pppconfig 2.3.7: translations only

2004-10-13 Thread John Hasler
I've just uploaded pppconfig 2.3.7. The only changes it contains are translations, so it can go into Testing. -- John Hasler

Re: Brazil Summer Time

2004-10-13 Thread GOTO Masanori
At Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:50:44 -0300, Rosilene Oliveira wrote: > I'd like to know if there is a version to convert the time of > application Debian 3.0 to Brazil summer time. > We use the version 3.0, its time has changed to summer time, but here, > in Brazil, we haven't changed the time yet. It wi

Re: Bug#237370: pgp5i

2004-10-13 Thread Marco d'Itri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:06:58PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: >> Can you explain what is pgp5 able to do which gnupg and the IDEA plugin >> do not support? >In theory, nothing. Some people on debian-security thought gpg had >problems with some keys, but couldn't cite anyt

mime-tools, readline5, gcc-3.4

2004-10-13 Thread Matthias Klose
- please move mime-tools to testing, see #276262, a new upload with priority high would need more time. - readline5 entered testing without being installable. please either move readline4-4.3-13 to testing (which may not be possible to the introduction of a new package libreadline-common) or

Re: status of non-US

2004-10-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Ian Beckwith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041013 15:35]: > > As nothing has been uploaded to non-US/non-free since before the > > compromise, I suspect it hasn't been reenabled yet. > Exactly. But we need to update non-US before release of

Brazil Summer Time

2004-10-13 Thread Rosilene Oliveira
Hi, I'd like to know if there is a version to convert the time of application Debian 3.0 to Brazil summer time. We use the version 3.0, its time has changed to summer time, but here, in Brazil, we haven't changed the time yet. It wil change at November 2nd. I wait for help. Thank's Rose -- Ros

Unidentified subject!

2004-10-13 Thread Pune/SNS . SNSTECH
"Thank You For Sending Your Resumes Across. We will contact You if We find Your Profile suitable to the job vacancies we have"

Re: status of non-US

2004-10-13 Thread Ian Beckwith
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 03:54:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:30:24PM +0100, Ian Beckwith wrote: > > I suspect, since the crypto-in-main move, that crypto no longer needs > > to live in non-US/non-free, and could move to non-free. > > No, this is not the case. > >

Re: Bug#275324: flac: new upstream source available

2004-10-13 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 11:52:35AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > I don't think this is an issue for the sarge release, myself. I'd much > > rather have a well-tested 1.1.0 in sarge than try to force in 1.1.1 when it > > is obviously a m

Re: Bug#275324: flac: new upstream source available

2004-10-13 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > severity 275324 wishlist > thanks > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:20:43AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > We have a problem. It seems that FLAC 1.1.1 is not exactly "just an > > update": > > > > 1) It changed a lot of APIs (so we need

Re: status of non-US

2004-10-13 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:30:24PM +0100, Ian Beckwith wrote: > I suspect, since the crypto-in-main move, that crypto no longer needs > to live in non-US/non-free, and could move to non-free. No, this is not the case. The expert restrictions which prompted the non-US archive still exist, they hav

Re: Bug#275324: flac: new upstream source available

2004-10-13 Thread Matt Zimmerman
severity 275324 wishlist thanks On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:20:43AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > We have a problem. It seems that FLAC 1.1.1 is not exactly "just an > update": > > 1) It changed a lot of APIs (so we need a new soname for some of the libs) >(i.e. they changed so

Re: status of non-US

2004-10-13 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ian Beckwith ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041013 15:35]: > As nothing has been uploaded to non-US/non-free since before the > compromise, I suspect it hasn't been reenabled yet. Exactly. But we need to update non-US before release of sarge. > I suspect, since the crypto-in-main move, that crypto no lo

Re: pgp5i

2004-10-13 Thread Ian Beckwith
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:06:58PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Can you explain what is pgp5 able to do which gnupg and the IDEA plugin > do not support? In theory, nothing. Some people on debian-security thought gpg had problems with some keys, but couldn't cite anything concrete. However, peopl

Re: status of non-US

2004-10-13 Thread Ian Beckwith
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I can imagine that there are more candidates than the ones in > non-US/non-free now. Indeed. I maintain ckermit, and would like to enable the crypto options, which would mean a move to non-US/non-free. > A while ago, I offered to