Hi,
I've just noticed the "custom" package on the release-critical bugs list,
and it has a screwed up Maintainer: field -- the address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it needs to be debian-qa@lists.debian.org (notice the
"lists." part). This must be fixed, otherwise bug reports don't go anywhere.
--
Digit
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 07:19:46PM +0200, Nils Lohner wrote:
> - figure out who owns and updates http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/ix/pseudopack
> ages.html so that we can add more pseudo packages to submit bugs against
The FTP admins, the master copy is available using anonymous rsync in
ftp-master.d
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 09:19:30PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote:
>
> http://tkman.sourceforge.net/
>
> Need I say more?
Someone's already packaging it.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 12:06:19PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> as far as I can see, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not getting redirected either
> here or to -devel. Ideally it should point to -devel, in order for
> people to see the ITPs, ITOs et al. Does anyone (Joy?) know of a
> reason why t
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 12:48:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The autobuilder found some missing build dependencies for asmodem:
>
> > xpm4g-dev
>
> I'm just preparing an upload fixing this at the moment.
BTW make that libxpm4-dev.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:14:21AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I'd like to change the way WNPP bugs have to be reported slighlty.
You might want to CC: the WNPP maintainers when talking about their stuff...
> Currently, the WNPP pages (the authority) suggest to send mail
> to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:03:56PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> There is currently a discussion on debian-devel whether packages with
> a Standards-Version < 3.0 should be included in the release of woody.
> I talked to a couple of maintainers with packages with an old
> Standards-Version and s
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 08:41:41AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Package: grafix-dev
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > or maybe conflict. dunno. anyway. here's log.
>
> [Summary for people on -qa:
> old package: grafix
> new packages: grafix1 (Replaces: grafix)
>grafix-dev (De
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:38:22PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 2.- Send email to every bug-sender with a text like this:
>
> Don't do this. You ought to at least have a look at the bug report
> before sending e-mail to people. I'd get annoied if I got a bunch of
> mail about bugs that could eit
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 08:52:41PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > The script is useful but please coordinate with http://lintian.debian.org
> > to avoid duplicated work.
>
> Unfortunately the lintian reports on that site appear to be out of date.
> Dated December 12, with reports to Richard Braa
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:20:24AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > clif -- C language interpreter [#68191]
> > * Orphaned 241 days ago
>
> Not true.
>
> It was orphaned on 2000-11-27, which is less than 50 days ago.
I think Martin's script just uses the date of the bug, not taking int
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:55:43PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > So, I'm going to apply for maintainer status, but it looks like I need an
> > advocate to verify my application. Any volunteers?
>
> I would certainly welcome people to apply to the NM process, or to
> help debian in any other way t
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:32:37AM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
> Apology, if this is a wrong place to ask. Please forward
> this to whom it may concern.
>
> I looking for a "tracking software". I have visited
> http://qa.debian.org/ and
> http://www.spi-inc.org/
> but I could not f
Hi,
The Maintainer: field of the kdestudio package has a broken e-mail address.
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:10:16 +0100
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EM
Hi,
I think someone needs to upload a new xxgdb and mark it as orphaned. Looking
at the state of the bug reports, there is reason to believe Helmut Geyer is
no longer interested, to say the least :)
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Thu, 1
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 01:13:32AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > - As mentioned before, I want to set up a CVS rep for such scripts
> > and for the WML (web) data. Yes, the QA web site sucks.
>
> [...] joy who is hopefully going to add QA's WML to the CVS rep.
I'm still desperately tr
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 02:13:14PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > - As mentioned before, I want to set up a CVS rep for such scripts
> > > and for the WML (web) data. Yes, the QA web site sucks.
> >
> > [...] joy who is hopefully going to add QA's
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 02:34:43PM +0200, Francesco Tapparo wrote:
> > >I'm italian, and I've contacted Fabrizio Polacco, but without any answer.
> > >I could do the NMU if there are no objection.
> >
> > Have a look back through the -private archives a month or two - if he
> > isn't back to resp
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 09:29:55AM -0700, Debian QA CVS wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/qa
> Module name: wml
> Changes by: joy 01/04/01 09:29:55
>
> Modified files:
> . : foo
>
> Log message:
> another test
I've set up logging for the QA CVS tree, it looks like this
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 06:06:38PM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > I've set up logging for the QA CVS tree, it looks like this message I'm
> > quoting. Currently it mails [EMAIL PROTECTED], a testing alias. Should it
> be
> > changed to the -qa mailing list?
