On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:29:44PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some > > > reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking in > > > /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstanding another change in the X11 > > > libraries? > > Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but why would you want the package to > > be linking statically with libX11? Or did you mean libX11.so? > I don't think it is. I erroneously stated the reported error. The > compiler complained that it couldn't find -lX11. > c++ -g -lX11 -lXext -o o/xo o/ldisplay.o o/lwindow.o o/lfont.o o/wbutton.o > o/wtext.o o/wdialog.o > +o/lhash.o o/larray.o o/res.o o/dmalloc.o o/dither.o o/lpicture.o o/loupe.o > o/stats.o o/res_l.o o/res_y.o > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > Unfortunately, the reporter omitted the rest of the build log. The > autoconf script should have found the X11 library, but it looks like > it didn't. Explanation for this problem is here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2005-09/msg00023.html Simple fix is to re-run autoconf on the package, to pick up a new definition of the AC_PATH_X macro. Alternative fix is to add libxt-dev to the build-deps, even though libxt-dev isn't used for anything but the configure check. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
