On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 11:45:52PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Another pass over security holes that are fixed in unstable but not
> testing. Not sure if these are still useful to send to -release.
Yes, I think they are.
> Testing team summary: well, of these asterisk, inkscape, some kde stuff,
> l
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However, there is one catch. hdf5 also got pulled into this migration
> due to its dependency on the mpich package. This has already been fixed
> in the version in unstable, but that means that hdf5's dependencies will
> all also have to be ready to go.
I just discovered that the ntp source is a nest of licensing problems.
The arlib subdir isn't distributable.
Neither is the entire libparse subdir, or anything else by Frank Kardel.
I'm not actually sure it will build without these bits.
So I guess NTP should be removed from Debian. It's not ve
Joey Hess wrote:
>RM summary: m68k is killing us with ICE after ICE and contributing to
>blocking hald of the fixes. The transitions arn't hurting as much after
>the last heroic britney run, although kde/qt is of course a problem.
Time to declare m68k broken.
>Testing team summary: well, of these
Another pass over security holes that are fixed in unstable but not
testing. Not sure if these are still useful to send to -release.
RM summary: m68k is killing us with ICE after ICE and contributing to
blocking hald of the fixes. The transitions arn't hurting as much after
the last heroic britney
Bugs filed for the four packages which haven't been uploaded for the fltk
transition. Bugs also filed for flac, stk, and spiralsynthmodular (with
their -O3 optimization flags and m68k FTBFS).
Steve Langasek wrote (replying to me):
>> # Wine still hasn't been updated to new JACK, despite an RC b
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:47:26 +0200 Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Something like a BSD-style license should be fine but the lack of
> "copyleft" might be disliked by the author.
My top recommendations:
Expat (a.k.a. MIT) http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt
2-clause BSDhttp://www.gnu.org
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:11:09AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It appears that the KDE transition is totally tied up to the jack transition,
> via arts. I see no plausible way to break this linkage.
I agree, and don't see any value in trying to find one, since there
don't seem to be any sign
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:12:33PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:47:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I plan to send the following mail about removing non-free
> > documentation to d-d-a tomorrow. I would welcome if people would
> > check it for factual mistakes be
Current version can be found at
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:32:01AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since one of our release goals for etch is to remove any non-DFSG-free
> > documentation from main he
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:47:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I plan to send the following mail about removing non-free
> documentation to d-d-a tomorrow. I would welcome if people would
> check it for factual mistakes before I do so.
Did you intentionally limit the scope to documentation,
It appears that the KDE transition is totally tied up to the jack transition,
via arts. I see no plausible way to break this linkage.
The JACK transition is currently waiting for fltk1.1, thanks to zynaddsubfx
and spiralsynthmodular. But there's little point in breaking that link,
because...
Th
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:54:56AM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > When I try, for example, capplets-data, it apt-get wants to remove
> > capplets. Why?:
> > capplets: Depends: capplets-data (= 1:2.8.2-3) but 1:2.10.1-6 is to be
> > installed
> O
Matthias Klose wrote:
> The point of reassigning the report to an unknown package is to ask,
> if it's time to drop m68k from the release architectures or just set
> the severity of all m68k reports to wishlist. There's currently nobody
> interested in forwarding m68k related bug reports upstream a
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> When I try, for example, capplets-data, it apt-get wants to remove
> capplets. Why?:
> capplets: Depends: capplets-data (= 1:2.8.2-3) but 1:2.10.1-6 is to be
> installed
On this particular issue, I think this is because this is sup
Testing includes, as of the past few days, a bazillion packages not
installable on powerpc.
I have not check each one of these in detail.
The following packages have been kept back:
bug-buddy capplets-data dia-common dia-gnome dia-libs eog evolution
file-roller galeon galeon-common gcalctool
16 matches
Mail list logo
