On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:07:24PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I can imagine that there are more candidates than the ones in > non-US/non-free now.
Indeed. I maintain ckermit, and would like to enable the crypto options, which would mean a move to non-US/non-free. > A while ago, I offered to sponser a package which was in woody, but > which has since been pulled from the archive. It sat in non-US/non-free. > This is the only reason why it didn't happen; I can obviously not upload > a package to a non-working archive. Ah, that would explain why nothing happened with the pgp5i upload I got my sponsor to make. I mailed ftpmaster at the time with no response, I'll get my sponsor to try again and then I'll file a bug. As nothing has been uploaded to non-US/non-free since before the compromise, I suspect it hasn't been reenabled yet. I suspect, since the crypto-in-main move, that crypto no longer needs to live in non-US/non-free, and could move to non-free. I asked on debian-legal with no firm consensus. see http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/01/msg00294.html I also filed a bug (#258278) against nonus.debian.org, with no response yet. Ian. -- Ian Beckwith - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://nessie.mcc.ac.uk/~ianb/ GPG fingerprint: AF6C C0F1 1E74 424B BCD5 4814 40EC C154 A8BA C1EA Listening to: Swans - Soundtracks for the Blind - Helpless Child
