On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:11:38AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > > On IRC request from Steve, attached is a list of packages, sorted by > > maintainer, that still build-depend on xlibs-dev. It's rather large, but > > I'd imagine that most of it will clear up once people start getting > > FTBFS's.
> This list includes packages that only declare an alternative build > dependency on xlibs-dev, and therefore looks a bit worse than the real > situation should be. Those should be removed from the attached list. But > to immediately spoil the good news, I've also included packages in > contrib and non-free, so in the end we should be about level. Anyone want to post a list on wiki.debian.org, *without* maintainer names (which are really only relevant to... the maintainers), so that it can be used as a potential TODO list for this weekend's BSP? Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
