On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 12:05:51PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Hm, I found out why I didn't have any problems: The German pages let
> you still download the old version...
>
> Argl!
>
> That means you get different versions dependant on the "preferred
> language" setting in your browser.
*urgl
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
Whenever I am uploading some package for our QA team dinstall marks the
bug as fixed. Somebody always has to come back and close them by hand
which is just stupid work I would like to skip.
Attached is a simple patch to dinstall which should fix th
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:11:02PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Attached is a simple patch to dinstall which should fix that problem.
This time for real :)
cu
Torsten
Index: dinstall
===
RCS file: /cvs/ftpma
Hi Adrian,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 02:23:47PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>* Upload sponsored by Tony Mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Do you want to take over the package once you are an official maintainer?
In that case I would suggest you change the maintainer field in the
contro
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:32:06AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> when I do an upload for Debian QA I do inform you before. I'm wondering if
> it's possible to agree that everyone who wants to upload a package for
> Debian QA sends a short note to this list before he starts working to
> avoid duplicat
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:39:49PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> I think this is the normal behaviour of the people from the QA Team
> already to first announce the upload and then do it really. So I would
> say that the agreement is already there. :)
I have to admit that I forgot to announce t
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 12:57:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Remove chimera completely from Debian
> chimera is an old nonfree browser and it's (DFSG-free) successor is
> already packaged as chimera2.
Seconded.
> Move xmap-[d|s]motif to project/orphaned
> xmap-[d|s]motif are nonfree packages th
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 10:55:14PM +0200, Pavel V.Epifanov wrote:
> The symptoms are:
> [...]
Exactly the same here. Apart from real player sometimes sucking all my
memory etc.
No idea what's going on. Happens without the installer as well :(
cu
Torsten
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:31:19PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> while I'm not new on www.debian.org it's the first time I send something
> back to Debian's people. So excuse me, if I took the wrong addressees for
> this mail and give me an advice I can follow next time ... OK?
This probably b
Hi m2-,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:50:35PM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> I was just watching a discussion on #debian-devel and the subject of QA
> has come up yet again.
Seems like that happens from time to time :)
> The questions that pop up are basically the same as always, namely, h
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:29:29PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> I have the latest debhelper installed...
> The build fails with the error below:
I am fixing this right now.
Greetings
Torsten
pgpIr0TJ0Ww1q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 07:50:53PM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> severity 61448 serious
> thanks
>
> sipp fails to build due to attempting to use an egcc compiler, which doesn't
> exist on i386 or mips, and probably most other architectures. This should
> be changed to gcc.
Question: Did anybody u
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 10:44:56AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Question: Did anybody use this package at all? Seems like it exists in
> > Debian since 1998 but there was only a single bugreport in that time
> > (in case the archive lasts long enough). Can we agree that this package
> > can be rem
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 04:20:12AM -0500, Mettedraq wrote:
> I wanted know what package contains the file svga_drv.o
I don't know of a package including that file. None of our current
versions does contain that file.
> nonetheless what happened is I would use xf86config to configure my sys
Hi Jeff,
[Cc'ed to qa, so that nobody refixes this at the next bug party]
Just wanted to tell you that I prepared an upload for htmldoc
fixing this bug. You can find it at
http://people.debian.org/~torsten/htmldoc/
Changelog entry:
htmldoc (1.8.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> As some of you may know, there is a "QA committee". See
> http://qa.debian.org/people.html It currently consists of:
>
> * Raphaël Hertzog
> * Christian Kurz
> * Torste
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:02:26AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> Absolutely. The 'help' tag can only really be useful if it's widely
> known which bugs are tagged with it. Unfortunately it's not quite as
> easy as I thought to harvest them automatically using the LDAP interface
> to the BTS, as it d
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:39:22AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ldapsearch -P2 -x -H ldap://bugs.debian.org:35568 -b
> > 'ou=Bugs,o=Debian Project,c=US' keywords=*help* subject
>
> That's almost exactly what I was trying earlier. Thanks for implementing
> this!
