On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:48:48PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:29:44PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:22:45PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Marc Singer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I'm getting a build failure on s390 for the updated package. For some > > > > reason, the libX11.a librarary isn't being found by ld. It's looking in > > > > /usr/X11R6/lib. Am I misunderstanding another change in the X11 > > > > libraries? > > > > Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but why would you want the package to > > > be linking statically with libX11? Or did you mean libX11.so? > > > I don't think it is. I erroneously stated the reported error. The > > compiler complained that it couldn't find -lX11. > > > c++ -g -lX11 -lXext -o o/xo o/ldisplay.o o/lwindow.o o/lfont.o > > o/wbutton.o o/wtext.o o/wdialog.o > > +o/lhash.o o/larray.o o/res.o o/dmalloc.o o/dither.o o/lpicture.o > > o/loupe.o o/stats.o o/res_l.o o/res_y.o > > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lX11 > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > Unfortunately, the reporter omitted the rest of the build log. The > > autoconf script should have found the X11 library, but it looks like > > it didn't. > > Explanation for this problem is here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2005-09/msg00023.html > > Simple fix is to re-run autoconf on the package, to pick up a new definition > of the AC_PATH_X macro. > > Alternative fix is to add libxt-dev to the build-deps, even though libxt-dev > isn't used for anything but the configure check.
thx. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
