Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dma-0.0.2010.06.17-14. It fixes a grave
bug (#686164) with a minimal change to a patch and a refreshing
of the line numbers of several other patches.
I attach a debd
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:48:46 +0100
with message-id <1346482126.7606.49.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686398: unblock: manpages-fr-extra/20120831
has caused the Debian Bug report #686398,
regarding unblock: manpages-fr-extra/20120831
to be mar
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:41:40 +0100
with message-id <1346481700.7606.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686404: unblock: texlive-base/2012.20120611-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #686404,
regarding unblock: texlive-base/2012.20120611-4
to be marked
On 08/31/2012 07:01 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-08-04 17:18, Neil Roeth wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package aplus-fsf
The dependency on xemacs21-nomule was blocking it; I removed that dep
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libpam-rsa, it's just a debconf translation
update.
The little noise in the Makefile is an automatic one, made during the
build process.
unblock libpam-rsa/0.8-9-2.4
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package texlive-base
Dear release team managers,
I would like to ask for an unblock of
texlive-base 2012.20120611-4
Changes from -3 are minimal:
* fix a typo from
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lojban-common, it's just a translat^Wrepack
trimming a non-DFSG file.
The attached debdiff excludes the longish non-free file.
unblock lojban-common/1.5+dfsg-0.1
Th
6122 insertions(+), 4522 deletions(-)
Let me just paste the new changelog entry (last update of the package
was just before the freeze, Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:51:45 -0400).
manpages-fr-extra (20120831) unstable; urgency=low
[ David Prévot ]
* Update translation of procps 1:3.3.3-2
* Update transl
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 23:47:08 +0100
with message-id <1346453228.7606.47.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685278: unblock: sysvinit/2.88dsf-32
has caused the Debian Bug report #685278,
regarding unblock: sysvinit/2.88dsf-32
to be marked as done.
This mea
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 09:25:19AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package sysvinit
>
> sysvinit in unstable fixes a large number of bugs:
> 55707 232569 353229 385172
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 22:55 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:33:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 22:11 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:32:37AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:21:33P
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 21:48 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> sysvinit -31 has been unblocked, so I've also unblocked base-files;
> thanks.
Clearly I missed #678106, so base-files didn't migrate in tonight's
brintey run; closing it with this mail, so it should hit testing
tomorrow.
Regards,
Adam
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:33:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 22:11 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:32:37AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:21:33PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > >
> > > > https://rt.perl.org
When I tried to enumerate the specific fixes that I thought were
particularly suited to wheezy, I ended up with about half of the total
changes here. With this sort of ratio of fixes to new features, I
wondered whether you would be prepared to accept an upload of this
new version in its entirety?
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> That got sorted. Was there anything left from this round of unblocks,
> or could we close the bug now?
I did not see anything that still needs an unblock. pkg-kde-tools and
gnome-disk-utility did not migrate yet, but that should happen in a few
days.
Ansgar
--
To
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:36:08 +0100
with message-id <1346448968.7606.43.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686389: unblock: fwanalog/0.6.9-6.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686389,
regarding unblock: fwanalog/0.6.9-6.2
to be marked as done.
This means
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 22:11 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:32:37AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:21:33PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >
> > > https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=114454
> > >
> > > I'm not sure whether i
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:29:51 +0100
with message-id <1346448591.7606.41.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684367: unblock: roaraudio/1.0~beta2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684367,
regarding unblock: roaraudio/1.0~beta2-3
to be marked as done.
This
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:32:37AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:21:33PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > https://rt.perl.org/rt3//Public/Bug/Display.html?id=114454
> >
> > I'm not sure whether it's appropriate to put this into perl for wheezy.
> > I think the risk of
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #685687 [release.debian.org] unblock: ardour/1:2.8.14-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
685687: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685687
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 14:42 +0200, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> Please unblock package ardour
For the avoidance of confusion for those of us following via the list,
this never reached debian-release, probably due to the size of the
attachment.
> We have noticed that the vers
> Is there an ETA for the t-p-u upload being ready for review?
