It won't stop me from accepting, but it would be good if
debian/mark_private_symbols.sh had copyright/license information for the script
in it.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
config.tests/mmrenderer/mmrenderertest.cpp:** Copyright (C) 2013 BlackBerry
Limited. All rights reserved.
This copyright holder doesn't seem to be addressed in debian/copyright.
Please fix on the next upload.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
I'm about to accept this, but one small note:
W: kxmlkipicmd: spelling-error-in-description allows to allows one to
Please fix in the next upload.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On Wednesday, May 07, 2014 14:04:13 Xavier Brochard wrote:
> Le lundi 5 mai 2014 10:17:53, vous avez écrit :
> > On Monday 05 May 2014 10:58:35 Xavier Brochard wrote:
> > > Sorry, misunderstanding. What you want is marble without KDE
> > > dependencies,
> > > right ?
> > >
> > > A workaround, woul
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 18:52:31 Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Hello. You say it is not a hard depends, but
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.html#control
> says to use Depends "if your program absolutely will not run (or will
> cause severe breakage) unless a particular package
On May 11, 2014 10:34:41 AM EDT, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
>On 5/11/14, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Sunday, May 11, 2014 18:52:31 Shriramana Sharma wrote:
>>> Hello. You say it is not a hard depends, but
>>> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/dreq.en.h
I'm going to go ahead and accept this, since it doesn't immediately affect
what licenses can be used, but a number of files in the package are not
simple LGPL 2.1+, but LGPL 2.1/3.0 + other KDE.ev might approve:
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under th
Maintainer request.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Monday, May 26, 2014 10:24:53 Yunqiang Su wrote:
> With this patch, It can build on mips64el, amd64, i386 without symbols
> warning.
Qt5 5.3.0 is being uploaded to experimental. Patches, if needed still, would
be more useful against 5.3 than 5.2.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-r
Source: marble
Version: 4.13.1-1
Severity: important
There are many upstream copyright assertions for recent years that do not
occur in debian/copyright. Licenses all seem to be present, so this isn't
RC, but it should be updated.
~/marble/marble-4.13.1$ grep -ir copyright *|grep 2014
src/mac/In
On Monday, June 02, 2014 18:34:41 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Package: pykde4
> Version: 4:4.12.2-2
> Severity: serious
> Usertags: goto-cc
>
> During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using
> cowbuilder and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
>
> [...]
> --
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:50:44 +0100 Salvo Tomaselli
wrote:
> Package: phonon
> Version: 4:4.8.0-3
> Severity: critical
Not on a release arch, so not RC. Adjusting severity accordingly.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
bluez-obexd (Closes: #771116, #771293)
+
+ -- Scott Kitterman Sun, 30 Nov 2014 17:52:59 -0500
+
bluedevil (2.0~rc1-44-gb7697a7-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload to unstable
diff -Nru bluedevil-2.0~rc1-44-gb7697a7/debian/control bluedevil-2.0~rc1-44-gb7697a7/debian/control
--- bluedevil
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 20:26:19 -0500 Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> clone 769852 -1
> reassign -1 kde4libs
> thanks
There's a kde4libs piece to fixing this as well.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Do you have gpgsm installed? If not, please install it, try again, and let us
know if that solves it.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/119
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 01:20:01 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Followup-For: Bug #775894
> Control: severity -1 serious
>
> Hi,
>
> after the upgrade sequence lenny -> squeeze -> wheezy -> jessie the
> situation of rbqtapi is as follows:
>
> # l /usr/bin/rbqt*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root7 May 1
Packaging is generally good, but the upstream tarball is missing license
information to needed to make it distributable. The tarball includes a
copying file for LGPL 2.1, but much of the code is LGPL 2 (and not all of it
is 'or later', so a copy of the LGPL 2 also needs to be included.
Additional
Unfortunately I have to reject your package. The package contains licenses
and quite few copyright holders not included in debian/copyright.