>
> I'm beginning to be worried ab
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 05:06:17PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > Packages in main may not depend or recommend
> > stuff outside of main.
> >
> > See http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?list=withinmain&arch=ANY for the
> > list of packages that violate this.
>
> I in
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > It's nice to update the Standards-Version to something that includes
> > build-dependencies. Since the package is maintained by QA now, it's
> > reasonable to make this sort of change.
>
> Also: new upstream versions, closing bu
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 02:30:43PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > Anyway, I'd love to see daily lintian runs on stable again. Joy is
> > currently trying to get the lintian lab running again. If you want to
> > help, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What exactly is broken about the lintian runs right now?
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 03:07:35PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > The biggest issue is that the function that gets the names of the
> > source/binary packages does 'find /dists/foo -type f -name
> > *.dsc' to locate those files, which of course fails with the pool. We need
> > to parse the Sources
Hi,
Enrique, are you there? :) I sent one mail about <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
being broken already, a couple of weeks ago, no reply...
If anyone from QA would be so kind to NMU the acm package to change the
maintainer to the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> address (which doesn't bounce), I'd
be most grateful. The
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 06:05:40PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > > What exactly is broken about the lintian runs right now? How can I help
> > > getting them working again?
>
> > The biggest issue is that the function that gets the names of the
> > source/binary packages does 'find /dists/foo -t
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 07:01:25PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > What exactly is broken about the lintian runs right now? How can I help
> > > > getting them working again?
> >
> > > The biggest issue is that the function that gets the names of the
Hi,
Another way to fix this, with retaining the variable, would be to add this
to the top of the file:
MODULES_LOC ?= ..
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
reopen 91828 "Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tag 91828 - fixed
severity 93545 serious
severity 94577 serious
severity 91828 serious
tag 94577 + patch
merge 93545 94577 91828
thanks
One or more of these bugs need to be fixed -- MODULES_LOC should be either
removed or made useful by kernel
The Maintainer: field of the gtoaster package is broken.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Fri, 18 May 2001 04:08:55 +0200
Date: 18 May 2001 02:05:38 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 01:56:43PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > The Maintainer: field of the gtoaster package is broken.
>
> Yup it lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I still don't really understand why we did that change. Either you're
> working on -qa and you're inter
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 08:22:52PM -0700, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
> This e-mail bounced; just delete the page.
>
> - Paul
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Paul J. Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:10:32AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> > > > you have (unbeknownst to me) a Debian package for SWISH++.
> > > > However, version 3.0.3 is severely outdated. Please upgrade
> > > > the Debian package or simply delete it. Thanks.
>
> > Al Stone expressed his intere
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > > Anyway, I'd love to see daily lintian runs on stable again. Joy is
> > > > currently trying to get the lintian lab running again. If you want to
> > >
> > See lully.debian.org:/sda2/joy/ for all the files...
>
> Joy, Bas,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:59:06PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> Could you please post the attached as an NMU for the swish++
> package (I'm still working on finishing up the process of becoming
> a Debian developer)? It's not as fully tested as I would like, but
> it does seem to work. This is an upg
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:11:56PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> Package: xmotd
> Version: 1.14b3-2
> Priority: serious
I'll check this one out...
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 01:57:51PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Package: xmotd
> > Version: 1.14b3-2
> > Priority: serious
>
> I'll check this one out...
It was a simple HP-UX-ism. I've done some other fixes to the package and
uploaded it.
--
Dig
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:09:16PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> So, earlier today I installed Potato on 3 machines, configured them for X,
> run them for an hour or so and then upgraded to woody.
>
> Some issues:
I think you want the debian-testing mailing list, rather than debian-qa...
th
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 12:02:18PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> the QA committee doesn't really do anything.
Yes, I don't think we ever did anything as an entity. :)
> But, this is Debian, and things in Debian get done if people do it, not if
> someone defines our direction.
Especially not a
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:25:30AM -0400, Paul Wright wrote:
> I don't think you understand what Debian-QA is actually doing. If you
> would pay closer attention to the debian-qa list, you would discover that
> QA is responsible for making lists of work that can or need be done on
> packages th
Hi,
This has been going on for quite a while. Unless someone can reach thaths,
he should be considered MIA and his packages should be orphaned. :/
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 16:50:40 +0200
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001
Hi,
Someone should contact these three people whose mail bounces...
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 14:26:51 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery Syst
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:16:35PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea why the lintian reports are still down?
Bdale told me he'll set up the stuff on merulo, but some of the
prerequisites still aren't there.
Also, Shaleh still hasn't included the patches in official Lintian,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:33:13PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> osh (1.7-8) unstable; urgency=medium
>* Removed dependency on base-files (>= 2.1.6) since it's in potato.
That's hardly a reason to remove it; think about the poor people doing
upgrades from slink... :)
--
Digita
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 08:58:52PM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> > >* Removed dependency on base-files (>= 2.1.6) since it's in potato.
> >
> > That's hardly a reason to remove it; think about the poor people doing
> > upgrades from slink... :)
>
> I thought we only support upgrades from potato.
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 12:11:22AM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> Why http://lintian.debian.org/ goes to
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/ftplist?
It's due to a slight misunderstanding... the Lintian reports are still down,
anyway. Which reminds me, now that master has 42GB free and a lot of CPU,
I
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 12:48:31PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > 7. glimpse
> > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Has a grave security bug files now for almost 1.5 years (/tmp races).
> > Probably won't make it into woody anyway. Is the maintainer MIA?
>
> We currently need it for the
On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 06:13:58PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> now that master has 42GB free and a lot of CPU, I'll see if I can set up
> the [Lintian] reports there again.
>
> Unfortunately the machine where I put my Lintian lab patch died last
> night... we'll see.
I
On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 05:51:09PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> > > > 7. glimpse
> > > > Marco Budde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > > Has a grave security bug files now for almost 1.5 years (/tmp races).
> > > > Probably won't make it into woody anyway. Is the maintainer MIA?
> > >
> > >
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 08:47:12PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> Package: xinetd
> Version: 1:2.1.8.8.p3-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security woody
>
> This version of xinetd does NOT incorporate the 000 umask
> vulnerability patched in potato. To test this i created a fake telnet
> service which
On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 04:19:21PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> > You just have been registered to Litoo newsletter
> >
> > Your email is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Which idiot registered this address for this letter and with which
> purpose in mind? I would like to see [EMAIL PROTECTED] being
> un
Hi,
As the subject says.
For now they aren't being automatically updated since I still have to check
if the code that updates them is broken.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:09:20PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Lintian reports back on http://lintian.debian.org/
>
> Cool, thanks.
>
> Is there any chance of getting the raw data from lintian? (cf
> pandora:/org/qa.debian.org/data/lintian.txt). Could you put this
> on the web so a cron
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:21:02 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 15:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: missing maintainer
I'm having problems with the ftape-utils package, supposedly maintained
by Chri
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:08:18AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > tags #112850 unreproducible
> > severity #112850 normal
> > thanks
> >
> > first off, grave means it breaks other packages, important means the package
> > in question is basically useless. Since you can select wav files it's not
>
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 03:57:30PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > > 'reportbug' is right, one of grave's meanings is that the package is
> > > broken itself. Although if not everybody can reproduce that then it's
> > > not grave, as you say.
> >
> > And there's another reason why users shouldn't
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:52:09AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > There is one outstanding problem, which I might as well mention: if any
> > > package creates empty directories in /usr/doc, they won't be spotted (as
> > > those don't show up in the Contents files). I noticed a couple of
> > > ex
Hi,
At http://qa.debian.org/fhs.html there is no scoreboard even though one is
mentioned.
I'd meddle with this but I never touched it so I won't. :)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 11:13:08AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Package: mhonarc
> > Version: 2.4.9-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > Despite the beta labelling, MHonArc 2.5.0b2 is the primary download
> > offered at www.mhonarc.org. Additionally, it has been out for several
> > weeks with no c
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 08:29:54AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> File the wishlist bugs yourself,
s/wishlist/minor/
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 08:37:11PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >> en pt de pl fr es ja sv it hu
> >>
> >> no jp there
> >
> > What do you think ja is ?
>
> java? dunno
Think "Japan" and "Japanese"...
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Hi,
I was wondering, how come there isn't a kde-i18n-* package for all available
languages? I know that there are quite a bit of KDE translations for "hr",
but there's no package for it that I can see...
