Hey Adam,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 08:52:20PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
>Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
>Hi,
>
>On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 02:54 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'd like to upload a stable update for efivar, with two (sets of)
>> fixes backported from upstream.
>>
>> * Firstly, there'
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #975425 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package efivar/32-2+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
975425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi,
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 02:54 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'd like to upload a stable update for efivar, with two (sets of)
> fixes backported from upstream.
>
> * Firstly, there's a simple initialisation fix to fix some possible
>crashes.
>
> * Secondly,
On 2020-11-24 20:18:15 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> That would be preferable at this point, yes, sorry. We should try and
> make sure it's sorted soon afterwards though, to avoid things getting
> stuck again.
I will set up an alarm on my side :)
> At some point, could we please have a combin
Hi,
On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 15:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-11-21 at 14:04 +0100, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> > I hope this is the file you missed.
>
> Well, yes and no. That looks more like the diff between the current
> package in unstable and what you're proposing to upload, w
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:17 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > Well, my point was more that we already have buster > unstable, and
> > that I was assuming you'd fix that by uploading a package to
> > unstable, rather than an even newer package to buster. :-)
>
> As MariaDB 10.5 is already in unstab
> Well, my point was more that we already have buster > unstable, and
> that I was assuming you'd fix that by uploading a package to unstable,
> rather than an even newer package to buster. :-)
As MariaDB 10.5 is already in unstable, it is in practice impossible
to do any 10.3 uploads to unstable
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 21:04 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-11-20 17:24:30 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Predictably we're again quite close to a point release. :-( (One
> > week from freeze, specifically.)
>
> oh.
In fairness, given an approximately two month cycle, we're
Hello!
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 21:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
..
> I see there's a mariadb-10.3 update in experimental (for 10.3.27).
> Based on the above, I assume that an upload to unstable is also
> planned?
No, that was an experiment which turned out to be a very stupid one
and I will no pursu
On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 22:02 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 21:08, Adam D. Barratt <
> a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> mariadb-10.3 is one of the packages that I was looking at in
> > relation to the upcoming stable point release (in a week and a
> > bit's time
On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 16:48 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> > If you want to keep src:mariadb-10.3 around, one or the other. Or
> > you could upload a new version of mariadb-10.3 which drops the
> > package.
>
> Ok, I will upload a new 10.3. I want it to stay around for a bit more
> until the tran
I have replied to #975082 with the patch, as requested.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