Frustrating
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:51:59PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 05:30:28AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > Frustrating. There are 1001 bugs tagged "patch"...
>
> Hey, that's better than 1001 bugs tagged "wontfix" :)
>
Hi Colin,
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:13:28PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> Martin (Joey) Schulze and I were talking on IRC about how to make QA
> work more public. Joey was looking for something he could report in DWN
> about QA's progress and the progress of the release, partly because good
> QA
Hi Bas,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> mosml#111560, filed: 129, changed 129
I can't believe it. This was the software I ITP'ed when I joined Debian.
It is actually quite nice but it uses GPL parts and links non-free
parts to i
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> # 87431: O: ilu -- Inter Language Unification system
I doubt anybody is really using this. It is a big mess and there
are better alternatives. And the potato version did not really work
iirc (I was the maintainer for a while but n
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:18:24PM +0200, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > * #143030: smupsd should not release with woody
> ---> I did my statement according to this package which was introduced
> and orphaned by myself. It is not a target for woody but I would
> love to see it in Debian
Hi Folks,
I took a look at Anthonys oldbugs.txt
(http://master.debian.org/~ajt/oldbugs.txt) and decided to have a go at
tkman. Expect a new upload sometime this week. It might happen that I
don't have the time this week and I am on vacation next week but thereafter
I will have something ready I
Hi Anthony,
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:14:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>Package: tkman
>Maintainer: Debian QA Group
>[ADOPT] Adopted by Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>2884 tkman doesn't use /var/catman
Sorry, you got me wrong there. As I
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 09:05:09PM +0100, Nikita Schmidt wrote:
> Package: ispell
> Version: 3.1.20-0.6
> [...]
> The patch below works around this problem by detecting glibc and choosing
> termios instead of termio. It may not be an optimal solution, but at least it
> fixes the problem on Linux/A
Hi *,
Today I had some time so I decided to investigate the problems with
tkman and learned that it does not work correctly on my system :( It
might be normal for this tool to resize the vertical slider all the
time but I do not expect that.
I looked at the homepage of the author and realized th
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 07:09:44AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > . Maybe re-use /etc/X11/config?
>
> Eeks, no! That would be far too confusing. We only just got rid
> of it.
I am being dumb but - really: Why was this file removed? I liked the
scheme... I really can't understand what
On Sat, Apr 24, 1999 at 02:46:16PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I don't see whay intent to NMU is neccessary to be sent to -qa, but okay.
> A message to the BTS counts as a personal e-mail to the maintainer.
I think it is nice for every member of QA what the others are doing. Apart
from that some
On Sun, Apr 25, 1999 at 12:12:22AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I think it is no excuse if the maintainer says he will soon have the
> > time to make a new upload.
>
> I think that is a good thing when we give maintainers time to do sth,
> since that way we reduce our workload and 'force' maint
On Mon, Apr 26, 1999 at 11:00:42PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> So I would like to ask, if the members of the QA-Team should have the
> right to close bug-reports if they are fixed or they fix them? Maybe we
> should limit this to bugs older than x month and I would suggest x=3.
> What do the o
Hi again
Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address
to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on
-devel so I think it would be a good thing because
a) This messages often stay unanswered on -devel and
b) we have the people with the knowledge to
On Sun, May 02, 1999 at 02:13:42AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Just another thought about qa: Should we make it the official address
> > to send help requests from developers? I did not see many of this on
> > -devel so I think it would be a good thing because
>
> NO! That's what debian-me
On Sun, May 02, 1999 at 12:46:05PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> I don't understand the people from QA to be better, but I think that if
> a developer needs help to fix a bug and sends an email to debian-devel
> the chance of answer seems less than if he would write to debian-qa. I
> think so, b
On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 10:56:28PM -0400, JS Bournival wrote:
I am sorry but this is not the forum for this kind of help. Please post any
further questions to debian-user where it belongs
(debian-user@lists.debian.org). Thanks.
> [...]
