On Sun, 2020-11-22 at 16:48 +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > If you want to keep src:mariadb-10.3 around, one or the other. Or > > you could upload a new version of mariadb-10.3 which drops the > > package. > > Ok, I will upload a new 10.3. I want it to stay around for a bit more > until the transition of 10.5 is fully completed and verified to > replace 10.3 in full. Testing in unstable alone has not given 10.5 > enough exposure yet, as there have been very few bug reports.
I see there's a mariadb-10.3 update in experimental (for 10.3.27). Based on the above, I assume that an upload to unstable is also planned? mariadb-10.3 is one of the packages that I was looking at in relation to the upcoming stable point release (in a week and a bit's time), because the versions currently look like: mariadb-10.3 | 1:10.3.23-0+deb10u1 | stable | source mariadb-10.3 | 1:10.3.24-2 | testing | source mariadb-10.3 | 1:10.3.24-2 | unstable | source mariadb-10.3 | 1:10.3.25-0+deb10u1 | proposed-updates | source so, without a new unstable upload, we either have to not include the mariadb-10.3 DSA packages in the point release, or copy them to testing and unstable beforehand. Not having to do either of those would be preferable from the SRM perspective, and I assume also from the maintainer perspective. Regards, Adam
