[±¤°í]Ãß°¡Áö¿ø ÇϽǺР14¸í¸¸ ¸ðÁýÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

Title: Untitled   모집기간 : 9월 3일~9월 29일 개강 : 10월 5일 / 교육시간 : 9 : 00 ~ 18 : 00 (월~금) "총교육기간 640시간-4개월" 지원자격 : 고졸,대졸 미취업자(재학생 중 졸업예정자 포함) ë˜

Bug#113473: korganizer changes permissions on existing files

Package: korganizer Version: 4:2.2.1-1.1 Severity: normal Hello. KOrganizer seems to change the permissions of existing ICal files. I have the following situation setup: There is a Calendar, calendar.ics stored on an nfs mount (call it /nfs). I've created a group called calendar and executed the

Request for Adoption

Hi, I'd like to orphan libtcl-ldap because: 1) last upstream was made in 1998 2) I don't use it anymore. Unfortunately I can't upload a new package with QA as maintainer in debian/control because libtcl-ldap doesn't compile against libldap2-dev .. see point nr. 2. Could you adopt it? Thanks in adv

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

Package: wily Version: 0.13.41-0.2 Severity: serious Tags: woody The wily package is extremely out of date and has several serious policy violations, one of which prevents the xlibs 4.1.0-6 package from being installed. Here's the output from a lintian run: N: Setting up lab in /tmp/lintian-la

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 10:27:55AM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote: [many lintian errors] > E: wily: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/doc/ Kamion, why isn't this package detected by the FHS script? -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in|| [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libliteclue_1.2.16-1.4_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: libliteclue_1.2.16-1.4.dsc to pool/main/libl/libliteclue/libliteclue_1.2.16-1.4.dsc libliteclue_1.2.16-1.4.diff.gz to pool/main/libl/libliteclue/libliteclue_1.2.16-1.4.diff.gz libliteclue1_1.2.16-1.4_i386.deb to pool/main/libl/libliteclue/libliteclue1_1.2.16-1.4_i386.deb liblitec

chpp_0.3.5-2.1_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: chpp_0.3.5-2.1.dsc to pool/main/c/chpp/chpp_0.3.5-2.1.dsc chpp_0.3.5-2.1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/chpp/chpp_0.3.5-2.1_i386.deb chpp_0.3.5-2.1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/chpp/chpp_0.3.5-2.1.diff.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 111774 Thank you fo

Bug#98347: marked as done (gprolog 1.2.1 is out)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:57:55 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#98347: fixed in gprolog 1.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#83493: marked as done (gprolog: interactive top level could use a menu file)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:57:55 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#83493: fixed in gprolog 1.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#113264: marked as done (libliteclue_1.2.16-1.3(unstable): missing build-depends)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:02:51 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#113264: fixed in libliteclue 1.2.16-1.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#96025: marked as done (gprolog: move from dwww to doc-base)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:57:55 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#96025: fixed in gprolog 1.2.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#111774: marked as done (chpp_0.3.5-2(unstable): missing build-depends)

Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2001 14:55:45 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#111774: fixed in chpp 0.3.5-2.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Processed: Re: Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 113496 - woody Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations Tags removed: woody > tags 113496 + potato Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations Tags added: potato > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#112645: xmailtool was withdrawn

Hello, I noticed your bugreport against xmailtool. This package was removed from Debian because no maintainer has been found for it since 1998. The package is still present in our "stable" distribution, but is no longer present in the "testing" or "unstable" distributions, and will not be part o

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

tags 113496 - woody tags 113496 + potato thanks On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 10:27:55AM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote: > Package: wily > Version: 0.13.41-0.2 > Severity: serious > Tags: woody > > The wily package is extremely out of date and has several serious > policy violations, one of which prevents

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

On Tuesday 25 Sep 2001 7:48 pm, Jordi Mallach wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 10:27:55AM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote: > > [many lintian errors] > > > E: wily: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/doc/ > > Kamion, why isn't this package detected by the FHS script? I suspect because it only exists in potato. I ca

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:48:40PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 10:27:55AM -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote: > > [many lintian errors] > > > E: wily: FSSTND-dir-in-usr usr/doc/ > > Kamion, why isn't this package detected by the FHS script? Because the FHS script only looks at

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

* Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010925 14:20]: > I realize that an enormously long Conflicts: line for xlibs would be > bad, but there should be relatively few packages which contained > app-defaults files and were removed between potato and woody. No, partial upgrades must b

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 02:20:38PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > If this prevents it from installing, perhaps xlibs could conflict with > those packages that have been removed rather than updated for the new > app-defaults arrangement? Otherwise it's going to be difficult to > achieve a clean upgrad

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 04:25:56PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote: > > Kamion, why isn't this package detected by the FHS script? > Because the FHS script only looks at unstable. Yeah, we noticed the package was stable-only. mhp said it should be removed from potato too, anyone against this? > There i

Processed: tags, reopen

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 70676 Bug#70676: Block instead of dash Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 70676 potato Bug#70676: Block instead of dash Tags added: potato > thanks, Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (

Bug#113496: wily: Numerous policy violations

On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 04:35:21PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I should *also* Conflict: with app-defaults using packages from potato > that have been abandoned in woody (all surviving woody packages migrated > to /etc/X11/app-defaults months ago). > > Colin, can you help me to come up with a