Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Luk Claes [2009-02-09 23:45]:
>
>> Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>>> I prepared version 5.0.29-1lenny1 that fixes an annoying RC bug in my praat
>>> package (#514652). The minimal debdiff is attached below.
>>>
>>> Questions: Should I upload the package to unstable or
* Luk Claes [2009-02-09 23:45]:
> Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > I prepared version 5.0.29-1lenny1 that fixes an annoying RC bug in my praat
> > package (#514652). The minimal debdiff is attached below.
> >
> > Questions: Should I upload the package to unstable or is it better to upload
> > it
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 04:17:43PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>please approve / unblock xfsprogs/2.9.8-1lenny1
replaced 'ss' with 's' in the subject header and in the line above.
>it closes 514072
>
>it was uploaded to testing-proposed-updates
>
>interdiff -zp1 xfsprogs_2.9.8-1.diff.gz
please approve / unblock xfsprogss/2.9.8-1lenny1
it closes 514072
it was uploaded to testing-proposed-updates
interdiff -zp1 xfsprogs_2.9.8-1.diff.gz xfsprogs_2.9.8-1lenny1.diff.gz
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- xfsprogs-2.9.8.orig/Makefile
+++ xfsprogs-2.9.8/Makefile
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 05:17 +, Debian Installer wrote:
> Changes: bind9 (1:9.5.1.dfsg.P1-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * New upstream patch release
> - supportable version of fix from 9.5.0.dfsg.P2-5.1
> - CVE-2009-0025: Closes: #511936
> - 2475: Overly agressive cache entry re
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:01:35AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
> on hppa several days ago but haven't been accepted into unstable yet?
> Is this something you can investigate? These binaries are needed for
> lenny.
Both ar
Zitat von "Julien Cristau" :
I don't think recommending its use in the release notes for
etch->lenny is a good idea at all.
We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
search and replace in the release notes. (Not globally, there
are some cases, where this is not possible. At som
Hi,
buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
on hppa several days ago but haven't been accepted into unstable yet?
Is this something you can investigate? These binaries are needed for
lenny.
geda-gschem and some of the others also took a few days from build to
unst
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> I prepared version 5.0.29-1lenny1 that fixes an annoying RC bug in my praat
> package (#514652). The minimal debdiff is attached below.
>
> Questions: Should I upload the package to unstable or is it better to upload
> it to t-p-u? Should the urgency be set to "high"
Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please unblock galeon 2.0.6-2.1 ? It has a fix for a
> recently-discovered security problem. Urgency is high, so it should make
> it to testing before Thursday.
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.de
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 05 février 2009, vers 00:13, Steffen
> Joeris disait :
>
>> | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in RoundCube Webmail
>> | (roundcubemail) 0.2 stable allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary
>> | web script or HTML via the backg
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded this bugfix-only release a few hours ago. It closes these
> two debian bugs (It also fixes a third bug which I have not confirmed
> affects Debian).
unblocked
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 03.02.2009, 20:35 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
>> Too late as it migrated already, though I could approve -24 when it's
>> installed on all release arches :-)
>
> Could you please approve -24? Thanks!
done
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 23:17 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Note, that the release notes still recommend aptitude (which
> I never used, so I'm neither pro nor contra), because it was
> agreed on for the etch release notes and the bug #411280 is
> still open. I would be happy if we (better late t
I prepared version 5.0.29-1lenny1 that fixes an annoying RC bug in my praat
package (#514652). The minimal debdiff is attached below.
Questions: Should I upload the package to unstable or is it better to upload
it to t-p-u? Should the urgency be set to "high"?
Thanks,
--
Rafael
diff -u praat
Zitat von "Steve Langasek" :
This is not a matter for you to decide by fiat. The tools recommended in
the release notes should be the ones that work most reliably for
dist-upgrading from the previous release. Based on various upgrade reports
I've seen over the past year, that isn't aptitude.
Your message dated Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:37:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#514262: fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #514262,
regarding tmsnc: removal from stable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:07:28PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > Adeodato Simó writes:
> >>> Upgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
> >>> management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
> >>> also by the apt-get package managemen
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> The preferred tool is aptitude.
>
> This is not a matter for you to decide by fiat. The tools recommended in
> the release notes should be the ones that work most reliably for
> dist-upgrading from the previous release. Based on various upgrade reports
> I've seen over t
Ben Finney wrote:
> Adeodato Simó writes:
>
>>> Upgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
>>> management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
>>> also by the apt-get package management tool.
>> This should be consistent with the Release Notes. I haven't been
>
Adeodato Simó writes:
> > Upgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
> > management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
> > also by the apt-get package management tool.
>
> This should be consistent with the Release Notes. I haven't been
> tracking the releva
On 09/02/09 at 11:10 -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:20:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> > > * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrot
Hello,
Could you please unblock galeon 2.0.6-2.1 ? It has a fix for a
recently-discovered security problem. Urgency is high, so it should make
it to testing before Thursday.
