* Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060630 15:21]: > It's now three weeks since advisory DSA 1901 that broke tiffsplit, 14 > days since the initial report about that and ten days since confirmation > and patch by the maintainer. But there is no reaction of any kind by the > security team. > > Can you please clarify your policy regarding regressions in security > updates? In my opinion a second update should be issued as soon as > possible.
>From the stable release team's perspective, that is correct. Fixing libtiff is a precondition for the next stable pointrelease, sarge r3. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
