Re: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] Bug#652376: Removed package(s) from unstable

2011-12-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:51:49AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit : > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:35:30AM +0100, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > CC debian-qa, as the removal was RoQA. > > > > yes, eucalyptus is in bad shape, but its packaging team is not inactive, and > > the reason for not workin

Re: [pkg-eucalyptus-maintainers] Bug#652376: Removed package(s) from unstable

2011-12-17 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:35:30AM +0100, Charles Plessy wrote: > Hello Moritz, > > CC debian-qa, as the removal was RoQA. > > yes, eucalyptus is in bad shape, but its packaging team is not inactive, and > the reason for not working on version 1.6 is that we focus on 2.0, which we > can > not up

links to services from the pseudo-packages page

2011-12-17 Thread David Prévot
Le 15/12/2011 16:15, David Prévot a écrit : > Context: linking the wnpp page [1] the bugs [2] page. > [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ > [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ > I'm anyway CCing debian-qa also in charge of www.d.o/wnpp in > case someone may have another opinion (in such case, please

Re: UDD hint wanted: Who has closed a certain bug

2011-12-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Stuart, On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:20:29PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote: > > The 'done', 'done_name' and 'done_email' columns of the bugs and > archived_bugs tables are populated from the automatically generated email > that closed the bugs -- that email claims to come from the person who is