This list is not comprehenise. I got a good chunk of the way through the
package (enough to know I'd have to reject it) and stopped. Please check
through
Unfortunately I have to reject this pacakge.
po/bg/kcompletion5_qt.po:# This file is licensed under the GPL.
There's neither mention of the GPL in debian/copyright nor a copy of the
GPL included in the upstream tarball.
The rest of the PO files appear to be LGPL (so not rejecting due to them)
Same reasons as 5.7.0.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
On Sunday, March 15, 2015 12:43:51 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I've poked around in core/libs/database/collectionmanager.cpp and it appears
> that the digikam code tries to do the right thing and the most likely issue
> is something about how solid handles these cases, so reassig
Unfortunately, I have to reject your package.
In cmake/FindModemManager.cmake the licensing says:
# Redistribution and use is allowed according to the terms of the BSD license.
# For details see the accompanying COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS file.
There is no accompanying COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS file. T
Unfortunately, I am going to have to reject your package.
As indicated in debian/copyright, some number of the files in the package are
licensed under LGPL2.0 (only), but the only LGPL version included in the
tarball is LGPL2.1. Any license in use in the package has to be in the
tarball to make
Unfortunately, I am going to have to reject your package.
src/syntax/data/m4.xml is licensed under the BSD license and neither the
license nor the copyright holder are mentioned in Debian copyright.
In addition, src/syntax/data/asm-avr.xml is licensed under the GPL and not
listed as such.
===
Obsolete version of package already rejected.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Obsolete version of package otherwise rejected.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Monday, May 18, 2015 03:13:26 PM Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am upstream and debian maintainer of "relational".
>
> The last release uses Python2 and Qt4. I am trying to
> switch to Python3 and Qt5.
>
> The software uses some non-ascii symbols such as ᑌ ᑎ.
>
> I have done a full co
The package includs a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2.1, but the code references
LGPL2 as well. I'm not going to reject for this missing license this time,
but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debi
The package includs a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2.1, but the code references
LGPL2 as well. I'm not going to reject for this missing license this time,
but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.de
The package includs a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2.1, but the code references
LGPL2 as well. I'm not going to reject for this missing license this time,
but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload please.
Additionally, cmake/Findepoxy.cmake says:
# Redistribution and use is
The package includs a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2.1, but the code references
LGPL2 as well. I'm not going to reject for this missing license this time,
but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.deb
The package includs a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2.1, but the code references
LGPL2 as well. I'm not going to reject for this missing license this time,
but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.de
The package includs a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2.1, but the code references
LGPL2 only. I'm not going to reject for this missing license this time,
but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian
The package includs a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2.1, but the code references
LGPL2 only. I'm not going to reject for this missing license this time,
but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian
The package includs no COPYING or COPYING.LIB file at all. It needs a COPYING
for GPL 2 and a COPYING.LIB for the LGPL 2. I'm not going to reject for this,
this time, but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next upload
please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-r
The package includs no COPYING.LIB or other full copy of the license. It needs
to have COPYING.LIB for LGPL 2.. I'm not going to reject for this missing
license this time, but coordinate with upstream and get it fixed for the next
upload please.
Scott K
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-
I am going to accept your package, but there are issues that need to be
addressed in debian/copyright in the next upload:
The main issue is the mislabeling of the "Intel License Agreement For Open
Source Computer Vision Library" as BSD-3-clause in debian/copyright. While it
is extremely similar,
On Monday, June 22, 2015 08:25:04 AM Eric Valette wrote:
> On 22/06/2015 04:25, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > Of course. The problem is that KDE needs Qt 5.4.2 in unstable first and
> > that's delayed due to an internal compiler error on gcc 4.9 on armhf.
