-0=1.56.1-1 was uploaded to sid
Scheduled
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
