On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:08:54PM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > On Tuesday 23 January 2007 17:56, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Personally, I'm not sure this is warranted; svn-upgrade is an optional > > feature of svn-buildpackage, which I don't think is used by terribly many > > maintainers. And indeed, the changes related to svn_load_dirs alone are > > fairly intrusive and arguably not suitable for a t-p-u upload.
> Eh?! svn-upgrade is *essential* to the typical use of svn-buildpackage; it > would be a horrible inconvenience to not be able to use it. I use it for > all of my packages. Ok, I stand corrected. Eduard, do you have any objections to the unstable version of svn-buildpackage propagating to etch? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