The package is ready and i have made the upload request to my sponsor at
the pkg-tcltk-devel list:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-tcltk-devel/2012-August/002078.html
Regards,
Héctor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:13:50 +0100
with message-id <1346447630.7606.35.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685709: unblock: xdebug/2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685709,
regarding unblock: xdebug/2.2.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:01:51 +0100
with message-id <1346446911.7606.34.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685722: unblock (pre-approval): kamera/4:4.8.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #685722,
regarding unblock (pre-approval): kamera/4:4.8.4-2
to be m
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:58:50 +0100
with message-id <1346446730.7606.33.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685918: unblock: roundcube/0.7.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #685918,
regarding unblock: roundcube/0.7.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:54:35 +0100
with message-id <1346446475.7606.32.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686244: unblock: libav/6:0.8.3-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #686244,
regarding unblock: libav/6:0.8.3-7
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 23:58 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Modestas Vainius (22/08/2012):
> > On Wednesday 22 August 2012 20:35:23 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Modestas Vainius (22/08/2012):
> > > > On 2012 m. of August 22 d., Wednesday 14:09:28 Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > > > It includes a new f
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fwanalog, it's just a debconf translation update.
unblock fwanalog/0.6.9-6.2
Thanks in advance, regards.
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:48:47 +0100
with message-id <1346446127.7606.29.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#683560: unblock: base-files/6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #683560,
regarding unblock: base-files/6.11
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 01:55 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Josh Triplett (30/07/2012):
> > +--- trunk/Settings.c 2012/02/17 13:45:58 285
> > trunk/Settings.c 2012/03/05 11:12:58 286
> > +@@ -239,7 +239,9 @@
> > + mkdir(htopDir, 0700);
> > + free(htopDir);
> >
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 14:08 +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:55:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Iain Lane (05/07/2012):
> > > Please ack an unblock of package pinta. I just uploaded it to
> > > experimental in case you deny this request, so we still have room to
> > > ch
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:35 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote:
> Just waiting to see if anyone else has something to say about it, but it
> doesn't seem the case.
>
> Ok, i'll prepare the fix for #677060 and ask for upload to
> testing-proposed-updates.
Okay; thanks.
Is there an ETA for the t-p-u upl
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 17:14 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 22:08:21 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote:
>
> > Would an updated package, with changes over 1:1.18.1-1 as shown in the
> > attached patch, be acceptable for wheezy?
[...]
> If that results in correct dependencies then yes
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 13:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'd like to ask for a freeze exception based on the 'beyond a maintainer's
> control' part of the loose freeze policy. Upstream released this before the
> freeze (and I would have uploaded it then, the same time I did sip4 and
> python-qt
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 22:24:38 +0200
with message-id <20120831202438.gn6...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#685765: unblock: php5/5.4.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #685765,
regarding unblock: php5/5.4.4-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 22:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 21:46:36 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> > -CFLAGS := -Wall -g -O$(if $(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),0,2)
> > -DEB_MAKE_BUILD_TARGET := CFLAGS='$(CFLAGS) -DSYSLOG' LDFLAGS='-lcdb -ldb'
> > +export DEB_BUI
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #682097 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbskkd-cdb/1:2.00-5
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
682097: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682097
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 22:31 +0900, Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote:
> Please unblock dbskkd-cdb/1:2.00-5 to enable hardening flags for wheezy.
>
> Changes:
>
> * debian/rules: Use dpkg-buildflags to support hardening flags
> -CFLAGS := -Wall -g -O$(if $(findstring noopt,$(
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I discussed this briefly with Neil at DebConf, and he seemed to think it
would be ok; if you disagree, it's his fault. ;)
The version of upstart currently in testing is ancient. Getting it
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:53:23 +0100
with message-id <1346442803.7606.19.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686024: Unblock suitesparse/1:3.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #686024,
regarding Unblock suitesparse/1:3.4.0-3
to be marked as done.
This m
On 08/19/12 16:25, Tobias Hansen wrote:
Am 19.08.2012 14:33, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
It would be helpful to know if any of the reverse dependencies haven't
yet been rebuilt against the new version.
The result is that the following reverse dependencies didn't receive
updates since May 13:
li
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:38:33 +0100
with message-id <1346441913.7606.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686307: unblock: ocl-icd/1.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #686307,
regarding unblock: ocl-icd/1.3-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 18:21 +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Concerning http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676423
>
> There is a grave bug in doxygen (segfault which causes other packages to
> FTBFS) which has been fixed in unstable together with other minor fixes,
> including a new u
Processing changes file: rtfm_2.4.2-4+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: otrs2_2.4.9+dfsg1-3+squeeze3_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: typo3-src_4.3.9+dfsg1-1+squeeze5_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
Le 31/08/2012 19:47, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been accepted.
