Your message dated Fri, 11 Apr 2025 13:22:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100760: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #661721,
regarding intersect with installed packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Thu, 13 Mar 2025 18:45:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1100371: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #889794,
regarding elpa-cider: should inject dependencies from Debian packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hello,
I am wondering if the following CVEs fixed in trixie would ever be
backported to future releases of bullseye and bookworm:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-38541
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-38564
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2
Kirill Rekhov writes:
> I wrote a script called chroot-debianizer that automates routine tasks related
> to Debian package management. This tool is designed to facilitate a clean and
> isolated package building process in chroot environments specifically for the
> amd64 architecture.
There are a
On Wednesday, February 12, 2025 10:51:13 AM MST Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That sounds like what the "debian_pipeline" workflow can do in
> https://debusine.debian.net, except that it is able to do it on multiple
> architectures and also run reverse dependencies autopkgtest (however it
> doesn't supp
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Kirill Rekhov wrote:
> I wrote a script called chroot-debianizer that automates routine tasks related
> to Debian package management. This tool is designed to facilitate a clean and
> isolated package building process in chroot environments specifically for the
> amd64 arc
Hi, Dear Debian Engineers.
I hope this message finds you well. Sorry for advertising my small project.
I use this script often when working with Debian packages.
I wrote a script called chroot-debianizer that automates routine tasks related
to Debian package management. This tool is designed to
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2025 16:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1093962: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #883777,
regarding multistrap: preinst runs after packages are unpacked
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libwlroots-0.18-dev 0.18.2-1
Bug #1091956 [src:wayfire] wayfire: FTBFS: Package 'lcms2', required by
'wlroots-0.18', not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:wayfire' to 'libwlroots-0.18-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions wayfire/0.9.0-5.
Igno
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libwlroots-0.18-dev 0.18.2-1
Bug #1091957 [src:wf-shell] wf-shell: FTBFS: Package 'lcms2', required by
'wlroots-0.18', not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:wf-shell' to 'libwlroots-0.18-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versions wf-shell/0.9.0+ds-
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 libwlroots-0.18-dev 0.18.2-1
Bug #1091955 [src:wayfire-shadows] wayfire-shadows: FTBFS: Package 'lcms2',
required by 'wlroots-0.18', not found
Bug reassigned from package 'src:wayfire-shadows' to 'libwlroots-0.18-dev'.
No longer marked as found in versio
Control: reassign -1 libwlroots-0.18-dev 0.18.2-1
Control: forcemerge 1091934 -1
On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 at 18:45:41 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jan 2025 at 18:09:04 +, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, [gamescope] failed to build:
>
Your message dated Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:01:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1058684: fixed in zfs-linux 2.2.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1058684,
regarding Packages zfs-dkms and zfs-fuse are mutually problematic
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 09 Dec 2024 13:49:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049515: fixed in libapache-mod-musicindex 1.4.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049515,
regarding libapache-mod-musicindex: Fails to build binary packages again after
successful build
to be marked as
Your message dated Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:27:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1087388: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #878858,
regarding please drop transitional packages libfilesystem-ruby,
libfilesystem-ruby1.8 and libfilesystem-ruby1.9.1
to be
Your message dated Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:53:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017816: fixed in golang-github-bsm-pool 0.8.0-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017816,
regarding golang-github-bsm-pool: Flaky test on i386, blocking other packages
migration
to be marked as done.
This
forwarded 1017816 https://github.com/bsm/pool/issues/4
thanks
Hello. I've just forwarded this upstream, but
maybe we should go ahead and remove the package.
It used to be a (build-)dependency for gitea, but gitea
does not exist anymore.