Not that I would use it :) but I have some clients that could be wondering
about it.
--
On Sun, Dec 16, 2001 at 09:30:46PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'm told that debian-qa-packages has now been created. Could
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] be pointed at that list instead of debian-qa,
> please?
I assume we have a consensus on this?
(Have to check.)
--
2. That which causes joy or hap
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 07:56:12PM -0800, Grant Bowman wrote:
> > > Why aren't these pages in the debian-wml CVS with the rest of the
> > > Debian WWW site? It is due to the PHP generated charts?
> > >
> > > http://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php
> >
> > They've always been in the qa.debian.org CV
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:30:23AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > This is because the lintian report it's based on hasn't been updated
> > > recently, partly because it's not clear if the automatic archive-wide
> > > lintian runs are working properly yet.
> >
> > Aren't they? Why? It should be a
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:40:16PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > They're already set up on master, but there are some outstanding buglets
> > > in the lintian reporting code. I think I mailed Joy a while ago with
> > > more details.
> >
> > It's still Broken(TM). Incremental runs are majorly br
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 12:03:21AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Sigh, I didn't realize full runs were broken too.
> >
> > Yeah. The current results on l.d.o show:
> >
> > Maintainers listed:728 (+0)
> > Source packages listed:3358 (+0)
> > Binary pac
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 09:50:53AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Please remove the following source packages plus their binaries from
> > unstable: tkmasqdialer gmasqdialer masqdialer mclient
> >
> > The packages have been orphaned for more than 1.5 months. The previous
> > maintainer wr
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:57:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > You're right, but you certainly shouldn't do uploads just for the sake
> > of changing the maintainer field. Fix the maintainer field with other
> > bugs (or lintian warnings or update to the latest policy) and then it's
> >
Hi,
I'd appreciate if someone could adjust the patch in #115625 to work with our
version of reformime in the stable maildrop package.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 02:18:26PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Description:
> cccd - A small GTK+ CD player program
> Changes:
> cccd (0.3beta4-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* debian/control:
> + Removed unnecessary Build-Depends libglib1.2-dev, xlib6g-dev,
> xl
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:44:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 02:18:26PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Description:
> > > cccd - A small GTK+ CD player program
> >
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 05:30:28AM +0100, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Frustrating. There are 1001 bugs tagged "patch"...
Hey, that's better than 1001 bugs tagged "wontfix" :)
Don't tell me how many of those are there... :)
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:39:12AM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > http://qa.debian.org/bts-help.html57
> > http://qa.debian.org/bts-security.html50
> > http://qa.debian.org/bts-unreproducible.html 260
> How to tag a bug right to get it listed here. I would like to
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:21:57PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> 3) Hide 'upstream' bugs. Supposedly, they are worked on by someone
>outside of Debian.
> 4) View 'upstream' bugs. Check whether they are already fixed upstream.
This upstream tag is hopeless... I have like fifty upstream bugs and
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:03:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> amp (0.7.6-7 to 0.7.6-8)
That should be "amp (0.7.6-7 to 0.7.6-8)", because the
anchor tag shouldn't be empty.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Delivery-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 14:23:04 +0100
Subject: exmlm
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1 required=5 tests=NO_REAL_NAME
Hi
this bug about wrong localtion of ezmlmrc repeats with every release.
Can
Hi,
I just ran strace on maildrop and it doesn't seem to include any kind of
fcntl*(*, F_SETLKW, *) call on the potato+sid machine. It seems I can
reproduce the bug on my sid machine too now, but it _does_ do the fcntl()
lock on it, yet mutt still bitches.
Downgrading maildrop to 0.75-2 makes mut
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 11:44:56PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > fwiw, it's available at http://cvs.debian.org/mia/README?cvsroot=qa
> > (Although I still think the procedure should be to mail -qa and someone
> > there doing MIA stuff takes care of the rest.)
> what do you think about thi
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:32:47PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>
> +Dealing with unreachable maintainers
> +
> +If you notice that a package is lacking maintenance, you should
> +make sure the maintainer is active and will continue to work on
> +their packages. Try contacting th
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 08:31:55PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Further to my previous message, I now have a debian package of wily which
> lintian appears to accept. Accordingly, I have advanced the package version
> by 0.1 (to 0.3). Please can you advise me where I should send the patch?