I just received the "ACCEPTED into unstable" mail.
Thanks a lot,
Vincent
> Regards,
>
> Adam
>
--
Vincent Danjean Adresse: Laboratoire d'Informatique de Greno
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 23:51 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Essentially, a member of the release team needs to decide that they're
> > happy with the changes between the current version of open-iscsi in
> > testing and the version in unstable. The size of the changes means that
> > it'll take
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:19:12 +0200
with message-id <20120831191912.gm6...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#684735: unblock: ganglia (security)
has caused the Debian Bug report #684735,
regarding unblock: ganglia (security)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > While building a squeeze backport of new release of python-brian package
> > I just found out that there is a g++ 4.4 compatibility issue with weave
> > of scipy shipped in squeeze. Fix is trivial -- I adopted it from a
> > package in Ubuntu (links a
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:53:35 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Dear Release team,
>
> While building a squeeze backport of new release of python-brian package
> I just found out that there is a g++ 4.4 compatibility issue with weave
> of scipy shipped in squeeze. Fix is trivial -- I adopted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 31/08/2012 14:30, Jonathan Nieder a écrit :
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:02:59 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> David Prévot wrote:
>
Since grub-legacy (even 0.97-64) already provides grub, the few
rema
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:02:59 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> David Prévot wrote:
>>> Since grub-legacy (even 0.97-64) already provides grub, the few
>>> remaining rdepends*, if any remains, shouldn't be affected
>>
>> That's not comforting at all, since grub-le
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:02:59 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> David Prévot wrote:
>
> > Since grub-legacy (even 0.97-64) already provides grub, the few
> > remaining rdepends*, if any remains, shouldn't be affected
>
> That's not comforting at all, since grub-legacy is
fixed python-scipy/0.8.0-1
thanks
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 11:53 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > While building a squeeze backport of new release of python-brian package
> > I just found out that there is a g++ 4.4 compatibility issue with weave
>
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:57:15 +0100
with message-id <1346435835.7606.8.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686365: RM: pyjamas/0.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686365,
regarding RM: pyjamas/0.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 11:53 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> While building a squeeze backport of new release of python-brian package
> I just found out that there is a g++ 4.4 compatibility issue with weave
> of scipy shipped in squeeze. Fix is trivial -- I adopted it from a
> package in Ubuntu
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:53:22 +0100
with message-id <1346435602.7606.6.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686381: unblock:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx/96.43.20-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #686381,
regarding unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers-
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:51:57 +0100
with message-id <1346435517.7606.5.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686370: unblock: efingerd/1.6.2.7+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686370,
regarding unblock: efingerd/1.6.2.7+nmu1
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:48:53 +0100
with message-id <1346435333.7606.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686379: unblock: cpu/1.4.3-11.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #686379,
regarding unblock: cpu/1.4.3-11.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #686307 [release.debian.org] unblock: ocl-icd/1.3-3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
686307: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-96xx. There are
only translation updates.
[ Debconf translations ]
* French (fr): Christian PERRIER (Closes: #683716)
*
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 08:02 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> Le 31/08/2012 07:27, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> > On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 01:56 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> >> I just released a new (upstream) version [1.4] of ocl-icd that fix
> >> important
> >> bugs.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cpu, its just a debconf translation update.
unblock cpu/1.4.3-11.3
Thanks in advance, regards.
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefer
Hi David,
David Prévot wrote:
> grub 0.97-64 (in Squeeze) is already a dummy package that depends on
> grub-pc,
That's comforting.
[...]
> Since grub-legacy (even 0.97-64) already provides grub, the few
> remaining rdepends*, if any remains, shouldn't be affected
That's not comforting
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package ez-ipupdate, it's just a debconf translation
update.
unblock ez-ipupdate/3.0.11b8-13.4
Thanks in advance, regards.
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: whe
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:37:25 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> The Release Notes say that 1.19.2 is a security-fix release,
> and does not list any unrelated changes. Question is, (to the
> more seasoned MW packagers) can we trust that, and (to the
> Release Team) would it be acceptable to bump
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package efingerd, it's just a debconf translation update.
unblock efingerd/1.6.2.7+nmu1
Thanks in advance, regards.