Thanks.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1017816 https://github.com/bsm/pool/issues/4
Bug #1017816 [src:golang-github-bsm-pool] golang-github-bsm-pool: Flaky test on
i386, blocking other packages migration
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/bsm/pool/
Your message dated Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:00:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1084750: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #530676,
regarding giggle: Shared libraries and headers should be split into packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 05 Nov 2024 22:19:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049659: fixed in catdvi 0.14-16
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049659,
regarding catdvi: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 19 Oct 2024 06:48:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049729: fixed in cal3d 0.11.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049729,
regarding cal3d: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
_init__.py (with unimportant variations):
__import__('pkg_resources').declare_namespace(__name__)
As
https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#pkg-resources-style-namespace-packages
says:
If you are creating a new distribution within an existing
variations):
__import__('pkg_resources').declare_namespace(__name__)
As
https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#pkg-resources-style-namespace-packages
says:
If you are creating a new distribution within an existing namespace
package that uses this method t
Your message dated Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:42:10 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Build shared library packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #911821,
regarding Build shared library packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Mon, 20 May 2024 09:49:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049554: fixed in aspic 2.00+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049554,
regarding aspic: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 09 May 2024 07:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049680: fixed in freedink-dfarc 3.14-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049680,
regarding freedink-dfarc: Fails to build binary packages again after successful
build
to be marked as done.
This means that
I had a look at this issue, and the cause is in src/Makefile.am, which
intentionally list several files both in both dfarc_SOURCES and
BUILT_SOURCES. The problematic files are generated but stored
in the tarball to save a build dependencuy (wxglade).
I am not sure how to avoid this problem, and l
Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:35:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049841: fixed in propellor 5.17-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049841,
regarding propellor: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:36:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1068156: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049648,
regarding tk707: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 09 Mar 2024 11:15:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1065703: fixed in libident 0.32-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065703,
regarding t64 transition broke build of other packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
against those packages, severity serious. This is at least about:
efingerd: #1065100 (maintainer Cc'ed)
ngircd: #1065101 (maintained by yours truly)
If those test rebuilds had been done, the following error could not have
been overseen (for efingerd, likewise n
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:08:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1060855: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049477,
regarding nxcl: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
the packages so as to make installing both
the OpenZFS and ZFS-FUSE implementations on the same system difficult,
possibly by adding mutual Breaks: to the packages in question.
NOTE: This bug report probably applies equally to both zfs-dkms AND
zfs-fuse; however, I don't see any simply way to
Your message dated Fri, 01 Dec 2023 01:19:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049736: fixed in gxmessage 3.4.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049736,
regarding gxmessage: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:57:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1054406: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049720,
regarding gtick: Fails to build binary packages again after successful build
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:34:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#383803: fixed in apt-listchanges 4.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #383803,
regarding apt-listchanges: Incorrectly assumes that binary packages from the
same source share NEWS files
to be marked as done
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:34:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#478188: fixed in apt-listchanges 4.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #478188,
regarding apt-listchanges: Please provide option to set all installed packages
as seen
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 07 Oct 2023 21:34:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#383803: fixed in apt-listchanges 4.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #383803,
regarding apt-listchanges: mishandles different NEWS.Debian files in different
binary packages built from the same source
to be
Your message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2023 21:34:28 -0400
with message-id <62ca9509-8540-459f-9e45-0e9d2f175...@kamens.us>
and subject line Re: apt-listchanges: provide searchable string between
packages and possibly preload search string
has caused the Debian Bug report #369051,
regardi
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:31:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051718: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #770542,
regarding debdry: add support for Java packages with
javahelper/maven-debian-helper/mh_make
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:31:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1051718: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1040322,
regarding debdry: should not ship test data in
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/control
to be marked as done.
This means
I have a fix pending which merges changelog entries which are _entirely_
identical, which I implemented as part of addressing bug #383803, but I
gather that fix won't work here. If I'm understanding correctly, the
issue discussed here is the content of the changelog entry being
identical but th
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2023 09:05:43 -0400
with message-id <8b18cd22-e48a-4d0d-a36a-621132fb4...@kamens.us>
and subject line Re: tag moreinfo 926175
has caused the Debian Bug report #926175,
regarding apt-listchanges: only a single changelog is shown when multiple
packages are upda
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1037374 [src:giggle] giggle: build-depends on transitional package
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1037374: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037374
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow.
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:22:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1049654: fixed in oxygencursors 0.0.2012-06-kde4.8-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1049654,
regarding oxygencursors: Fails to build binary packages again after successful
build
to be marked as done.
