Re: svn-buildpackage - broken in etch

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:08:54PM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > On Tuesday 23 January 2007 17:56, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Personally, I'm not sure this is warranted; svn-upgrade is an optional > > feature of svn-buildpackage, which I don't think is used by terribly many > > maintainers. An

Please unblock xmms-crossfade/0.3.11-3

Please unblock xmms-crossfade/0.3.11-3. According to it is only "un-updated" due to the freeze (with 40 days already living in unstable). Thanks, Rogério Brito. -- Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:35:20AM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > I may be missing something, but why does it need to be moved? It starts > in rcS as well as rc2, so this should only ever be an issue in the rare > cases when you have to switch to runlevel 1 and back, right? This seems > like a rare

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

This one time, at band camp, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar said: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > > >The present situation forces all users of nis&autofs to manually > >shuffle their init scripts around, and this is a very common > >setup... Moving autofs to st

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:19:33AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > You don't need to rename the /etc/init.d file, just the symlink in > /etc/rc?.d. Sure, if I reimplemented the update-rc.d functionality in postinst, which I'm not very fond of either. Maybe it's worth it, to keep the hack as m

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:17:18AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > But IMO this solution is an ugly hack and highly counterintuitive - init > scripts are config files after all, and if I wanted to adapt a package's > initscript to my needs, I'd expect to find it at /etc/init.d/${package}, >

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

Hi Luk, > So, that's something we don't want to do, certainly not at this stage of > the release cycle. > > What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs > script to be something between 19nis and 20apache? conclusion first: If that's the ultimate response of the releas

Re: tasksel 2.66

Joey Hess wrote: > Changes since 2.63 include one code change, which fixes the other half > of the cause of RC bug 406630, and numerous changes to deal with > iceweasel's migration to etch. As usual, all the task membership changes > are already live in the overrides files. > > I've tested this ve

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 06:28:01PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > What's wrong with Steinar's suggestion to change the name of the autofs > script to be something between 19nis and 20apache? It's gross but it should work. At this late stage in the release cycle it looks like the best option. -- "Yo

tasksel 2.66

Changes since 2.63 include one code change, which fixes the other half of the cause of RC bug 406630, and numerous changes to deal with iceweasel's migration to etch. As usual, all the task membership changes are already live in the overrides files. I've tested this version of tasksel in an etch c

Please unblock geant321 1:3.21.14.dfsg-3

Dear release team, Please consider unblocking geant321 version 1:3.21.14.dfsg-3 so it may propagate into Etch if and when (there is an alpha build available) OR (alpha is dropped from Etch). Since the current version in Etch, 1:3.21.14.dfsg-1, the following changes have been applied. Important c

Please unblock paw 1:2.14.04-7

Dear release team, Please consider unblocking paw version 1:2.14.04-7 so it may propagate into Etch if and when (there is an alpha build available) OR (alpha is dropped from Etch). The only changes in this release are what I consider very low-risk edits to the conffile "/etc/X11/app-defaults/Paw+

Re: Please unblock tftp 0.7.dfsg-1.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days > ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: > > atftp (0.7.dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low Typo in subject... atftp unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fing

Re: Please unblock php-auth-pam 0.4-9.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days > ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: > > php-auth-pam (0.4-9.1) unstable; urgency=low unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 31

Re: Please unblock scsiadd 1.95-7.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days > ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: > > scsiadd (1.95-7.1) unstable; urgency=low unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 5

Re: Please unblock mailgraph 1.12-2.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few seconds > ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: > > mailgraph (1.12-2.1) unstable; urgency=low unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 3

Re: Please unblock ca-certificates 20061027.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few seconds > ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: > > ca-certificates (20061027.1) unstable; urgency=low unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5A

Re: Please unblock foomatic-filters 3.0.2-20061031-1.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few seconds > ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: > > foomatic-filters (3.0.2-20061031-1.1) unstable; urgency=low unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerpri

Re: Please unblock zephyr 2.1.20010518.SNAPSHOT-17.1

Christian Perrier wrote: > This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days > ago, fixed its pending debconf l10n bugs: > > zephyr (2.1.20010518.SNAPSHOT-17.1) unstable; urgency=low unblocked Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint:

Re: please remove jukebox-mercury from etch

Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > As stated in #408252, jukebox-mercury is not suitable for a stable > release, even if it was part of sarge by accident. > > Could you please remove it from etch ? Removal hint added. Cheers Luk > On 24/01/07 at 12:27 -0500, Brian White wrote: >>> On 24/01/07 at

Please unblock php-auth-pam 0.4-9.1

This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: php-auth-pam (0.4-9.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix remaining l10n bugs * Debconf templates translations: - German added. Closes: #398691 - French updated. Closes:

Please unblock tftp 0.7.dfsg-1.1

This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: atftp (0.7.dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix longstanding l10n issues * Debconf templates translations: - German updated. Closes: #399964 - Japanense updated.

