On Monday, June 22, 2015 08:25:04 AM Eric Valette wrote: > On 22/06/2015 04:25, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Of course. The problem is that KDE needs Qt 5.4.2 in unstable first and > > that's delayed due to an internal compiler error on gcc 4.9 on armhf. > > I'm not even talking about unstable, even in experimental. Qt 5.4.2 is > already there so your argument doesn't hold. I'm talking about packages > stuck in the new queue and that has nothing to do with experimental or > unstable. > > > So we need a gcc fix to push to to be able to start pushing kf5. > > For unstable maybe. But if it was already testable via experimental this > would be great!
Lot's of things would be great, but we don't have time for all of them. Personally, I don't plan to put any time into Plasma 5 until after Kf5 is in Unstable (which means Qt 5.4.2 in Unstable). Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qt-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1901723.75Xkzn0SyO@kitterma-e6430