This
Source: wxedid
Version: 0.0.21-4
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful
sion} unused, but is defined
> # only call dh_scour for packages in main
> if grep -q '^Component:[[:space:]]*main' /CurrentlyBuilding 2>/dev/null; then
> dh_scour -plibghc-propellor-doc ; fi
> dh_md5sums -plibghc-propellor-doc
> dh_builddeb -plibghc-propellor-doc
> dpkg-de
Source: ap-utils
Version: 1.5-5
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful b
Source: gxmessage
Version: 3.4.3-1
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successfu
Source: cal3d
Version: 0.11.0-8
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful b
Source: eigenbase-farrago
Version: 0.9.0-3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
s
Source: gtick
Version: 0.5.5-3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful bu
Source: freedink-dfarc
Version: 3.14-5
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
succe
Source: catdvi
Version: 0.14-14
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful b
Source: oxygencursors
Version: 0.0.2012-06-kde4.8-4
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source)
Source: tk707
Version: 0.8-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful buil
Source: aspic
Version: 2.00+dfsg-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successfu
Source: libpgf
Version: 7.21.7+ds-2
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successf
Source: libapache-mod-musicindex
Version: 1.4.1-3.1
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source)
Source: libquvi-scripts
Version: 0.9.20131130-3
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) afte
Source: nxcl
Version: 0.9-4
Severity: minor
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-binary-20230816 ftbfs-binary-after-build
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-doublebuild
Hi,
This package fails to do build a binary-only build (not source) after a
successful build
synaptic I tried to upgrade it but it ranted throwing a long
list of packages it wanted to uninstall, such as colord, gparted,
haruna, gufw, etc, however when I check those 4 they have been
upgraded correctly and moreover do not show any dependency with
sysv-rc-conf !
* What was the outcome of this
Processing control commands:
> block 1040468 with -1
Bug #1040468 [kytos-sphinx-theme] kytos-sphinx-theme: broken symlink:
/usr/share/kytos_sphinx_theme/kytos/static/bootstrap ->
../../../../lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx_bootstrap_theme/bootstrap/static/bootstrap-3.3.7
1040468 w
/static/bootstrap ->
../../../../lib/python3/dist-packages/sphinx_bootstrap_theme/bootstrap/static/bootstrap-3.3.7
(kytos-sphinx-theme-common)
Current python3-sphinx-bootstrap-theme ships bootstrap-2.3.2 and bootstrap-3.4.1
cheers,
Andreas
Package: debdry
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
debdry creates a control file in its test suite. This file happens to
get installed into /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/control and this
happens to cause an undeclared file conflict with python3-kombu. I'm
filing this with debdry, becau
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2023 13:19:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#878688: fixed in lua-bitop 1.0.2-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #878688,
regarding please drop transitional packages liblua5.1-bitop0 and
liblua5.1-bitop-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:04:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1026457: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #569831,
regarding debget: doesn't handle 1:N source:binary packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
/bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
Versions of packages ghostscript depends on:
ii libc62.35-4
ii libgs10 10.0.0~dfsg-6
ghostscript recommends no packages.
Versions of packages ghostscript suggests:
ii ghostscript-x 10.0.0~dfsg-6
-- no debconf
Source: golang-github-bsm-pool
Version: 0.8.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org
https://ci.debian.net/user/britney/jobs?package=golang-github-bsm-pool&suite[]=testing&arch[]=i386
https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/golang-github-bsm-pool/testing/i386/
The test
usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/conf/urls/__init__.py)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system admin
Source: python-restless
Version: 2.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220624 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> mak
Processing control commands:
> tags 966223 +unreproducible
Bug #966223 [unar] Cannot install without wiping other packages
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
> notfound 966223 1.10.1-2
Bug #966223 [unar] Cannot install without wiping other packages
No longer marked as found in versions unar/1.
Sid.