>
> I'm not even talking
The package needs at least a bit of updating for debian/copyright. Although
not reject worthy, I noted the following 2015 copyright dates are not listed
in debian/copyright:
kcoreaddons-5.11.0/po/ca/kcoreaddons5_qt.po:# Copyright (C) 2014-2015
This_file_is_part_of_KDE
kcoreaddons-5.11.0/po/pt_BR
I am going to accept this package, since, while the license statements in
many of the po files are a bit of a mess, I don't think it's completely
unclear what the intended license is. Here's a sample:
po/gl/kauth5_qt.po:# This file is distributed under the same license as the
PACKAGE package.
po
dewebkit
+ widgets, private/animablegraphicswebview, and widgets/webview
+- Drop libkdewebkit5 binary package
+- Build plasma3 without webkit
+- Update install files (verified header files that are no longer shipped
+ are not used elsewhere in Debian)
+
+ -- Scott Kitterman M
Package: kde-standard
Version: 5:102
Severity: normal
Debian ought to be making barriers to using encryption as low as we reasonably
can. If you attempt to set a preferred gpg key in kmail without kleopatra
installed, it fails with a very unhelpful error message.
Rather than improve the error me
On January 15, 2019 7:17:36 AM UTC, Pino Toscano wrote:
>In data lunedì 14 gennaio 2019 12:22:52 CET, Scott Kitterman ha
>scritto:
>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2018 14:04:12 -0300 Lisandro
>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dami=E1n_Nicanor_P=E9rez?= Meyer
> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 17 Oct 201
Copyright statements for The Qt Company Ltd in the package are 2016 and 2017
vice 2015 and 2016 as listed in debian/copyright. Please update this for
your next upload.
Scott K
These files are described as public domain internally. This should be
mentioned in debian/copyright:
examples/quick/demos/photosurface/resources/icon.png
src/quick/doc/images/touchpoint-metrics.png
These files are BSD-2-Clause. The copyright holders are not in debian/
copyright (or in the cas
I am going to accept the package, but please address the following issues in
your next upload:
Do not ship the AUTHORS file in docs. Anyone who holds copyright on item in
the package has to be listed in debian/copyright (policy 2.3), which does not
seem to be the case here. As such, it's just pa
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 11:47:29 PM Carlos Kosloff wrote:
> Package: gwenview
> Version: 4:15.08.0-3
> Severity: important
...
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I did not do anything special, just tried to edit an image and noticed
> that all the edition capabilties: crop, resize, etc., were gone.
>
On September 22, 2015 2:58:04 AM CDT, MAG4 Piemonte wrote:
>Hi, we also have the same problem with version 4:5.4.1-1 ...
This is currently known not to work. I'm trying to sort out what needs doing
to get it working on Debian.
In the meantime, a totally unsupported work-around is to grab the
On Thursday, September 24, 2015 06:17:41 PM Christoph Pfister wrote:
> Package: ark
> Version: 4:15.08.1-1
>
> This is on a freshly bootstrapped amd64 unstable system:
>
> lxuser@debian:~$ ark
> ark.main: Error loading Ark KPart.
> lxuser@debian:~$
>
> (screenshot of the popup is attached).
>
>
Not all of the copyright years for Nokia and Canonical are mentioned in
debian/copyright. Please review and update for your next upload.
Scott K
On September 25, 2015 11:29:20 AM CDT, "Martin Steghöfer"
wrote:
>Dear kdelibs5-dev maintainers,
>
>One package I worked on is affected by this problem, too. That's why I
>started investigating this issue and found out that there is a whole
>bunch of packages that are currently (or were recen
On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 02:53:54 +0200 Alf Gaida wrote:
> Source: sddm
> Severity: normal
>
> Defaulting to sddm-theme-breeze | sddm-theme isn't sensible, please
consider to use not a kde centric theme as default
>From the perspective of the maintainers, it's quite a sensible default. It's
certa
ark (and other packages) will need to be rebuilt against the updated kservice
before this is really fixed everywhere, but this is the only explicit packaging
change needed.
