* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060701 00:18]: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 02:35:17PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:24:23PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 15:21]: > > > > It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that broke tiffsplit, 14 > > > > days since the initial report about that and ten days since confirmation > > > > and patch by the maintainer. But there is no reaction of any kind by the > > > > security team. > > > > > Can you please clarify your policy regarding regressions in security > > > > updates? In my opinion a second update should be issued as soon as > > > > possible. > > > > >From the stable release team's perspective, that is correct. Fixing > > > libtiff is a precondition for the next stable pointrelease, sarge r3. > > > An upload was made by Steve Langasek on Jun 26 and should be released > > soon. > > Seems to be a /different/ regression, the fix I uploaded was for > libfreetype6 rather than for libtiff. :)
Ok, I uploaded the fix for this regression now. Christian, thanks for finding, isolating the problem and providing an fix. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