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
On Sat, 25 Jul 2020 05:51:34 +0800 =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson
wrote:
> Package: unar
> Version: 1.10.1-2+b6
>
> With sid:
> # aptitude install unar
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> unar{b} (D: gnustep-base-runtime, D: l
Not sure why I didn't try the suggestion out before file the bug:
sudo mkdir /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cdist/preos
sudo chmod 755 !$
$ cdist preos
Available PreOS-es:
$
:])
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cdist/preos.py", line 111, in commandline
cls.preoses = find_preoses()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cdist/preos.py", line 62, in find_preoses
for preos in find_preos_plugins():
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cdi
Your message dated Sun, 21 Nov 2021 19:04:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994305: fixed in libkdtree++ 0.7.1+git20101123-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #994305,
regarding libkdtree++: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:35:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994350: fixed in python-djvulibre 0.8.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994350,
regarding python-djvulibre: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in
sid/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:19:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994347: fixed in python-bsddb3 6.2.9-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #994347,
regarding python-bsddb3: Removal of the python3-*-dbg packages in sid/bookworm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: src:python-djvulibre
Version: 0.8.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pydbg-removal
Python 3.8 upstream now has a common ABI for normal and debug
extension builds, so we can drop the python3-*-dbg packages.
Details at
https
Package: src:python-bsddb3
Version: 6.2.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pydbg-removal
Python 3.8 upstream now has a common ABI for normal and debug
extension builds, so we can drop the python3-*-dbg packages.
Details at
https
Package: src:libkdtree++
Version: 0.7.1+git20101123-5
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pydbg-removal
Python 3.8 upstream now has a common ABI for normal and debug
extension builds, so we can drop the python3-*-dbg packages.
Details at
https
Your message dated Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:48:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#992188: fixed in alien 8.95.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #992188,
regarding alien: Fails to create packages that place files in /usr/local
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: alien
Version: 8.95.4
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@despairlabs.com
Dear Maintainer,
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
We build a number of local packages installing to /usr/local in a
chroot, creating a tarball, then running alien to produce a .deb file.
Since bullseye
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jul 2021 23:24:51 +
with message-id
and subject line RE: BAQ
has caused the Debian Bug report #891893,
regarding jtb: groupId change in jtb-1.4.12-1 causes other packages to FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
A somewhat related issue is that libraries installed by debian-installer
is marked as manually-installed - see bug#742977
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep pr
Every unexpected behavior is a potential bug. We shouldn't close this bug
yet. Nicholas, are you still seeing this behavior?
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Wed, 07 Apr 2021 20:18:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#985808: fixed in alien 8.95.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #985808,
regarding alien: cannot convert aarch64 rpm packages to arm64 deb packages
(patch included)
to be marked as done.
This means that you
amd64
Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-1025-aws (SMP w/16 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages alien depends on:
ii cpio 2.13+dfsg-
usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/__init__.py)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system admin
ls' (/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/setuptools/__init__.py)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a sys
Source: zope.proxy
Version: 4.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200501 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> dpkg-buildpack
Source: zope.i18nmessageid
Version: 5.0.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200501 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/ru
Source: zope.interface
Version: 4.7.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20200501 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot debian/rules cl
Hello,
To package maintainer and/or uploader from
Sorted out package(s) with this fatal testing migrations issue(s)
Not built on buildd: arch X binaries uploaded by X
and/or
Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by X,
a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration
https://tracke
Hello,
To package maintainer and or uploader(s) from
Sorted out packages with this fatal testing migrations issue(s)
Not built on buildd: arch X binaries uploaded by X
and/or
Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by X,
a new source-only upload is needed to allow migration
https
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 936358 normal
Bug #936358 [src:cwiid] cwiid: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Bug #942981 [src:cwiid] cwiid: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> severity 938473
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Debian QA team does not have capacity to port python2 packages or
> maintain them
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> # bumping to RC packages with python2 removal bugs from this query
> #
> https://bugs.deb
he rdeps before
> dropping packages, at least evaluating if breaking things is alrightif
> he really likes to break packages :/
You mean check *better*. Because I do carefully check each time, as much
as I can, but in this occurrence, it looks like I didn't check well
enough. Mistakes unfort
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity #936189 serious
Bug #936189 [src:bcfg2] bcfg2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
> severity #937165 serious
Bug #937165 [src:nss-pam-ldapd] nss-pam-ldapd: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
Severity set
Your message dated Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:48:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#929850: fixed in dhelp 0.6.26
has caused the Debian Bug report #929850,
regarding buildd.debian.org: possible conflict between the "dhelp" package and
the KDE packages on debian buster
to be mark
1 - 100 of 618 matches
Mail list logo
