Le Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:58:37AM +0200, Xavier Oswald a écrit : > On 08:44 Tue 25 May , Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:37:45PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > > > - I think that it is better to close ITPs instead or retitling them RFPs, > > > otherwise we will perhaps accumulate a large number of inactive RFPs. > > > > I don't see a problem with that. Quite on the contrary, "loosing" info > > gathered during a failed packaging attempt could lead to double (wasted) > > work. So, I'd vote for retitling. > > +1
Hi again, I do not have a strong opinion on the subject (since I never browse the RFP bugs), but I suggest to take the following threads and messages into account before making a final decision: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/06/msg00299.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00587.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg00014.html (There may be more that I have not uncovered) Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100525090853.gg6...@kunpuu.plessy.org
