On 08:44 Tue 25 May , Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:27:37PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > >
> > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs
> > > to O/RFP. Since this was
Hi,
On Dienstag, 25. Mai 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> - 18 months delay may be shortenend to six monthes or 1 year, but I think
> that 3 months is too short, unless the goal is really to make people close
> their ITPs. I do not think that ITPs are discouraging people to contribute.
> In contrary
Le Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Xavier Oswald a écrit :
> On 08:44 Tue 25 May , Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > >
> > > - I think that it is better to close ITPs instead or retitling them RFPs,
> > >otherwise we will
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> More frequent pings, like every 3 months or maybe 2 even, OTOH, I'd say would
> be useful to stimulate the wanna-be maintainers to get the work done.
>From where I sit, the workload on -mentors and delay in RFS is a
pretty big bottleneck. P
On 25/05/10 at 18:08 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Xavier Oswald a écrit :
> > On 08:44 Tue 25 May , Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - I think that it is better to close ITPs
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:01:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I do not have a strong opinion on the subject (since I never browse the RFP
> > bugs), but I suggest to take the following threads and messages into account
> > before making a final decision:
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-pr
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:32:39AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I think RFPs are all but useless, and that an ITP does not automatically
> translate into an RFP anyway - a stale ITP may mean that the proposer is no
> longer interested in the package at all, not that they want someone else to
> pa
Le lundi 24 mai 2010 à 21:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs
> to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have
> been running it today with fairly conservative settings (18 months of
> inactivi
retitle 466682 ITP: emboss-kaptain -- graphical interface to EMBOSS using
Kaptain
owner 466682 !
thanks
Hi Lucas,
I think that there is a race condition in the system: I started to do some ITP
tidying after receiving the first round of retitlings, and the next day the
script was changing the tit
On 25/05/10 at 21:46 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le lundi 24 mai 2010 à 21:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs
> > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have
> > been running it to
On 26/05/10 at 10:01 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> I think that there is a race condition in the system: I started to do some ITP
> tidying after receiving the first round of retitlings, and the next day the
> script was changing the title of closed bugs, which is not such a big pro
11 matches
Mail list logo