You should
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 02:24:04PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > I'm not a native English speaker, so I could possibly help
> > translating sth. into German?
>
> Yes. Joy, can you point him to a starting point for this?
You mean http://www.de.debian.org/devel/website/translating ?
--
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:32:16AM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
> (new) wily_0.13.41-0.3.diff.gz optional editors
> (new) wily_0.13.41-0.3.dsc optional editors
> (new) wily_0.13.41-0.3_i386.deb optional editors
> Changes: wily (0.13.41-0.3) unstable; urgency=low
> .
> * Fixes to packaging to m
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:46:27AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> tags 115625 patch
> thanks
>
> I'v adjusted the patch and now it doesn't clobber existing files.
> Then the bug may be closed, as the forementioned DoS is not feasible,
> and the clobbering problem is resolved.
>
> If there are any
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 06:33:40PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Anthony seems to select people he bother replying to. *Shrug*
>
> What would you do if you would get more mail you'd have to reply to
> than you can actually reply to?
Make announcements. :p
--
2. That which causes joy
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:32:06AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and
> repeatedly criticise the people doing the work of getting the release out
This work is not visible. It is irrational to expect people to be supportive
little sheep wh
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and
> > > repeatedly criticise the people doing the work of getting the release out
> > This work is not visible.
>
> Not everybody knows everything that happens. Sorr
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:13:32PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and
> > > > repeatedly criticise the people doing the work of getting the release
> > > > out
> > > This work i
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:23:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > > Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and
> > > > > repeatedly criticise the people doing the work of getting the release
> > > > > out
> > > > This work is not visible.
> > > Not everybody knows every
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:17:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > > > Do you really think that a "good attitude" is to continually and
> > > > > repeatedly criticise the people doing the work of getting the release
> > > > > out
> > &g
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 06:46:49PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > > nonus.debian.org 23780 nonus.debian.org: libssl-dev is obsolete [220]
> > > > (Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > ...
> > > Will non-us ever be fixed?
> >
> > It is but I'm afraid the bugs have not been closed. Hei
On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 09:32:55PM +0100, Sven Rudolph wrote:
>
> > Heiko Schlittermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the current maintainer and
> > it is his machine.
>
> Things are different. The machine is owned by and runs at Technical
> University of Dresden. As does {ftp,www}.de.debian.org .
> We
Hi,
How can one participate in this 'quality assurance'? I found some
packages that are orphaned but need attention, and done some work
on them to get them in shape. Does something special need to be
done to get in this group (yes, I subscribed to the list :)?
FYI the packages are xwpe, which I a
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 09:53:01PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Re-upload the known orphaned packages with the 'Maintainer' field
> set to: "Orphaned Package "
I've seen only 'Debian QA Group' (and variations) in Maintainer: fields
so far - isn't that more suitable? Users will be scared to u
. Torsten Landschoff
> . Christian Kurz
> . myself
> . Josip Rodin, future
Replace this 'future' with 'now', since I am a registered developer :)
Although only for a few months, but I learned most techniques of making
packages, and am willing to learn more.
>
On Sun, Mar 28, 1999 at 11:13:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Re-upload the known orphaned packages with the 'Maintainer' field
> > > set to: "Orphaned Package "
> >
> > I've seen only 'Debian QA Group' (and variations) in Maintainer: fields
> > so far - isn't that more suitable? Users
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 03:01:12PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > The tech committee has a private group debian-ctte-private.
>
> When I became a maintainer I heard only of one private list (which I was
> subscribed on), debian-private. Why isn't that address written somewhere?
On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > It would be a proper action to write to -devel that package x, y and z
> > > need a new maintainer and people who are interested should speak up.
> >
> > Yes, but by someone in position and who has every right to do so.
> > I wo
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:14:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> * Michael Dorman's packages that were affected, namely mailtools,
> xpm4.7 and mhonarc no longer have *any* open bugs!
I'd like a porter to recompile xpm source (which produces xpm4g,
xpm4g-dev and xpm4.7), so that we can v
On Tue, Mar 30, 1999 at 07:41:06PM +, Mika Fischer wrote:
> I've been accepted as maintainer on 14.03.99
> Is it normal, that including the key takes so long?
> Is there anything I can do to speed it up?
> I'd really like to upload something in the end :-)
You can mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
