On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:23:10PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> 79 bugs presently tagged patched:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_0_2_4
> Yesterday I ran a for loop around all the xlibs-dev buggy packages,
> pbuiling with
79 bugs presently tagged patched:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_0_2_4
Yesterday I ran a for loop around all the xlibs-dev buggy packages,
pbuiling with s/xlibs-dev/$(xlibs-split)/. There were plenty of
failures, such as for
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 04:20:18PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:12:57PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > I'd like to be able to inspect the state of the system when configure
> > > is running. The buildd doesn't show me the command it is running. Is
> > > there a way I
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:34:00PM +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Marc Singer wrote:
> >I'd like to be able to inspect the state of the system when configure
> >is running. The buildd doesn't show me the command it is running. Is
> >there a way I can emulate it?
>
>
This one time, at band camp, Marc Singer wrote:
>I'd like to be able to inspect the state of the system when configure
>is running. The buildd doesn't show me the command it is running. Is
>there a way I can emulate it?
I get the buildds to cat config.log if the configure fails, like so:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 07:12:57PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I'd like to be able to inspect the state of the system when configure
> > is running. The buildd doesn't show me the command it is running. Is
> > there a way I can emulate it?
> You could sh -x ./configure, or check the config.lo
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:52:25AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:44:31PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:48:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Explanation for this problem is here:
> > >
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/200
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 01:44:31PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:48:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Explanation for this problem is here:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2005-09/msg00023.html
> >
> > Simple fix is to re-run autoconf on the pac
Marc Singer wrote:
> I don't think that this is valid. You don't know if a package uses
> autoconf.
Hey! I didn't even know what package it was LOL
Blind guessing...
> This wouldn't have helped in the case of this package. Rerunning
> autoconf didn't change the configure script. I updated it
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 12:25:47AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:17:06PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:57:01AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > > Marc Singer wrote:
> > > > I was wrong, the package does use autoconf. I'm not doing the build,
> > > > th
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 02:17:06PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:57:01AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > Marc Singer wrote:
> > > I was wrong, the package does use autoconf. I'm not doing the build,
> > > the autobuilder is.
> > Here is what vorlon tought me to do:
> > cd packag
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 03:57:01AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > I was wrong, the package does use autoconf. I'm not doing the build,
> > the autobuilder is.
>
> Here is what vorlon tought me to do:
>
> cd packagesrc-0.0/
> autoconf
I don't think that this is valid. You don't kn
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:48:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:29:44PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updat
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Here it is
Those are done between Amaya, Steve, and yours truly.
> #347146: xlbiff
> #346631: bbkeys
> #346630: blast
> #346613: canna
> #346617: jester
> #347138: nitpic
> #347109: stardict
> #346965: wmtimer
> #347118: wmload
> #347119: wmix
> #347042: qiv
waiting on ma
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:51:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > #347146: xlbiff
> Today I'll only get that one, but take the liberty to fix this:
> +Build-Depends: debhelper, libxaw7-dev (>> 4.0.3) (>> 4.0.3), xutils,
> libxt-dev, x-dev
> (The second >> is a leftover of
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> #347146: xlbiff
Today I'll only get that one, but take the liberty to fix this:
+Build-Depends: debhelper, libxaw7-dev (>> 4.0.3) (>> 4.0.3), xutils,
libxt-dev, x-dev
(The second >> is a leftover of the xlibs-dev...)
> I also note the following packages are "hard" to NMU, b
Here are some more bugs needing uploads. This list includes packages
which needed replacement direct dependencies, are tested in pbuilder,
and have no changes reported by debdiff save for some
version/size/depends stuff.
Build logs are all available at
http://justinpryzby.com/debian/xlibs-dev/
Marc Singer wrote:
>> You need to replace xlibs-dev dependency by the appropriate dev-packages
>> that it has been split up into (in the case of buici-clock, those
>> probably are libx11-dev, libxext-dev, x-dev).
>
> Already done. This new problem is due to the change. I used the
> proscribed scr
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:29:44PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
> > > reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being fou
Marc Singer wrote:
> I was wrong, the package does use autoconf. I'm not doing the build,
> the autobuilder is.
Here is what vorlon tought me to do:
cd packagesrc-0.0/
autoconf
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us -b
cd ..
pbuilder build package*dsc
Do you want me to test this for you and gener
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
> > reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking in
> > /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstandi
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:21:36AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > buici-clock
>
> > I guess I'm going to have to pull the s390 x11-dev package to look at
> > it.
>
> You need to replace xlibs-dev dependency by the appropriate dev-packages
> that it has been split up into
Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
> reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking in
> /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstanding another change in the X11
> libraries?
Maybe I'm missing something o
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:11:45PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:02:57AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> > Marc Singer wrote:
> > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
> >
> > Which one?
>
> buici-clock
>
> It builds on ix86, but I don't use a
Marc Singer wrote:
> buici-clock
> I guess I'm going to have to pull the s390 x11-dev package to look at
> it.
You need to replace xlibs-dev dependency by the appropriate dev-packages
that it has been split up into (in the case of buici-clock, those
probably are libx11-dev, libxext-dev, x-dev).
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:02:57AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
>
> Which one?
buici-clock
It builds on ix86, but I don't use a chroot jail for building.
>
> > reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being fo
Marc Singer wrote:
> I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
Which one?
> reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking
> in /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstanding another change in the X11
> libraries?
Does re-running autoconf help?
--
.
Amaya wrote:
>> 346760 maintainer has demands
> Just upload and orphan. He doesn't seem to want to do it himself.
Yeah, well. I prefered to do the more enthusiastic maintainers first.
And now I'm tired and testing xmms-jack moved me from bugs to Beethoven. :)
> Can we tag the bugs you already fixe
I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some
reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking
in /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstanding another change in the X11
libraries?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the update on the status of this.
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> 346760 maintainer has demands
Just upload and orphan. He doesn't seem to want to do it himself.
Can we tag the bugs you already fixed in an upload as "pending"?
This way it is much easier to keep track of the ones
Hi Justin,
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> 346622 346626 346646 346773 346827 346624 346634 346760 346795 347096
346622 fixed by maint
347096 fixed by maint
346827 uploaded (maint consent)
346624 uploaded (maint consent)
346634 uploaded
346795 uploaded
Not yet:
346646 346626 346773
346760 maintainer h
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Unfortunately my first round didn't use the script (though I was aware
> of it), and so many packages say "(no replacement needed)", even
> though they have a direct build-dep on some package which used to be
> depended on by xlibs-dev. So I'm going back through the bugs and
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:17:31PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Hi there, Justin
>
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Each of the bugs tagged patch has a short note with the necessary
> > change b-d.
>
> I intend to do this:
> http://paste.debian.net/3743
> And I am very interested in your work... I would like
Hi there, Justin
Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Each of the bugs tagged patch has a short note with the necessary
> change b-d.
I intend to do this:
http://paste.debian.net/3743
And I am very interested in your work... I would like to see a list of
those bugs, specifically the ones *you* fixed.
I am in
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:52:50PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:07:36AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> > Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > >Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
> > > PROTECTED]:transition
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 01:07:36AM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> >Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5
> >
> >I've gone and fi
Justin Pryzby wrote:
Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5
I've gone and figured out the updated dependences necessary for ~40 of
them to build. So any su
Packages with RC bugs due to the xlibs-dev transition are listed at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:transition-xlibs-dev&repeatmerged=no&tagexcl=patch#_2_2_5
I've gone and figured out the updated dependences necessary for ~40 of
them to build. So any sufficiently motivated QA
38 matches
Mail list logo