Cheers,
Vincent
--
Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer
http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/
More than any ot
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 06:20:41PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> > * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > > Please upload a manual build this time. If you'
On 2009-02-09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --040603030801070601030404
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> [ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
>
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du jeudi 05 février 2009, vers 00:13, Steffen
Joeris disait :
> | Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in RoundCube Webmail
> | (roundcubemail) 0.2 stable allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary
> | web script or HTML via the background attribute embedded in an
On 09/02/09 at 16:33 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > Please upload a manual build this time. If you're in a position to do
> > > the same for hppa, please do that as well, el
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 08:26:40AM -0700, dann frazier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > * Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:43:40 +0100]:
> >
> > > On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0
* dann frazier [Mon, 09 Feb 2009 08:26:40 -0700]:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > Please upload a manual build this time. If you're in a position to do
> > the same for hppa, please do that as well, else we'll migrate ruby1.9 -9
> > without hppa.
> > Please r
Mike Markley writes:
> I discovered a remote crash in all versions of dkim-milter subsequent to
> 2.6.0 (which is the version currently in lenny). There's a patch to
> 2.6.0 which fixes this, and a more complete change to the included
> library resposnible for the failed assertion is shipped in 2.
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:25:10PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> * Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:43:40 +0100]:
>
> > On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
> > > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]:
>
> > > > On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual b
> The Debian Project is pleased to announce the official release of
> Debian GNU/Linux version 5.0, codenamed etch, after 22 months of
Hmm, shouldn't that be:
"codenamed lenny" :-)
and
> Also beginning with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, the package management >
system
> has been improved regarding secu
On Monday 09 February 2009 13:19:06 Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > Support for Macromedias Flash format is available via the swfdec plugin.
>
> Should Gnash be mentioned here? Is it ready for such a high profile
> mention? (Maintainers Bcc'ed.)
I believe this would have to be (replace (R) with the regis
Sergei Golovan writes:
> Appears that manderlbot (a small IRC bot) version in lenny can't be
> run in a documented way because it was built with the older Erlang
> version and has that version hardcoded into its boot script. I've
> slightly changed the startup behavior and uploaded the fixed packa
Here I put in my two cents' worth.
Yes, according to the rules many words in Russian are read with the
letter Ё (IO). However in fact when writing 99% of people use Е (IE)
instead of Ё (IO). In many printing offices this is generally a
standard. That's why a dictionary which considers
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:41:12 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
> >
> > - Debian Live
>
> jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
> "Debian GNU/Linux can be installed [...]" paragraph:
>
> In addi
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
>
> - Debian Live
jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
"Debian GNU/Linux can be installed [...]" paragraph:
In addition to the regular installation media, Debian GNU/Linux can
now also be dire
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 includes the ARM EABI port, armel. The new port is
> provides more efficient usage of modern and future ARM
>processors. The old ARM port (arm) is now depreceated.
>
>Now someone with better english
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, David Paleino wrote:
processors. The old ARM port (arm) is now depreceated.
^^^
s/depreceated/deprecated/
But... has it really been deprecated? Didn't know that :P
According to the release notes it will be in Lenny but no
* Lucas Nussbaum [Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:43:40 +0100]:
> On 05/02/09 at 14:12 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Lucas Nussbaum [Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:48 +0100]:
> > > On alpha, there's a segfault during the build. Manual builds on porter
> > > machines do work, though.
> > Failed again with the sa
Hey, Alexander, thanks for your work here! Some minor comments follow:
> supports a total of eleven processor architectures
As per Riku's comment about armel being missing, this should be 12.
> A total of eleven architectures are supported including:
Same here.
> Support for Macromedias Flash
Hi,
I uploaded this bugfix-only release a few hours ago. It closes these
two debian bugs (It also fixes a third bug which I have not confirmed
affects Debian).
| tor (0.2.0.34-1) unstable; urgency=high
| .
|* New upstream version:
| - Avoid a potential crash on exit nodes when proces
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:46:55 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > Debian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
> > systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
> > of eleven ar
> Martin-Éric Racine writes:
>
> > The following package needs both sponsoring and a freeze exception:
> >
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rus-ispell/rus-ispell_0.99g5-7.dsc
> >
> > To put the bug in context, some recent changes in the way some
> > building tools work under encod
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Debian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
> systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
> of eleven architectures are supported including: Sun SPARC (sparc), HP
> A
Zitat von "Alexander Reichle-Schmehl" :
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
the current state ]
Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
- Debian Live
- Emdebian
- Blu-ray
- SELinux
- OpenVZ
- Netbooks/EEE PC
One sentence each, written by a nati
Am Dienstag, den 03.02.2009, 20:35 +0100 schrieb Luk Claes:
> Too late as it migrated already, though I could approve -24 when it's
> installed on all release arches :-)
Could you please approve -24? Thanks!
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
the current state ]
Hi!
Attached you'll find the current draft of the announcement for the lenny
release. Based upon the announcement for the last release it's far from
ready :(
Especially the second and third paragraph
All,
I discovered a remote crash in all versions of dkim-milter subsequent to
2.6.0 (which is the version currently in lenny). There's a patch to
2.6.0 which fixes this, and a more complete change to the included
library resposnible for the failed assertion is shipped in 2.8.1, which
I plan to upl
49 matches
Mail list logo