> How can it be? I installed the rest of it with this same C
> From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Package: cdwrite
>
> I've been playing around with xcdroast and it has cdwrite 2.1 in it's
> sources. Debian still has version 2.0.
AFAIR xcdroast had cdwrite in its sources and extended it. So they bumped the
version number. I do not know about cdw
severity 3439 fixed
thanks
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 03:33:05PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> From: Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]
>
> Could you confirm if bug 3439 is present in the new shadow login?
I looked into the sources. There is no call to tcsetattr or ioctl in
login.c
Hi there,
As the quality assurance slowly gains speed I think we should make a "real"
section for it on our homepage and make a link there. Currently there are some
resources for QA but this is only known to few people.
For example there is a list of bugs older than 2 years (sic!) generated and
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 06:41:20PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Possibly a new candidate for project/orphaned, and getting withdrawn?
I would say so, yes. But somebody had a problem with cdrecord while cdwrite
was working (it's with the other bugs of cdwrite). As long as it works - leave
it alone
On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 04:32:15PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> So it is. Thanks for the response!
No problem :)
I was just looking for some old bugs to fix. Hmm, I think we need a filter in
the BTS to select packages where current version and the version the bug is
reported against does
Hi *,
As we are moving towards release of potato and we have a bunch of release
critical bugs I think we (the qa-team) should put some work into it. I think,
the best way to coordinate this, is a weekly meating on irc.debian.org. I
propose we open a new channel #debian-qa for this.
The problem
Hiho!
Today I again worked on some minor quirks (currently working on a patch) and
noticed that my patch against mawk still did not make it into the package. I
do not like working without any effect! It should at least help some Debian
user!
I think we need a standard place for packages fixed by
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 07:34:57PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Maybe James is a little bit busy and forgot to apply and make a new
> release to fix this bug? Have you asked him, why he didn't applied your
> patch?
I asked him on irc. He told me he would look at it at the weekend (that was 3
m
Hello James,
This is a really late answer but I was sick on Saturday and decided to let the
computer switched off on Sunday...
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 09:58:59PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
First of all: I am sorry for my previous mails on this thread. I really
sounded like an idiot in those mail
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 11:52:04PM -0700, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> What's the difference between Q&A and -testing?
Simple. The Q&A team is fixing bugs while the -testing team tries to uncover
hidden bugs :-) We wade through all the old bugs and sometimes clean up a
package (ppp for example).
c
On Thu, Jun 03, 1999 at 08:58:10PM -0400, Dennis Payne wrote:
> Since I maintain xwpe (not the debian package but the program itself), I
> decided to check the bug reports on it. The deleting of files from
> mounted DOS drives is caused by a bug in the cleanup routine for autosave
> and emergency
Hi there,
> Package: gnotes
> Version: 1.10-1
> Severity: important
>
> The gnotes package needs some adaptions for libgtk1.2 and glib1.2 --
> it doesn't compile anymore with them.
This is already fixed in the version in potato. I am just uploading the next
upstream release (1.61) but it was fix
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 09:47:44AM -0400, Dennis Payne wrote:
> The new version of xwpe is available on the xwpe web site:
> http://www.rpi.edu/~payned/xwpe/
> That should fix the delete problem. (The version number is 1.5.18a)
Just a note: Where did you get this library?
AC_CHECK_LIB(mytinfo
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 09:47:44AM -0400, Dennis Payne wrote:
> The new version of xwpe is available on the xwpe web site:
> http://www.rpi.edu/~payned/xwpe/
> That should fix the delete problem. (The version number is 1.5.18a)
I am just compiling the new package. Expect an upload in the next h
On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 01:24:02PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Not needed - Matej Vela already done it :)
Yep - I noticed when my upload failed ;)
cu
Torsten
On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 04:12:17PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> This thread sucks in a very special way. Instead of *doing* QA it
> is discussed about not very important meeting techniques.
Hehe - I did not put very much time into this thread. There was very little
discussion. I don't think i
On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 11:19:27AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> [please respect the Reply-To: header]
Done :)
> Though I have not yet witnessed any other type of withdrawal,
> I think the QA Group manager can do this with several packages, too.
