500 error for "one year open bug history graph" png

2024-07-17 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi, Around "Wed 17 Jul 16:39:04 UTC 2024" I attempted to access my "one year open bug history graph" chart, and I received a 500 error. 'hope someone fixes it soon! Regards, Nicholas signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1028988: DDPO: Show open security issues (CVEs)

2023-01-15 Thread Samuel Henrique
Package: qa.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: fds, samuel...@debian.org Severity: wishlist The DDPO page could show open security vulnerabilities tracked on security-tracker.debian.org, just like we see it in tracker.d.o. Example for curl: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/curl

Re: Regarding how to join open source

2022-02-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, 2022-02-26 at 10:52 +0530, Anish Kumbhar wrote: > I am Anish Devendra Kumbhar, 1 st Year B.Tech student in CSE. > I know C and C++, and am learning web development and python.  > I am really curious to know about open source and its contribution process. > This will be my firs

Regarding how to join open source

2022-02-25 Thread Anish Kumbhar
Hi Sir/Madam, I am Anish Devendra Kumbhar, 1 st Year B.Tech student in CSE. I know C and C++, and am learning web development and python. I am really curious to know about open source and its contribution process. This will be my first experience with an open source project and its community, so

Bug#910426: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: Internal Server Error when trying to open the bugs for package linux)

2018-10-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:15:42 +0200 with message-id <20181006081540.gd20...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#910426: tracker.debian.org: Internal Server Error when trying to open the bugs for package linux has caused the Debian Bug report #910426, regarding tracker.debi

Bug#910426: tracker.debian.org: Internal Server Error when trying to open the bugs for package linux

2018-10-05 Thread Axel R.
Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux when I click on any of the links to the bug pages like https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=yes&src=linux I always get Internal Server Error. This works fine for other pa

Open

2017-07-18 Thread Sunzo Tao
ส่งจาก iPad ของฉัน

Processed: Re: Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 debbugs Bug #753683 [tracker.debian.org] Bug->package assignment does not work correctly Bug reassigned from package 'tracker.debian.org' to 'debbugs'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #753683 to the same values previously set Ignoring req

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-03 Thread Don Armstrong
Control: reassign -1 debbugs Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org Control: retitle -1 Bugs in binary packages which have migrated from one source package to another show up in the wrong source package On Wed, 03 Dec 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > > It

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ Reordering the paragraph ] On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > > So should I use "source" as a base and then restrict to the set of > > source packages available in "found_versions" (if any)? > > It depends on what you're using that field for. If you're using it to > show a set of bugs

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > > It would be nice if we could just use the "source" field instead of > > doing our own mapping bug the value of the "source" field doesn't make > > much sense to me... why does it list so many source packages and not > > only one like on > > https://bugs

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-01 Thread Don Armstrong
says: > > '1 bug tagged help in the BTS' > > While at the same time there is no open bug and indeed clicking on the '1 > > bug' link leads to [2] without a bug. > > > > Probably the tracker finds #591881 and doesn't realize that this is a

Processed: Re: Closing: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #753683 {Done: Christophe Siraut } [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #753683 to the same values previously set >

Bug#753683: Closing: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-12-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 Bug->package assignment does not work correctly On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Christophe Siraut wrote: > Thanks for reporting, Why are you closing this bug? I explained in my first answer that the behaviour of the tracker is not correct. I never got the expected ans

Bug#753683: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open)

2014-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:23:17 +0100 with message-id <20141201092317.GA6124@atitude.localdomain> and subject line Closing: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open has caused the Debian Bug report #753683, regarding tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged hel

Bug#756125: tracker.debian.org: update fails with too many open files

2014-07-26 Thread Christophe Siraut
83, in _get_apt_source_records cache = apt.cache.Cache(rootdir=self.cache_root_dir) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 102, in __init__ self.open(progress) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 147, in open self._records = a

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-07-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
[ Cc ow...@bugs.debian.org for a question ] On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Looking at [1] I find it strange, that it says: > '1 bug tagged help in the BTS' > While at the same time there is no open bug and indeed clicking on the '1 > bug'

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open

2014-07-04 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal Dear maintainer, thanks for the new package tracker. ;) Looking at [1] I find it strange, that it says: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS' While at the same time there is no open bug and indeed clicking on the '1 bug' link leads

Bug#588644: Bug still open?

2011-08-22 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi Giuseppe. Is this bug still relevant? Did it happen again or can we consider the faulty mirror fixed? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588644 Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...

