On 25/05/10 at 21:46 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > Le lundi 24 mai 2010 à 21:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > David Moreno Garza used to run a script that retitled old ITA/ITP bugs > > to O/RFP. Since this was a useful service, I reimplemented it, and have > > been running it today with fairly conservative settings (18 months of > > inactivity for both ITP and ITA). (the script is available in > > collab-qa/retitle-old-ita-itp -- it's not run by cron yet ; see #501257 > > for an example bug modified by the script) > > > > It seems to me that this 18 months delay is too much. I'm not sure if > > someone has done the data-mining for that, but I think that most > > "successful" ITP/ITA are processed quite fast (in less than a month). > > > > So, I'd like to run the script with more aggressive settings, like "3 > > months of complete inactivity" for both ITP and ITA. > > > > What do you think? > > Maybe just reverting to prior state : if RFP before ITP, then revert to > RFP, otherwise, if direct ITP, then close ...
That would indeed be the solution that makes the most sense. The problem is that "prior state" might be quite hard to determine. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100526061354.gb9...@xanadu.blop.info