Hmm - so who is our QA group manager?
cu
Torst
On Sun, Jul 04, 1999 at 02:24:36PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It has been closed (i've done it) but the severity fixed comes from the
> automatic job that dinstall does. It has detected that it was a NMU so it
> changed the severity instead of closing it. :-)
Who is maintaining dinstall?
Hi David,
Thanks for working on ispell - according to the qa list you are doing a great
job.
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 02:28:14AM +, David Coe wrote:
> I received the following comment from the upstream author. I haven't
> decided yet what to do about this, but will do so soon. If you have
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 09:00:50PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The virtual package is on the official virtual packages list, so this
> should be added to cucipop's control file:
>
> Conflicts: pop3-server
> Provides: pop3-server
>
> TIA!
Working on it.
Torsten
On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 10:46:23AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> They need to be able to read and write the files in
> /var/spool/mail/$VIRTUAL_DOMAIN/, but the best way to do that is to make
> the files owned by group mail, and make them group writable (like the
> normal system mailboxes).
>
>
On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 10:20:15AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> The main problem was cucipop's group for virtual mail spools. Whatever
> _user_ it used before should have been fine -- I don't know what that
> was though :-)
It was vpop... cucipop tried to get the uid of "vpop" which failed of
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 02:32:03PM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
> Christophe(thanks!) expressed his intention to orphan the mmm package.
> I've already made packages based on the latest MMM and OCamlTK
> experimentally, but since I'm not an official maintainer, I can't
> upload it by myself.
Hi Galen,
When going through the release critical bugs list I noticed that your
"textutils" package has a lot of open bugs. As it is part of the base
system I think we should get that straightened out.
There are many bugs which are very old on the list so it seems you do
not currently have the
tion
> Debian Release: potato
> Kernel Version: Linux jcn206a 2.2.12-int2.2.11.2 #3 Fri Aug 27
> 10:02:05 CEST 19 99 i586 unknown
>
> Versions of the packages textutils depends on:
> ii libc6 2.1.2-0pre11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
Torsten Landschoff for the Debian QA Group
pgp3PM5jVrYIv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> Hi there,
Hi Masayuki,
> Christophe(thanks!) expressed his intention to orphan the mmm package.
> I've already made packages based on the latest MMM and OCamlTK
> experimentally, but since I'm not an official maintainer, I can't
> upload it by myself. So I'd like to ask someone to NMU it
Hi Torsten :-)
> I have debianized the newest available version of grace which should fix
> most of the bugs mentioned in the BTS. I have contacted the maintainer
> Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> but he did not respond. Since I am
> not an official developer I cannot upload the package. Can
Hi Adam,
Quoting your bugreport at http://bugs.debian.org/28704:
> I volunteer to do NMUs for SGML packages to help the transition...
Would you indeed do this? I would like to do it but I have no knowledge of SGML
and do not use the packages. I think it should be done by somebody how uses it.
I
so I had to install it on a
machine with modem, configure it and so on.
It seems that is another problem of Debian - we have a lot uploads without
proper handling of the bug reports so the bug list is growing all the time.
Please help us to fix that.
Thanks
Torsten Landschoff for the Debian QA Group
thing like
closes: #12345, #35002
to your changelog and use a current dpkg-dev. This will tell dinstall to close
those bugs when processing your upload.
Please help us improving the quality of Debian.
Thanks
Torsten Landschoff for the Debian QA Group
On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 07:10:53PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I have version 2.1 of gpg-rsaidea package ready, which fixes all
> outstanding bugs against gpg-rsa and gpg-idea packages, making them
> actually usable, and completely Policy compliant.
>
> The ("Severity: grave", IMHO) bug about unr
Hi *,
I am leaving for another week of vacation today. I will not be able to read
my mail or do any work related to Debian. Please feel free to NMU all my
packages in case that is needed.
