Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:50 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Please keep in mind that the upgrade path from etch to lenny needs > > to work for etch r0 to lenny r0 as well. > > So I've understood, but cannot back this up with any documentation. > Where is this documented? I'm curious as to the background of this > requirement.
I don't know if this needs to be documented. If it needs to, I guess that the developer's reference would be the proper document. > > Then the best would be to provide mailman2.1 in lenny and allow an > > upgrade from mailman2.1 to mailman2.2 *in* lenny. > > That's certainly possible, but would require (more than) doubling of the > security support for mailman. We're quite motivated to prevent that > where possible. It would be better without, but from what I read, this seems to be difficult. Regards, Joey -- Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are. Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]