Re: Please allow ext2resize to propagate into etch

2006-09-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 11:01:39AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > The ext2resize package is frozen because it contain an udeb. The udeb > was added in version 1.1.19-8 when I believed it was needed to make > online resizable ext3 file systems in d-i. I've since learned that it > is enough t

Re: Strange problems on arm? (php4 not entered testing)

2006-09-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 08:17:16PM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=php4: > """ > Updating php4 makes 29 non-depending packages uninstallable on arm: > drupal-theme-marvinclassic, drupal-theme-unconed, nanourl, netmrg, > odontolinux, php-cgiwr

Re: Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 385793 thanks Mike Hommey writes: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > reopen 385793 > > > severity 385793 important > > > thanks > > > > > >

Re: Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 09:06:28PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do > > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability. > > Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more impor

Please hint fribidi 0.10.7-4 into testing

2006-09-30 Thread Lior Kaplan
Hi, Fribidi version 0.10.7-4 is in SID for 13 days. The changes from 0.10.7-3 are minor and don't bring any risk. It is frozen (i guess) due to its udeb which brings BiDi support to D-I. I'm CCing Frans just in case he will have any objection. Thanks. -- Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG fing

Re: Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Mike Hommey
> yes, if the tetex maintainers, the gtk maintainers and others would do > the same as you do now, we even had longer times of uninstallability. Uninstallability on few architectures, that have much more important problems than that. And I'm not uploading every other day. Plus, there are much less

Strange problems on arm? (php4 not entered testing)

2006-09-30 Thread Ondrej Sury
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=php4: """ Updating php4 makes 29 non-depending packages uninstallable on arm: drupal-theme-marvinclassic, drupal-theme-unconed, nanourl, netmrg, odontolinux, php-cgiwrap, php-imlib, php4-apache2-mod-bt, php4-apd, php4-auth-pam, php4-clama

Re: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Matthias Klose
reopen 385793 severity 385793 important thanks > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work done on java > build in this release makes them unnecessary. sorry, no. what you do here is to avoid the uninstallability for one case (which however still exists), but the original problem

Re: Please hint fribidi 0.10.7-4 into testing

2006-09-30 Thread Luk Claes
Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 30 September 2006 18:03, Lior Kaplan wrote: >> Fribidi version 0.10.7-4 is in SID for 13 days. The changes from >> 0.10.7-3 are minor and don't bring any risk. >> >> It is frozen (i guess) due to its udeb which brings BiDi support to >> D-I. I'm CCing Frans just in ca

Re: Please hint fribidi 0.10.7-4 into testing

2006-09-30 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 30 September 2006 18:03, Lior Kaplan wrote: > Fribidi version 0.10.7-4 is in SID for 13 days. The changes from > 0.10.7-3 are minor and don't bring any risk. > > It is frozen (i guess) due to its udeb which brings BiDi support to > D-I. I'm CCing Frans just in case he will have any obje

Re: Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > reopen 385793 > > severity 385793 important > > thanks > > > > > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work d

Re: Bug#385793: -dev packages should not be architecture all

2006-09-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 05:06:02PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reopen 385793 > severity 385793 important > thanks > > > Removed patches from NMUs by Matthias Klose, because work done on java > > build in this release makes them unnecessary. > > sorry, no. what you do here

Please allow ext2resize to propagate into etch

2006-09-30 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
The ext2resize package is frozen because it contain an udeb. The udeb was added in version 1.1.19-8 when I believed it was needed to make online resizable ext3 file systems in d-i. I've since learned that it is enough to move /sbin/tune2fs away during installation to get that. Because of this, I

Re: debugging output in apt-get update

2006-09-30 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2006-09-28 Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > apt-get update is still very verbose about the pdiff updates: > [about 300 lines with "Get: ..."] > Get:334 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB] > Get:335 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB] [...] > if i didn't run 'apt-get update' for some weeks,

cdbs update

2006-09-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Would you accept the attached cdbs update (not yet uploaded)? cdbs (0.4.47) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Reverse patches before cleaning build directory (simple-patchsys.mk) (closes: #387103) * cdbs-edit-patch: - Test directory after checking for help message (closes: #389503) - S

Re: debugging output in apt-get update

2006-09-30 Thread Martin Schulze
Jonas Meurer wrote: > hello, > > apt-get update is still very verbose about the pdiff updates: > > [about 300 lines with "Get: ..."] > Get:334 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB] > Get:335 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdiff [10.7kB] > Get:336 2006-09-27-1319.38.pdiff [4821B] > Get:337 2006-09-26-1322.12.pdif