On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:22:17AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote: > While I do understand that debian 3.1 is the most important things most > of you are working on, I would like to bring your attention to the > actual status of libc6-dev and specifically on the incoherences that > exists between the pthread related includes, the dynamic libpthread.so > library and also the fact that a different pthread implementation is > chosen in static (linuxThread) and dynamic (NPTL) mode.
The only release-relevant thing I can see here is that it's not a release-critical bug. Thank you for bringing it to my attention so that I could downgrade it. :-) (The grave severity implies the package is unusable, which libc6-dev isn't; it doesn't seem to fit any of the criteria for serious bugs in the release policy, either.) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