Scott K
On September 26, 2015 10:05:58 AM CDT, Debianuser wrote:
>Package: libkf5emoticons5
>Version: 5.14.0-1
>Severity: normal
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>- I use Debian sid in the most recent version.
>- I have configured aptitude not to install recommended packages by
>default.
>- due to this configurati
Also there are a number of files that are License: LGPL-2+ in the package,
there is no copy of the LGPL included. Please work with upstream to add a
COPYING.LIB file to the package that includes LGPL-2, since that's the
version that's referenced specifically.
Scott K
On Sunday, October 11, 2015 11:41:49 PM Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi list
>
> My package qwtplot3d fails to compile on the arm architecture with the
> following error message:
> /usr/include/GL/glext.h:468:19: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef
> ptrdiff_t GLsizeiptr'
> typedef ptrdiff_t
On November 4, 2015 11:48:17 PM EST, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 04 2015, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
>> Please avoid reopening old bugs, it's better to ask in the debian-kde
>users
>> list or in the #debian-kde irc channel, if that wouldn't help then
>open a new
>> one. The issue t
On Wednesday, November 04, 2015 09:43:25 PM Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04 2015, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > Okular already Recommends cups-bsd, so reopening the bug that suggests it
> > be added makes no sense.
> Hi, Scott. I appreciate the response, but I
On December 15, 2015 7:32:49 AM EST, Eric Valette wrote:
>On 12/15/2015 07:29 AM, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
>> Anyway, despite Eric V's advice to jump to digikam 5, I went ahead
>and did a
>> local rebuild of digikam 4.14 and it seems to run fine.
>
>What's the benefice of taking this path? Deve
On December 25, 2015 5:12:41 PM CST, Salvo Tomaselli
wrote:
>Package: kget
>Version: 4:15.08.0+dfsg-1
>Severity: grave
>Justification: renders package unusable
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>upon trying to add links to kget, I get a notification saying that the
>protocol
>is not supported.
>
>Protocol
On Saturday, January 09, 2016 01:44:09 PM Peter Pöschl wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> what is the proper package to file a burgreport regarding the plasma desktop
> startup?
>
> On an amd64 system running Testing, when I hit Enter on the password entry
> of the sddm login screen (Elarun theme) one of 3 th
Package: kdevelop-python
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Here's the actual failure during configure:
-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python3 (found suitable version "3.5.1",
minimum required is "3.0")
-- Found Pyt
The relevant test has been updated in git, so it may take a git snapshot to
work with python3.5:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/extragear/kdevelop/plugins/kdev-python/repository/revisions/master/entry/parser/CMakeLists.txt
On Saturday, January 16, 2016 12:10:09 AM Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: kdebugsettings
> Version: 15.08.3-1
> Severity: serious
>
> kdebugsettings fails to build in unstable:
> > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.67.0 (26 Dec 2015) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux
>
> ...
>
> > [ 51%] Building CXX object
> >
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 10:03:45 PM Peter Pöschl wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> thanks for your prompt response.
>
> On Sunday, January 10, 2016, 16:01:56 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 09, 2016 01:44:09 PM Peter Pöschl wrote:
> > > what is the prope
On February 6, 2016 2:31:02 PM EST, Diederik de Haas
wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:23:27 +0100 Maximiliano Curia
>
>wrote:
>> Version: 0.9.8-4
>>
>> On 08/01/16 19:37, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> > Package: libindi
>> > Version: 0.9.7-1
>> > Severity: wishlist
>> >
>> > libindi has a build-depen
Uploader request.
Scott K
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
It's not something worth rejecting the package over, so I won't, but the
package description is really short. Please consider if there is more
information worth adding in a future upload.
Scott K
This is currently blocked from migrating to Testing by the Qt5.7.1 transition.
Eventually, we'll get there.
Scott K
On November 18, 2016 7:37:31 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Would it be possible to change the build dependency from libssl-dev to
>libssl1.0-dev for the time being to temporarily resolve this issue?
