* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 00:18]:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 02:35:17PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:24:23PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 15:21]:
> > > > It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
>
> > * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > >
> > > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 02:35:17PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:24:23PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 15:21]:
> > > It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that broke tiffsplit, 14
> > > days since the initial report abou
On Thursday 29 June 2006 18:40, Frans Pop wrote:
> For most architectures this looks OK, except for the following:
> - S/390 kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o
> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn
> the kernel udebs don't match kernel image on s.d.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Following a decision that happened around Debconf, Attilio Fiandrotti
> and Eddy Petrişor have produced a patch that backports DirectFB supports
> into GTK+ 2.8.18 (the current version in unstable) without affecting the
> X11
* Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 20:06]:
> On Friday 30 June 2006 19:21, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > From now on, the d-i team will be able to work on the installer, basing
> > their work on these experimental packages. However this is not enough
> > to produce a release.
> >
> > In the next
On Friday 30 June 2006 19:21, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> From now on, the d-i team will be able to work on the installer, basing
> their work on these experimental packages. However this is not enough
> to produce a release.
>
> In the next days, the stable 1.2 branch of libcairo should be released.
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> >>
> >>> - For mips the r4k and r5k ker
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 19:50]:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I would like to suggest the following hint for gts:
> >
> > easy gts/0.7.6-1.1 k3d/0.5.0.35-1.2
>
> Haha, I had that idea yesterday. But aba already tried the hint and
> noticed a FTBFS of
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would like to suggest the following hint for gts:
>
> easy gts/0.7.6-1.1 k3d/0.5.0.35-1.2
Haha, I had that idea yesterday. But aba already tried the hint and
noticed a FTBFS of k3d, with an ICE, which he could reproduce - Andi,
have you already filed
There are some news about GTK+ packages, and this relates to both GNOME
and the debian-installer. I'll try to sum them up here. Please note that
this is only a proposal, which is meant to be discussed.
I. The past
Until now, the graphical installer has been using a specially patched
GTK+ version,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>>
>>> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn the
>>> kernel udebs don't match
Hi team,
I think gnome-screensaver[0] (28 days old, no RC bugs), is a valid
candidate to enter testing but isn't building on arm yet (unmet deps).
Is it just a matter of reschedule the build on arm or we've a gnome
lib broken there (i guess not since nautilus looks good) ?
[0] = http://bjorn.hax
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 08:03:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 12:13:08PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
>>On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
>>
>>> - For mips the r4k and r5k kernel flavors match, but for sb1-swarm-bn the
>>> kernel udebs don't match
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:24:23PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 15:21]:
> > It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that broke tiffsplit, 14
> > days since the initial report about that and ten days since confirmation
> > and patch by the maintain
Le ven 30 juin 2006 14:56, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> Dear Debian release team,
>
> I would like to suggest the following hint for gts:
>
> easy gts/0.7.6-1.1 k3d/0.5.0.35-1.2
nope, k3d is not built against the right gts. it has been binNMUed but
FTBFS on ia64 (IIRC). a bug is open on g++ for tha
* Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 15:21]:
> It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that broke tiffsplit, 14
> days since the initial report about that and ten days since confirmation
> and patch by the maintainer. But there is no reaction of any kind by the
> security team.
>
> C
Christoph Biedl wrote...
> > Package: libtiff-tools
> > Version: 3.7.2-5
> > Severity: important
It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that broke tiffsplit, 14
days since the initial report about that and ten days since confirmation
and patch by the maintainer. But there is no reaction of
Dear Debian release team,
I would like to suggest the following hint for gts:
easy gts/0.7.6-1.1 k3d/0.5.0.35-1.2
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 19:37 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 19:11 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> >
> > > Scott James Remnant dropped me an email recently, interested in
> > > improving the automake situation in Ubuntu and Debia
20 matches
Mail list logo
