On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 08:35:30AM +0100, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hello Moritz,
>
> CC debian-qa, as the removal was RoQA.
>
> yes, eucalyptus is in bad shape, but its packaging team is not inactive, and
> the reason for not working on version 1.6 is that we focus on 2.0, which we
> can
> not upload yet as it needs the update of another package, gwt.
>
> I do not think that eucalyptus was blocking the release. Why did not you
> contact us before ? Was the removal so urgent ?
Noone bothered to look into CVE-2011-2329, which is related to Eucalyptus,
for half a year.
Reuploading Eucalyptus to the archive is easy, but you need to keep it in
shape on a continous base.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111217075149.GB3660@pisco.westfalen.local
