Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 23:29 +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Scidavis hardly relies on Qt4 and its Qt3 compatibility facilities.
> It still uses an obsolete version of Qwt and QwtPlot.
>
> I tried to fork the latest upstream source and begin to migrate
> code
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug #894581 [release.debian.org] RM: scidavis/1:1.22-1
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #894581 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alte
Hey,
Thanks a lot!
> BTW I had to fix all your commands because of the bad versions... Next time
> try to get them right, or don't specify the version at all (it's optional).
sorry - I do not have written a lot of them. But I thought I need to specify a
version, as in the docu[1] it is not ment
On 02/04/18 00:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 01/04/18 16:14, Sandro Knauß wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> after uploading kdepim, the buildds had built KDE Pim 17.12.3 successfully
>> for amd64 and i386 (other archs are still building).
>>
>> Now we needs some binNMUs. I don't know, do I need to use
On 01/04/18 16:14, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> Hey,
>
> after uploading kdepim, the buildds had built KDE Pim 17.12.3 successfully
> for amd64 and i386 (other archs are still building).
>
> Now we needs some binNMUs. I don't know, do I need to use a separate bug for
> those requests or is it the corr
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:45:10PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:53:05 +0200 Dominik George
> wrote:
> > Files in second .deb but not in first
> > -
> > -rw-r--r-- root/root /lib/security/pam_krb5_migrate_mit.so
>
> > Files in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Scidavis hardly relies on Qt4 and its Qt3 compatibility facilities.
It still uses an obsolete version of Qwt and QwtPlot.
I tried to fork the latest upstream source and begin to migrate
code fro
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 stretch
Bug #893006 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package
boost1.62/1.62.0+dfsg-4+deb9u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #893006 to the same tags previously set
--
893006: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893006
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tag -1 stretch
On 2018-04-01 14:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Andreas - you tagged #883987 as "buster sid" despite the version
> tracking implying that stretch was affected. Do you remember the
> details as to why?
Most likely:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:13:18 +0100 (CET) Pierre Saramito
wr
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 20:53:05 +0200 Dominik George
wrote:
> Files in second .deb but not in first
> -
> -rw-r--r-- root/root /lib/security/pam_krb5_migrate_mit.so
> Files in first .deb but not in second
> -
> -rw-r--r-- ro
On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 22:38:18 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt"
wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 20:13 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > * Switch dpkg trigger to noawait. Closes: #864953.
>
> It would have been helpful to indicate what issue this was solving. (I
> realise that the changelog for the unstable upl
Dear release team,
Since Dec 2016⁰ I have been working together with multiple people
(including nthykier) to prepare the integration of britney with
autopkgtest results. We believe the work has reached a state where full
deployment can be considered. Let me describe how it is designed to work
and
Hey,
after uploading kdepim, the buildds had built KDE Pim 17.12.3 successfully for
amd64 and i386 (other archs are still building).
Now we needs some binNMUs. I don't know, do I need to use a separate bug for
those requests or is it the correct way to file the wb actions just here inside
the
On Sun, 2018-04-01 at 14:42 +0200, Philipp Huebner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 31.03.2018 um 23:34 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > It's unclear to me that this actually affects stretch in any
> > meaningful
> > way.
> >
> > While the version tracking information does include the stretch
> > version
> > in
Hi,
Am 31.03.2018 um 23:34 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> It's unclear to me that this actually affects stretch in any meaningful
> way.
>
> While the version tracking information does include the stretch version
> in the "found" list, the bug is tagged "buster sid". From reading the
> bug log, it l
tags 893803 + pending
thanks
Dear Adam,
> > adminer (4.2.5-3+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=high
[…]
> s/coul /could /
Well spotted and thanks for the ACK. adminer_4.2.5-3+deb9u1_amd64.changes
uploaded. For completeness, I've also attached the full updated debdiff.
(I assume another RT member is re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 893803 + pending
Bug #893803 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package adminer/4.2.5-3+deb9u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
893803: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
17 matches
Mail list logo
