Re: removing gopher

1999-10-02 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 10:26:17PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > > [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client. > > It's another to distribute a non-free server.] > > I am not sure what you mean? Is a non-free server really bad? E.g. if a root exploit is made for a non-free server, we couldn'

Processed: dpkg updates

1999-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 44994 apt Bug#44994: dselect should use --fix-missing Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `apt'. > reassign 17624 dpkg-iwj Bug#17624: dpkg: installs regular dir when .deb contains symlink ! Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `dpkg-iwj'.

Re: removing gopher

1999-10-02 Thread Raul Miller
> > > 4. The package is not complete; the source also includes the gopher > > >server but there is no debian package. Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This was deliberate. [It's one thing to distribute a non-free client. > > It's another to distribute a non-free server.] On Fri, Oc