Bug#609587: marked as done (qa.debian.org: PTS says 2 open security issues, security tracker says 0)

2011-01-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:36:53 -0600 with message-id <4d32056d.0a48960a.081b.5...@mx.google.com> and subject line Re: Bug#609587: qa.debian.org: PTS says 2 open security issues, security tracker says 0 has caused the Debian Bug report #609587, regarding qa.debian.org: PTS

Bug#609587: qa.debian.org: PTS says 2 open security issues, security tracker says 0

2011-01-10 Thread Olaf van der Spek
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, > There are 2 open security issues, please fix them. http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lighttpd.html > No Open issues http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/lighttpd Greetings, Olaf -- System Information: Debian Releas

Bug#583381: http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openswan.html reports wrong open security issue

2010-05-27 Thread Harald Jenny
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: minor http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openswan.html lists an open security issue for openswan while http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/openswan declares no open issues. "Simple" questions: Why does this happen and how can i

Re: Should security tracker and PTS track terminated oldstable security issue as open?

2010-04-14 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:02:05PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > Should security tracker and PTS track terminated oldstable security issue > as open? > > For exapmle, http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-5935 > only affects to etch, however it

Should security tracker and PTS track terminated oldstable security issue as open?

2010-04-14 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Should security tracker and PTS track terminated oldstable security issue as open? For exapmle, http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-5935 only affects to etch, however it and PTS says that is "open security issue" http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/texlive-bin.

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/03/09 at 22:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > Also, I'm working towards improving the Launchpad API to be able to also look > at Ubuntu's Queue: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/346491 > > I believe that's an useful tool for cross-distribution teams (i.e. Debian > Mono, > where we

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-23 Thread David Paleino
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:56:26 +0100 (CET), Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David Paleino wrote: > > > Aww... and I thought I had wrote an useful program. :( > > > > Neverminds, going back to my NEW gui (yes, NEW, the queue :) > > Might be the same here: I'm currently busy writing a NE

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David Paleino wrote: Aww... and I thought I had wrote an useful program. :( Neverminds, going back to my NEW gui (yes, NEW, the queue :) Might be the same here: I'm currently busy writing a NEW queue UDD gatherer. So at some point in time it might be better to base your

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-23 Thread David Paleino
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:38:42 -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/03/09 at 20:01 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > > Another approach would be using bts2ldap -- I once wrote a frontend in > > Gambas (see it in action at [1]). I haven't packaged it, and it was no more > > than a PoC code, but I could s

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/03/09 at 19:52 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > I would like fresh data, so I take > http://qa.debian.org/data/orphaned.txt and packages maintained by "QA > Group" on the local Packages file (updated frequently), so here are > some questions: For reference, most of the info about UDD is available

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/03/09 at 20:01 +0100, David Paleino wrote: > Another approach would be using bts2ldap -- I once wrote a frontend in Gambas > (see it in action at [1]). I haven't packaged it, and it was no more than a > PoC > code, but I could special-case "wnpp" and add a specific field for it. I don't > ha

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-22 Thread Raphael Geissert
Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs. >> >> I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it returns all the bugs >> ever

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-22 Thread David Paleino
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:52:55 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > I would like fresh data, so I take > http://qa.debian.org/data/orphaned.txt and packages maintained by "QA > Group" on the local Packages file (updated frequently), so here are > some questions: > > - is UDD querable by any host (my pc for

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-22 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 19:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/03/09 at 19:07 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > Hello, >> > I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs. >> > &g

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-22 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/03/09 at 19:07 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs. > > > > I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it ret

Re: Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-22 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello, > I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs. > > I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it returns all the bugs > ever reported (~2900) that's too much for the ~400

Python code to retrieve all open wnpp bugs

2009-03-22 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs. I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it returns all the bugs ever reported (~2900) that's too much for the ~400 we should have in open state. Maybe using bts2ldap service I might be

Re: gpdf: remove? security hole open for this long?

2006-07-22 Thread Junichi Uekawa
severity 334454 serious thanks To me, that patch as specified in 322467 is not applied, so from a casual reading, it looks like the security hole is open. At Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:04:31 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 23:49]:

Re: gpdf: remove? security hole open for this long?

2006-07-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 23:49]: > I think having a security hole for more than a year is a reason to remove > gpdf. > > evince seems to be a replacement, gpdf is deprecated. It should imho get orphaned first. BCCing the MIA people - what's up there anyway? Hasn't mecha

gpdf: remove? security hole open for this long?

2006-07-21 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, I think having a security hole for more than a year is a reason to remove gpdf. evince seems to be a replacement, gpdf is deprecated. regards, junichi -- [EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscrib

Bug#339724: marked as done (unsubscribing to bug reports from web page open to malicious use)

2006-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:49:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Unsubscription without confirmation is fine has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#339724: unsubscribing to bug reports from web page open to malicious use

2005-11-18 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Package: qa.debian.org Hi, I was surprised to discover that, when I attempted to unsubscribe myself from bug reports for a specific package, via the developer web-page, the action was committed immediately. The convention is for there to be a request of confirmation, as anyone could feasibly ente

Re: Bug#320594: bugs.debian.org: search for open bugs in unstable lists closed ones as outstanding

2005-07-31 Thread Arthur Korn
maintainer can do damn little to change anything about that. I'm somewhat annoyed by the prospect of having the BTS search results fill up with long-ago fixed issues, the PTS keeping to bich me about fixed issues and that nice bug graph and such things will probably list all those bugs as o