>
>It's rather ugly to have a library as central as kde4libs FTBFS because
>i
Source package renamed to ksyntax-highlighting since syntax-highlighting
seemed to generic.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
It says fix, not remove. This should probably be default-mysql-client-core
(unless this is through shlibs depends, in which case it will be
mariadb-client-core-10.0, when built against default-libmysqlclient-dev).
Scott K
On November 22, 2016 12:16:22 PM EST, "Sandro Knauß"
wrote:
>Hey,
>
The debian/copyright looks pretty good. I can tell a lot of effort went into
this package and it's a beast. Unfortunately, I am going to have to reject it
due to sourceless javascript:
N: Not used
O: qtwebengine-opensource-src source: source-is-missing
examples/webenginewidgets/contentmanipula
I am going to accept your package, but there is one debian/copyright issue
that should be fixed in the next upload. In tests/auto/blackbox/
tst_clangdb.cpp, the copyright attribution for Christian Gagneraud is missing.
Please add that for your next upload.
Scott K
On Saturday, December 24, 2016 11:01:30 PM Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Hi Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers!
> (cc Scott and Gianfranco)
>
> I made quite a few changes in update partitionmanager from version 1 to 3.
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/partitionmanager
>
> Changes:
> """
> * Update to
On Saturday, December 24, 2016 11:19:35 PM Jonathan Carter wrote:
> Hi Scott
>
> On 24/12/2016 23:06, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
> > On 24/12/2016 23:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> Did you test if it actually works correctly? That's been the key
> >
On Saturday, February 25, 2017 12:29:31 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> On sábado, 25 de febrero de 2017 14:03:31 ART John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian!
> >
> > I just gave it a try and khtml builds fine as is.
> >
> > Are there any additional tests you'd suggest
On February 26, 2017 2:15:25 PM EST, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
>On 02/26/2017 07:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> I don't insist on anything. I noticed that this package does not
>depend on
>> libssl after building and that is why I took a look.
>
>Interesting. So, I guess the
Package: kajongg
Version: 4:16.08.3-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
During the Buster development cycle Qt4 is going to be removed. As a
result, PyQt4 and PyKDE4 will be removed as well. This package depends
on python-kde4. If you want it to be part of the Buster release, it
will have t
Package: parley
Version: 4:16.08.3-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
During the Buster development cycle Qt4 is going to be removed. As a
result, PyQt4 and PyKDE4 will be removed as well. This package
recommends python-kde4. If you want it to be part of the Buster release,
it will have to
I am going to accept your package, but I did notice one small (non-fatal)
error in debian/copyright. The copyright year for
tests/auto/qml/qqmlxmlhttprequest/data/send_patch.qml is now listed as 2017
vice 2016. Please update your debian/copyright for the next upload.
Scott K
On June 25, 2017 7:24:58 AM EDT, ZevenOS wrote:
>
>Package: python-kde4
>Version: 4:4.14.3-2
>Severity: grave
>Justification: renders package unusable
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
> * What led up to the situation?
>Importing Plasma in python scripts throws an error
>
> * What exactly did you do (or
This bug also seems to make qtmultimedia5-dev uninstallable on sparc, which,
through a long series of interactions makes korundum unbuildable on sparc
which means libokularcore3 can't be decrufted on sparc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
I am going to mark this package for accept, but there are two copyright
holders missing from debian/copyright. Please fix on your next upload.
