Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A Debian user *has* found yet another odd interaction between Kerberos and
> OpenLDAP (I can see Steve groaning already). comp.protocols.kerberos has
> the thread; it's not in the BTS yet, in part because I don't really
> understand what's going on. Ker
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:01:27PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:39:34 -0800, Steve Langasek said:
> > Just for reference, can you explain what it is that prevents the
> > library versions from being co-installable? I would expect a
> > mass-rebuild anyway, but it sends up wa
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 04:39:34 -0800, Steve Langasek said:
> Just for reference, can you explain what it is that prevents the
> library versions from being co-installable? I would expect a
> mass-rebuild anyway, but it sends up warning flags for me to hear that
> partial upgrades won't work. :)
I
Hi!
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [051216 13:30]:
> Anyone want to post a list on wiki.debian.org, *without* maintainer names
> (which are really only relevant to... the maintainers), so that it can be
> used as a potential TODO list for this weekend's BSP?
Basicaly done at: http://wiki.d
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:11:38AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On IRC request from Steve, attached is a list of packages, sorted by
> > maintainer, that still build-depend on xlibs-dev. It's rather large, but
> > I'd imagine that
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:11:38AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On IRC request from Steve, attached is a list of packages, sorted by
> maintainer, that still build-depend on xlibs-dev. It's rather large, but
> I'd imagine that most of it will clear up once people start getting
> FTBFS's.
This lis
Hi Christian,
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:10:11AM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> May I submit wishlist bug reports to ca. 60 packages now that build-depend on
> an old version of libmysqlclientNN-dev? The proposed new libmysqlclient15
> uses versioned symbols so it's not a problematic transitio
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right. Is there any reason not to override the urgency immediately on
> libapache-mod-auth-kerb?
Not that I can think of. There aren't any major changes between the
version in testing and the version in unstable, as I recall, and this last
change was
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 10:09:07PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here's the summary of where we're at.
> krb5 is currently blocking KDE, as well as a few other things. I've
> closed the bug to keep it out of testing, as most of the details have now
> been sorted out.
> The new krb5 package doesn'
9 matches
Mail list logo
