Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A Debian user *has* found yet another odd interaction between Kerberos and > OpenLDAP (I can see Steve groaning already). comp.protocols.kerberos has > the thread; it's not in the BTS yet, in part because I don't really > understand what's going on. Kerberos upstream is actively investigating.
[...] > The thing is, there's code in Kerberos specifically to *keep* it from > doing this by setting a flag if it initialized without pthreads that's > supposed to keep it from ever using pthread-related mutexes later. It > seems that this is not working for some reason for this particular user, > maybe. > I'm not sure if this is sufficiently critical to warrant an RC bug, and > in fact I'm not even sure where the bug is yet, although it's looking > more and more like it's in the Kerberos libraries. Sam and Ken have now found and fixed this problem and Sam has uploaded a new version of krb5 with this bug fixed (and with high urgency), so now we should be all clear to let krb5 migrate. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