src/version.h.cmake: * Copyright (C) 2007 Sebastian Trueg
src/atticaclient_export.h.cmake:Copyright (c) 2011 Tudorica
Constantin-Alexandru
Scott K
I am going to mark this package for accept, but debian/copyright really needs
an update to list the current copyright holders/years. It looks like it was
last touched in 2010. If you grep -ir copyright * and look for any results
2010 and later, with the exception of the 2010 copyright of the debi
Source: qtwebkit-opensource-src
Version: 5.3.1+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (causes other packages to FTBFS)
>From the qtwebkit-opensource-src build log on kfreebsd-amd64 (it is the same
on kfreebsd-i386 and hurd-i386):
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol shm_unlink
Not a major issue, but please note the following and resolve it in the next
upload:
lintian check for qtenginio-opensource-src_5.3.1-1.dsc
W: qtenginio-opensource-src source: space-in-std-shortname-in-dep5-copyright
lgpl-2.1 with digia qt lgpl exception 1.1 or gpl-3 (paragraph at line 32
Similar to qtenginio-opensource-src, please address these for the next
upload:
lintian check for qtwebsockets-opensource-src_5.3.1-1.dsc
W: qtwebsockets-opensource-src source: space-in-std-shortname-in-dep5-copyright
lgpl-2.1 with digia qt lgpl exception 1.1 or gpl-3 (paragraph at line 1
There is an issue in copyright documentation that should be corrected for the
next upload. Since it appears to be an existing issue, I won't reject for
this reason.
GNU Library General Public License, version 2 (LGPL-2)
+ gstreamer/CMakeLists.txt
+ gstreamer/ConfigureChecks.cmake
Thes
This package has some debian/copyright issues, but they do not appear to
be new, so I'm not rejecting the package. Please fix in the next upload. The
package has a mix of LGPL 2 (the debian dir - which you ought to see about
updating to 2.1), LGPL 2.1 or 3, and LGPL 2.1 or LGPL 3, or KDE e.v. app
Is there a pattern about when it fails and when it doesn't?
When you filed this bug, you filed it at severity critical. In Debian,
critical
is defined as:
critical
makes unrelated software on the system (or the whole system) break, or
causes serious data loss, or introduces a security hol
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:40:48 +0200 Shai Berger wrote:
> Package: kmail
> Version: 4:4.11.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> KMail randomly marks single messages as unread. This makes my
> normal workflow, where I leave messages unread for
On November 1, 2014 12:52:01 AM CDT, "Jörg Frings-Fürst"
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>
>Am Samstag, 1. November 2014, 00:22:43 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>> Is there a pattern about when it fails and when it doesn't?
>
>No, only that I can sign 3 or 4 mail and then all o
On Friday, November 21, 2014 06:21:23 PM Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2014 21:29:25 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > 1. Move maintainership to qt4-perl package from Sune to debian-qt-kde
> > > team.
> >
> > I agree on the above mentioned plan.
>
> Sune, I cannot find qt4-perl repo in
The included cmake module is GPL-3+, but there's no GPL-3+ COPYING file
included. This is not strictly a rejection issue, so I am going to accept
the pacakge, but you should ask upstream to include a full copy of the license
in future releases.
Scott K
I had hoped to work on this this week. It hasn't happened and it's not going
to.
In the end, I the Qt4 stuff has to go, so I wouldn't wait on this for the
transition.
Scott K
On June 28, 2018 1:23:31 PM UTC, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
wrote:
>El miércoles, 27 de junio de 2018 16:
On Wednesday, July 25, 2018 09:46:45 AM Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:23:49AM +0800, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> > 2018-07-25 5:51 GMT+08:00 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
> >
> > :
> > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 at 14:04, Colin Watson wrote:
> > >> Simple enough: once you've inst
I'll work on this.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/ad1152e6-784d-4a18-9b1f-1f2364ae6...@email.android.com
evall
python-qt4 (U)
Michael Meskes
pykde4 (U)
Miriam Ruiz
calibre
Modestas Vainius
pykde4 (U)
Python Applications Packaging Team
veusz
Scott Kitterman
python-qt4 (U)
qscintilla2 (U)
Sune Vuorela
pykde4 (U)
Torsten Marek
python-qt4 (U)
qscintilla2
Waiting on the release team to approve a sip4 transition (#707239).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/342044200.q67sGHxnzs@scott-latitude-e6320
1 - 100 of 256 matches
Mail list logo
