On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > It would be a proper action to write to -devel that package x, y and z > > > need a new maintainer and people who are interested should speak up. > > > > Yes, but by someone in position and who has every right to do so. > > I wouldn't like to start pointing out bad maintainers on -devel. > > I'm not talking about bad maintainers but orphaned packages which is > different. Ok, one could find out which maintainers were affected > and compile it into a blacklist, but you can't change that.
It's just that I don't want to participate in that. > I also > don't want to see mails like "Joe Sixpack fails to maintain package xxx > so we need a new maintainer for it". Agreed. > > > The tech committee has a private group debian-ctte-private. > > > > When I became a maintainer I heard only of one private list (which I was > > subscribed on), debian-private. Why isn't that address written somewhere? > > Because it's new, I don't know it it's used, only half established > or some such. Yes, people told me that it is readonly for others? -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
