On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 23:51 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Essentially, a member of the release team needs to decide that they're
> > happy with the changes between the current version of open-iscsi in
> > testing and the version in unstable.  The size of the changes means that
> > it'll take some time to go through.  Reducing the size of that job by
> > producing a filtered diff that excludes e.g. documentation and
> > test-suite changes would likely help.  Unless the udeb changes touched
> > anything outside of debian/ (which I would suspect they didn't) then
> > dropping those changes now is unlikely to make any material difference
> > to the size of the diff.
> 
> I understand your point now. Thank you for explaining. That indeed is a
> lot of changes in the open-iscsi package. I will wait for your review.
Thanks for bearing with us.  Having looked over both the Debian and
upstream changelogs and taking in to account that no significant issues
have been found and the part we played in delaying both the review and
migration, I feel users of the package would be best served by allowing
the package to migrate so have added an unblock.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1346440812.7606.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org

Reply via email to