Le Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:51:49AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff a écrit : > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:35:30AM +0100, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > CC debian-qa, as the removal was RoQA. > > > > yes, eucalyptus is in bad shape, but its packaging team is not inactive, and > > the reason for not working on version 1.6 is that we focus on 2.0, which we > > can > > not upload yet as it needs the update of another package, gwt. > > > > I do not think that eucalyptus was blocking the release. Why did not you > > contact us before ? Was the removal so urgent ? > > Noone bothered to look into CVE-2011-2329, which is related to Eucalyptus, > for half a year.
Thanks a lot for the explanation ! -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111217082455.GA9292@chouca.igloo