Please unblock scsiadd 1.95-7.1

This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: scsiadd (1.95-7.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix remaining l10n issues * Debconf templates translations: - French updated. Closes: #399022 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Please unblock mailgraph 1.12-2.1

This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few seconds ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: mailgraph (1.12-2.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix remaining l10n issues * Debconf translation updates: - Italian. Closes: #399108 - French. Closes: #399368 -

Please unblock ca-certificates 20061027.1

This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few seconds ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: ca-certificates (20061027.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix remaining l10n issues * Debconf translation updates: - Czech. Closes: #407807 - Spanish. Closes: #40196

Please unblock foomatic-filters 3.0.2-20061031-1.1

This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few seconds ago, fixes its pending debconf l10n bugs: foomatic-filters (3.0.2-20061031-1.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix l10n issues * Debconf translation updates/additions: - German. Closes: #401469 - French. Close

Please unblock zephyr 2.1.20010518.SNAPSHOT-17.1

This NMU for that package, which I uploaded a few days ago, fixed its pending debconf l10n bugs: zephyr (2.1.20010518.SNAPSHOT-17.1) unstable; urgency=low * Non-maintainer upload to fix l10n issues * Debconf translation updates: - German. Closes: #396775 - French. Closes: #395978

Re: please unblock FAI 3.1.6

Thomas Lange wrote: > I had to upload FAI 3.1.6 because the former version introduced a > grave bug. Another important bug was also fixed in 3.1.6. Both bug > could be fixed with very small patches, so it should be easy to review > the diffs. Unblocked. Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.

please remove jukebox-mercury from etch

Hi, As stated in #408252, jukebox-mercury is not suitable for a stable release, even if it was part of sarge by accident. Could you please remove it from etch ? Thank you, On 24/01/07 at 12:27 -0500, Brian White wrote: > >On 24/01/07 at 11:05 -0500, Brian White wrote: > >>It's in "experimental"

Bug#341140: Info received (Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs)

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Jan Christoph Nordholz <[EMAIL P

Bug#400952: Info received (Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs)

Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this problem report. It has been forwarded to the package maintainer(s) and to other interested parties to accompany the original report. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL

Re: Bug#400952: rc order of portmap,nis,autofs

On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:28:46PM +1100, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:27:35AM +0100, Jan Christoph Nordholz wrote: > >block 341140 by 400952 > >thankyou > > > >Hi Anibal and Javier, > > > >I (as the new maintainer of autofs) would like to have the issue > >settled be

Re: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Re: Planning for an upgrade path from etch to lenny for mailman

Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs > > to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well. > > So I've understood, but cannot back this up with any documentation. > Where is this documented?

Please hint Vim for etch

The version of Vim currently in unstable (1:7.0-164+3) fixes numerous bugs. There are also a number of crash bugs fixed in the upstream patches since 122 (specifically patches 127, 134, 135, 152[0], 153). In case the number of changes between the versions in testing and unstable are considered to

Re: Planning for an upgrade path from etch to lenny for mailman

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:02:04PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: >> Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs >> to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well. > So I've understood, (...) Anyway, vorlon has unblocked t

Re: could thunar 0.4.0rc1-3 be uploaded to tpu and migrate to testing ?

On mer, 2007-01-24 at 04:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hi Yves-Aléxis, > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > we have received two translations fixes for thunar currently in testing. > > I've prepared a package for tpu (as unstable has thunar 0.5 already). >

Re: could thunar 0.4.0rc1-3 be uploaded to tpu and migrate to testing ?

Hi Yves-Aléxis, On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > we have received two translations fixes for thunar currently in testing. > I've prepared a package for tpu (as unstable has thunar 0.5 already). > There are the two translations patchs, and a little modification t

Re: [Pkg-mailman-hackers] Re: Planning for an upgrade path from etch to lenny for mailman

On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs > to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well. So I've understood, but cannot back this up with any documentation. Where is this documented? I'm curious as to the background of

please unblock FAI 3.1.6

I had to upload FAI 3.1.6 because the former version introduced a grave bug. Another important bug was also fixed in 3.1.6. Both bug could be fixed with very small patches, so it should be easy to review the diffs. -- regards Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

Re: Will there be a final warning for l10n uploads?

Frank Küster a écrit : > Dear release team, > > Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Package: tex-common >> Severity: wishlist >> Tags: l10n patch >> >> It is attached to this report. > > I'm not fond of making an upload to unstable for every single debconf > translation that drops in,

Will there be a final warning for l10n uploads?

Dear release team, Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: tex-common > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n patch > > It is attached to this report. I'm not fond of making an upload to unstable for every single debconf translation that drops in, and request a freeze exception. It would