On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:12:33PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:47:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I plan to send the following mail about removing non-free > > documentation to d-d-a tomorrow. I would welcome if people would > > check it for factual mistakes before I do so. > > Did you intentionally limit the scope to documentation, or did you have > any non-free content in mind? #214623 for example was ignored for sarge > but is concered with non-free images rather than documentation. If you > want to include these types of bugs, I'd recommend an editorial change > s/documentation/data/g.
True, but most of this data is the documentation and I want to get that message across above all for now. Plus I don't have any clue how to search for non-free data in any automated manner since there aren't any common non-free "data licenses" that I know of. I will not change the formulations for this mail but I will definetly try to come up with a statement about non-free data in one of the next release updates. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]