Also I want to say that a new ILU version is out and I did not yet have the
time to package it. I am going
}
Hope this helps. As I often heard that the patches did not come through,
you can also get this patch at
http://pclab.ifg.uni-kiel.de/~torsten/colortail.diff
Hope this helps
Torsten Landschoff for the Debian QA Group
On Sat, Oct 09, 1999 at 09:26:58PM +0900, Masayuki Hatta wrote:
> Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> also said he was willing to
> maintain it, but we met some difficulties and now he's gone for vacation...
Did I say that? Sorry, but I am currently quite busy and as I inves
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 01:36:35PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > I do not speak french also. Perhaps Raphael could help?
>
> What should I precisely do to help ?
We need to evaluate the license of ocamltk (right?). The english translation
seems to be non-free but perhaps the translation if wr
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 12:47:59PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Where (precisely) can I find this license ? I rapidly looked at
> www.inria.fr and didn't find it
Don't know - the last time I looked there the page was in french and I did not
understand anything. I am buried with work curr
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 05:31:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In fact there are four bug reports on sitecopy in the BTS; three of them
> complain about the ancient version (175 and 77 days old). There was no
> reaction by the maintainer nor did he merge the similar reports.
I think if a m
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 05:51:19AM +, Lazarus Long wrote:
> Renaming w.1.gz slave link from /usr/man/man1/w.1.gz to
> /usr/share/man/man1/w.1.gz.
> update-alternatives: unable to rename /usr/man/man1/w.1.gz to
> /usr/share/man/man1/w.1.gz: Invalid cross-device link
For me this sounds like a
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 07:19:51PM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
> Free
> This isn't exactly "free software" in the GNU sense, nevertheless:
> the source is available for free
> (binary versions are available for some platforms)
> anyone can use MMM for free
> a
Hi Michael,
I just did an NMU of bb to fix the slang dependency. As I did not change
anything apart from the changelog I think this should not be a problem
since it is merely a recompile.
cu
Torsten for Debian Quality Assurance
Hi Jim,
I was just looking through the release critical bug list and noticed that
6 of them are in your packages. As it seems you did not have the time
to work on them in the last weeks I offer you my help.
In case you do not even have time to answer this mail I assume that an upload
in the ne
On Sun, Oct 17, 1999 at 10:20:36AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> This is a problem of update-alternatives and your personal
> configuration. It seems like you put /usr/share/man on an other
No, only update-alternatives.
> partition then /usr/man and so it fails to create the symlink. Would you
On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 12:07:19PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Hm, if somethings just needs a recompilation, then contact the
> maintainer about this problem and offer your help to him. We don't need
> to open a task for jµst recompilation.
In fact I would suggest to just recompile and NMU if
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:55:16AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> It it still an NMU as you are not the maintainer of the package itself.
> If somebody does this with one of my packages without sending a notify
> to me before, I would be angry about it. If it's not your package, it's
> definitely
On Wed, Oct 20, 1999 at 11:05:23PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> You can't make an upload with unchanged source since you have to increase
> the version number.
There is a difference between changed source and changed source ;)
cu
Torsten
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 09:47:28AM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> Maybe, but it' still an NMU, only if it's for one architecture. Please
> kepp this in mind. And if you make a NMU, it doesn't matter what kind
> of, you first have to contact the maintainer about this.
I always contact the maintai
On Sun, Oct 24, 1999 at 09:29:36AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
>=20
> Can I ask if anyone took this up?
I am just downloading it. Will upload tonight.
Thanks
Torsten
pgpRZkbzKDKxw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Wichert, Vincent,
I was just working on the util-linux package to get the rc bugs fixed.
I was also looking at some old bugs when I stumbled across this:
> Observe:
>
> bash-2.02# hwclock --utc --set --date='Sun May 2 16:20:49 CEST 1999'
> bash-2.02# hwclock --utc --show
> Sun May 2 17:20:
Hi Ole, *,
I know there are a few upstream bugs in yagirc and another release critical
bug against the current package. As I wanted to fix that I went to the
yagirc homepage recorded at freshmeat and found the following:
05.09.99
OK, so it's been 6 months since the last update. Here's
On Mon, Nov 08, 1999 at 01:00:20AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Torsten has done the most recent work on this package -- will you
> look after this Torsten? Otherwise I am happy to. Also I noticed that
> your README.Debian says it uses user "man" not user "mail".
