Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line wanpipe has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 18:34:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 12:34:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk (blueyonder.co.uk) [195.188.53.121] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16XRSt-0006N4-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 12:34:11 -0600
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by blueyonder.co.uk  
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75);
         Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:34:10 +0000
Received: from localhost (unverified [62.30.104.135]) by 
pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.9) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:34:10 +0000
Received: from malcolm by localhost with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
        id 16XR1n-0003Tv-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:11 +0000
From: Malcolm Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wanpipe: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:11 +0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wanpipe
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7

wanpipe contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.

This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200201/msg02546.html

For details of which files in wanpipe are not marked as conffiles see
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tfile-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile.html

If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped
in the package.

If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked
as conffiles.

Example configuration files should be placed in 
/usr/share/doc/wanpipe/examples

See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information.


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 132099-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 04:16:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 22 23:16:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A1eao-0007ht-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:16:03 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 3006426B95; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 06:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id EF00CFECC; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: wanpipe has been removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_60,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
              SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Closing wanpipe's other bugs since the package has been removed from
Debian unstable.

----- Forwarded message from Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: why RC?
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100
To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0
        tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
              REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
        autolearn=ham version=2.55

On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 03:55:07PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Please remove wanpipe; it has been orphaned for a long time, doesn't
> have build-deps and is generally out of date; in #190619 the original
> maintainer said he'd request the removal but never got around to it.

This has been done now, so I'm closing this bug as no longer applicable:

=========================================================================
[Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:16 -0400] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
Removed the following packages from unstable:

   wanpipe |  2.1.1-2.2 | source, i386
Closed bugs: 179392

------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; orphaned, out-of-date, FTBFS.
----------------------------------------------
=========================================================================

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to