Bug#190287: marked as done (wanpipe: bad defaults hardcoded)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line wanpipe has been removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#190288: marked as done (wanpipe: comments not treated as comments)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line wanpipe has been removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#132099: marked as done (wanpipe: Files in etc not marked as conffiles)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line wanpipe has been removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#127149: marked as done (/usr/share/tcltutor/Tcl28.lsn: inaccurate information)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:11:45 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#126139: marked as done (Tcl15.lsn: s/value end/word end<\/B>/)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:11:45 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#67359: marked as done (example in session 25 can't compile out-of-box.)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:11:45 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#156057: marked as done (timidity-patches: copyright file does not state which copyright applies to this package)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:15:31 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#124332: marked as done (Lesson window: arrows and page/{up,down} keys do not work)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:11:45 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#206590: marked as done (timidity-patches: could the package be split?)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:15:31 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#199359: marked as done (timidity-patches: The sound quality seems to be REMARKABLY reduced)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:15:31 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Bug#125909: marked as done (On exit, tcltutor insists to save a somewhat wrong geometry.)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:11:45 +1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Removed has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t

Processing of libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes

2003-09-25 Thread James Troup
libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to auric.debian.org along with the files: libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.dsc libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09.orig.tar.gz libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.diff.gz libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_i386.changes is NEW

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Installer
(new) libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.diff.gz optional non-free/perl (new) libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1.dsc optional non-free/perl (new) libmail-bulkmail-perl_3.09-1_all.deb optional non-free/perl Platform independent mailing list module Mail::Bulkmail gives a fairly complete set of tools for managi

Python2.1 dependency

2003-09-25 Thread Lee R. Shekter
Hi - I was trying to install linuxconf_1.26r4-2_i386.deb on "woody". I received an error that the package requires python 2.1. Well, my system has python 2.2 on it. Do I have to install python 2.1 as well? If not, how do I tell the package installer to use python 2.2, and if yes, how do I direct t

preferences_1.2.100-0.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: preferences_1.2.100-0.1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/preferences/preferences_1.2.100-0.1.diff.gz preferences_1.2.100-0.1.dsc to pool/main/p/preferences/preferences_1.2.100-0.1.dsc preferences_1.2.100-0.1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/preferences/preferences_1.2.100-0.1_i386.deb preferences_1.2

docbook-utils_0.6.13-3.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: docbook-utils_0.6.13-3.1.diff.gz to pool/main/d/docbook-utils/docbook-utils_0.6.13-3.1.diff.gz docbook-utils_0.6.13-3.1.dsc to pool/main/d/docbook-utils/docbook-utils_0.6.13-3.1.dsc docbook-utils_0.6.13-3.1_all.deb to pool/main/d/docbook-utils/docbook-utils_0.6.13-3.1_all.deb Annou

Bug#211617: marked as done (docbook-utils: should default to /etc/sgml/catalog for XML as well as SGML)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:17:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#211617: fixed in docbook-utils 0.6.13-3.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#162530: marked as done (ripperx: Does not work on pure devfs system )

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:47:19 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#162530: fixed in ripperx 2.6-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#205544: marked as done (Time to upgrade)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:47:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line acknowledge bugs fixed in NMU's has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#205751: marked as done (python-pmw: must be updated for python2.3)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:47:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line acknowledge bugs fixed in NMU's has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#158930: marked as done (python-pmw needs rebuilt against python 2.2)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:47:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line acknowledge bugs fixed in NMU's has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#205272: marked as done (python-pmw: Python-pmw is not installable in Debian Unstable.)

2003-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:47:51 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line acknowledge bugs fixed in NMU's has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re