Just uploaded the new package.
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 10:50:53PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Closing it would be fine, since it's a debian-qa package.
Did that after getting the installed message.
cu
Torsten
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 10:00:03PM +, Lazarus Long wrote:
> Submitting a bug doesn't seem to take, bouncing the message generated
> (and cc'd to me) by the bug package doesn't seem to take, nothing
> seems to update the database. I'm not referring to the lack of a email
> acknowledgement, I'
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 07:52:16PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I personally think it should have been done long ago. (#34077)
>
> BTW someone should go through the bug list for bash and clean it up.
Matthias did great work. I have the new bash package compiled and will
try if an upgrade from sl
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 11:50:36PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > I think we should perhaps wait some days longer before finally uploading
> > it but an announcement to -devel(-announce) referencing a download
> > location might give the new bash a better testing before prime time.
>
> pleas
On Sun, Nov 21, 1999 at 12:04:25AM -0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since libdb2 is builtin in libc6, there is no need to depend on or even use
> it. Compile with latest libc and remove that dependency.
Just made a new release.
cu
Torsten
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 07:51:39PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> I am unable to package geg 1.0.1 and iptraf 1.2.1 because my hard disk
> died (a _physical_ death). I don't know exactly when I'll be able to
> buy a new one (I may have to wait until xmas) therefore NMU are
> welcome.
>
> There a
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 07:51:39PM +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Hello.
Hi Frederic,
> I am unable to package geg 1.0.1 and iptraf 1.2.1 because my hard disk
> died (a _physical_ death). I don't know exactly when I'll be able to
> buy a new one (I may have to wait until xmas) therefore NMU are
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 05:00:35PM +0100, laurent bonnaud wrote:
> here is the dangling symlink:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 23 Nov 3 10:09
> /usr/lib/snns/default.cfg -> debian/tmp/etc/snns.cfg
Okay - I am working on this.
cu
Torsten (for Debian Quality Assurance)
On Wed, Nov 24, 1999 at 09:38:27PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I'm on it (as a member of QA core team :)
>
> Expect bugfix upload by tomorrow.
Oops, sorry, I already took care of it. I wanted to post the answer to
the bugreport and this list but remembered that debian-qa will get the
mail as
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 09:38:46AM +, Alexander Koch wrote:
> Please read the URL http://www.us.vergenet.net/linux/cucipop/
> and think about including the segfault patch (I do not think
> it is included already) and the PAM patch.
I am working on it.
cu
Torsten
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:00:47AM +0100, Marcelo Magallon wrote:
> > > Package: gltt2 (main)
> > > Maintainer: Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 50596 gltt2: current version needs recompile.
> >
> > Can someone please recompile the package with the new libc?
>
> Please NMU,
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:45:34PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > bash will be ready when we release I am sure. He did another set of
> > packages and I will test them as soon as possible.
>
> Can any of us others test it, too? You know, you're not the only one
> with a machine which may be trash
On Sun, Dec 12, 1999 at 10:48:13PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Did that bot ever get written? I remember work being done on it
> during the last bug-squashing party.
In fact Robo101 (who is he in real life anyway?) wanted to finish the bot
while I would have done it as well. I never heard
does not
exhibit the memory leak on my system and I don't expect Xerox to adjust
the license of tcl2cc. Perhaps upstream could use another tool for it?
Anyway, I am now requesting the bug logs from the BTS and trying to do
something about them...
Thanks
Torsten
--
Torsten Land
m
> the old to the new page.
I would suggest doing all this stuff after potato is out. We have to
get the freeze done ;)
cu
Torsten
--
Torsten Landschoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Committee Member
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo