Re: Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

2005-09-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:57:27PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:42:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:37:25PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:35:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at

Re: Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

2005-09-27 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 07:42:34PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:37:25PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:35:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > > > Could you please all

Re: Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

2005-09-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:37:25PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:35:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing? > > The current version of dhcp3 in testing is

Re: Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

2005-09-27 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:35:12PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing? > > The current version of dhcp3 in testing is the same as the version in > unstable...? > I think Joey hinted i

Re: Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

2005-09-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 08:32:12PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing? The current version of dhcp3 in testing is the same as the version in unstable...? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-09-27 Thread Camm Maguire
Thanks! This is ready for next upload whenever that happens, already had uploaded /u+x (which appears to be working). Take care, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sat, Sep 24

Re: mpich C++ transition status

2005-09-27 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2005-09-26 Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:32:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: >>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] >>> mkdir -p debian/tmp/usr/bin >>> cd $(dirname $(find -name lamclean -perm +u+x -

Please allow dhcp3 to enter testing

2005-09-27 Thread Andrew Pollock
Hi, Could you please allow dhcp3 to enter testing? Thanks Andrew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Removing GNOME 1 (was Re: orbit2cpp

2005-09-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:43:17PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : > > > What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are > > > libraries bu

Re: Removing GNOME 1 (was Re: orbit2cpp

2005-09-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : > > What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are > > libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like > > gpredict

Re: Removing GNOME 1 (was Re: orbit2cpp

2005-09-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit : > What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are > libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like > gpredict and gnucash and plenty of others. > > Why is libpng10 being removed if it