David
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: 686...@bugs.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org
Hi release team,
I wonder if we should consider removing the grub dummy package from the
grub source
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please drop pyjamas/0.7-1 from testing. It depends on sugar-hulahop,
which is going away for Wheezy.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
Dear Release team,
While building a squeeze backport of new release of python-brian package
I just found out that there is a g++ 4.4 compatibility issue with weave
of scipy shipped in squeeze. Fix is trivial -- I adopted it from a
package in Ubuntu (links are in the patch). I tested that it
resol
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:48:16 +0200
Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> I am afraid I will have to ask you to at least drop the debhelper compat
> change.
>
Okay, I reverted the compat.
> > + * debian/copyright
> > + - merge contents of same field
> > + - remove undefined fields: Debianized-Dat
On 2012-08-29 04:52, Koichi Akabe wrote:
> The current package contains compatibility probrem with bzr 2.6 and
> fixed version was pushed to upstream vcs.
>
> I want to update it to newer snapshot.
> I attached a patch.
>
> Is the new package acceptable?
>
> Regards,
> -- Koichi Akabe vbkaisetsu
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:24:23 +0200
with message-id <5040acf7.7070...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#686230: unblock: libmtp/1.1.3-35-g0ece104-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #686230,
regarding unblock: libmtp/1.1.3-35-g0ece104-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
On 2012-08-31 00:21, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear release team,
>
> Please consider a release exception for the package libquantum version
> 1.1.0-3.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
Looks fine, feel free to go ahead and ping us when it has been in
unstab
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:06:08 +0200
with message-id <5040a8b0.60...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#686344: unblock: simplesamlphp/1.9.2.-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686344,
regarding unblock: simplesamlphp/1.9.2.-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:04:44 +0200
with message-id <5040a85c.3050...@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#683831: unblock: aplus-fsf/4.22.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683831,
regarding unblock: aplus-fsf/4.22.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
On 2012-07-31 10:49, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> sön 2012-07-29 klockan 12:46 +0200 skrev Niels Thykier:
>> On 2012-07-29 06:47, Mattias Ellert wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: freeze-exception
>>>
>>> unblock bdi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
Please unblock package simplesamlphp. It's a security-update only release
that further tightens the screws on the security issue addressed in 1.9.1,
after further discussion with the sc
On 2012-08-04 17:18, Neil Roeth wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package aplus-fsf
>
> The dependency on xemacs21-nomule was blocking it; I removed that dependency.
> The full set of bin
On Fri 31 Aug 2012 04:12:12 Mike Gabriel escribió:
> On Sa 18 Aug 2012 21:34:22 CEST "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
> >> I will wait another 3 days (Wednesday 2012-07-15, 23:59 UTC) and if no
> >> other feedback has been written, I will proceed as recommended.
> >
> > Any news on that?
>
> Just for the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # as per what adsb said on IRC
> reassign 678242 release.debian.org
Bug #678242 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: Package with a problem link to a
broken link: check why
Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'release.debian.org'.
Ignoring r
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Please see here for more info:
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/mediawiki/295767
Thanks.
The Release Notes say that 1.19.2 is a security-fix release,
and does not list any unrelated changes. Question is, (to the
more seasoned MW packag
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:16:52 +0200
with message-id <20120831081652.gf6...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#686319: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.7esr-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686319,
regarding unblock: iceweasel/10.0.7esr-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:22:49 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to upload libnss3 3.13.6, with an additional change to make
> the binary compressed with xz (bug 683835).
>
[...]
>
> Any objection?
>
Go ahead.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:22:57 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#686320: unblock: melange/1:2012.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #686320,
regarding unblock: melange/1:2012.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:20:26 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#686321: unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #686321,
regarding unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:18:27 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#686323: unblock: horizon/2012.1.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #686323,
regarding unblock: horizon/2012.1.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Sa 18 Aug 2012 21:34:22 CEST "Adam D. Barratt" wrote:
I will wait another 3 days (Wednesday 2012-07-15, 23:59 UTC) and if no
other feedback has been written, I will proceed as recommended.
Any news on that?
Just for the record. The reworked source package (0.4.3-2) has been
uploaded to
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 07:28:24AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Note one of the CVEs essentially disables webGL with mesa because of a
> mesa bug that leads to security problems.
Considering the mesa bug has been fixed in 8.0.4-2 and doesn't affect
stable/stable-backports, I'm planning a 10.0.7esr-
88 matches
Mail list logo
