* Adeodato Simó [Wed, 03 Nov 2004 02:47:36 +0100]:
> I'm reuploading those same packages
I don't know what kind of messages one gets from katie after a t-p-u
upload, but sure I didn't expect a "kdebindings_3.2.3-2_i386.changes
is NEW".
it marks libqtc1 and libkdec1 as NEW, which is true
hi, following the plan outlined in [1], a t-p-u upload of kdebindigns
was due to fix #274989 and make fixing #274779 possible.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/10/msg00090.html
Riku Voipio made the upload a week ago, but it was rejected because of
some old binary packag
* Andrew Pollock [Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:57:21 +1100]:
> reassign 244768 ftp.debian.org
> retitle 244768 Please remove lprngtool
> thanks
cloned as 279431, tags = sid, severity = serious.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
A celebrity is a person who works hard all
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:22:17AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
> While I do understand that debian 3.1 is the most important things most
> of you are working on, I would like to bring your attention to the
> actual status of libc6-dev and specifically on the incoherences that
> exists between the
Hi,
While I do understand that debian 3.1 is the most important things most
of you are working on, I would like to bring your attention to the
actual status of libc6-dev and specifically on the incoherences that
exists between the pthread related includes, the dynamic libpthread.so
library an
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 02:04:54PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I haven't been able to think of anything the powerpc, mips, and mipsel
> platforms have in common that would explain why xerces should not be
> built there but should be built on all other archs; but to be safe, I
> hope Graham teste
reassign 244768 ftp.debian.org
retitle 244768 Please remove lprngtool
thanks
Hi ftpmaster, debian-release,
I've had lprngtool up for grabs in WNPP for some months with no interest.
I've pinged all the people with open bugs, and those that replied all said
they could live with it being removed com
> I tried to ask Ryan about this at one point on IRC, but the message could
> easily have gotten lost. I haven't been able to think of anything the
> powerpc, mips, and mipsel platforms have in common that would explain why
> xerces should not be built there but should be built on all oth
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:00:21AM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Graham Wilson (also in debian-xml-sgml-devel) has kindly uploaded a
> powerpc binary of xerces24 thus allowing it to presumably transition
> to testing today. The long-standing situation of xerces23 and
> xerces24 being bogusly in
Moin!
* Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041031 11:13]:
> From all the others i would like to hear who considers to come to a
> BSP.
I'll try to attend; if you like, I can try to organize rooms at my
university in Frankfurt Main / Germany
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
signature.asc
De
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041102 10:05]:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041101 22:05]:
> > Package: kernel-image-2.4.27-netwinder
> > [...]
> > Version: 2.4.27
> > [...]
> > Depends: initrd-tools (>= 0.1.32), coreutils (>= 5.0), modutils (>= 2.4.15)
> >
> > You can't install th
* Raphael Goulais ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041102 10:30]:
> Can you please hint attal and attal-themes-medieval into sarge ? They both
> depend on each other ...
Hinted. Thanks.
(BTW: If it would be possible to laxen depedencies a bit, so that it
could go in automatically, that would be great.)
Ch
Hi,
Can you please hint attal and attal-themes-medieval into sarge ? They both
depend on each other ...
Thanks in advance,
Raphael
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041101 22:05]:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:00:00PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I think it is sufficient if the kernel is in sarge, e.g. 2.4.27, which
> > is above 2.4.24. Of course, this should be tested with exactly the
> > kernel that is in sarge.
> Pac
14 matches
Mail list logo