Bug#320594: bugs.debian.org: search for open bugs in unstable lists closed ones as outstanding

2005-07-30 Thread Arthur Korn
Package: bugs.debian.org Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi Have a look at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=devtodo&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable This is what the form at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ came up with when I selected search for:

Processed: [jrv@kosh.mitre.org: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages]]

2003-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages Bug reassigned from package `qa.debian.org' to `ftp.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#204547: [jrv@kosh.mitre.org: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages]]

2003-09-10 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org thanks - Forwarded message from Jim Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Jim Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages] Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:35:20 -0400 To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAI

Processed: Re: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages

2003-09-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 204547 qa.debian.org Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: Re: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages

2003-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages Bug reassigned from package `qa.debian.org' to `ftp.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages

2003-09-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org thanks I wanted someone else to comment, but I think it's fairly clear anyway. * tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-10 13:23]: > * James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 19:04]: > > > All the open-amulet packages are o

Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages

2003-09-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 19:04]: > > All the open-amulet packages are orphaned, they have no reverse > > dependencies, and upstream hasn't been active for a couple of years. If > > someone wants a C++ GUI library, they should use something like QT

Processed: Re: please remove open-amulet and related packages

2003-09-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 204547 qa.debian.org Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'. > thanks control Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Re: Open bugs of ssh2

2002-12-29 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Martin! You wrote: > Can someone go through them and check if they apply to openssh; if yes, > reassign; otherwise, close with a message that ssh2 is gone and that > OpenSSH should be used. Done. None of the bugs seem to apply to openssh, so I closed them all. -- Kind regards, +---

Open bugs of ssh2

2002-12-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
ssh-nonfree and ssh2 have been removed from Debian (see #149896) with consensus from debian-qa [0]. However, there are many open bugs. Can someone go through them and check if they apply to openssh; if yes, reassign; otherwise, close with a message that ssh2 is gone and that OpenSSH should be

Bug#94892: marked as done (libXaw error when open() returns fd 0)

2001-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:34:25 +0200 From: Massimo Dal Zotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: libXaw error when open() returns fd 0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:34:24 +0200 (MEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)] MIM

Bug#123029: kamera 4:2.2.2-4.1 attempts to open a version of libusb that isnt available.

2001-12-09 Thread gareth
Package: kamera Version: 4:2.2.2-4.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux blackoil 2.4.16 #17 Fri Nov 30 22:05:56 PST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kamera depends on: ii gp

Bug#122050: marked as done (kghostview: cannot open ps/pdf (SIGSEGV))

2001-12-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2001 22:12:20 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#122050: kghostview: cannot open ps/pdf (SIGSEGV) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#122050: kghostview: cannot open ps/pdf (SIGSEGV)

2001-12-01 Thread Raphael Derosso Pereira - DephiNit
Package: kghostview Version: 4:2.1.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable It just breaks... here the backtrace... 0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x40db31f0 in __check_rhosts_file () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x4056a

Bug#118523: kamera: kcontrol crashes when trying to open the kamera config window with the message: kcontrol: relocation error: /usr/lib/libkcm_kamera.so: undefined symbol: gp_init

2001-11-06 Thread Scott Eisert
Package: kamera Version: 4:2.2.1.0-2.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux rodeo 2.4.14 #1 Tue Nov 6 10:45:30 EST 2001 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages kamera depends

Re: Emacs 19: open bugs

2001-04-22 Thread Edward Betts
Ivo Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I will be going over the list of bugs. It may take a while though > > before I've had them all, I will keep you posted. > > Thanks to Jaakko, we have this list: > > 37 bugs can be closed, because they are not relevant to the current >package, hav

Re: Emacs 19: open bugs

2001-04-22 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Ivo Timmermans wrote: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > If someone could do that, I'd appreciate it; just reply and say you're > > working on it. Thanks for your help. > > I will be going over the list of bugs. It may take a while though > before I've had them all, I will keep you posted. Thanks to

Re: Emacs 19: open bugs

2001-04-21 Thread Ivo Timmermans
Martin Michlmayr wrote: > If someone could do that, I'd appreciate it; just reply and say you're > working on it. Thanks for your help. I will be going over the list of bugs. It may take a while though before I've had them all, I will keep you posted. Ivo -- Hey, it compiles! Ship i

Emacs 19: open bugs

2001-04-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Emacs 19 has been removed from Debian unstable a while ago; however, many bugs are still open. Someone has to go through the bug list, check if the errors apply to Emacs 20 and then either reassign the bug to emacs20 or close it with a note saying to switch to Emacs 20. Since I don't use

Bug#16041: xpostitplus: file->open segfault

1997-12-17 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Package: xpostitplus Version: 2.3.1-3 In a postit if I press the button file and then open I get segfault. -- System Information Debian Release: 1.3 Kernel Version: Linux arca 2.1.72 #3 Wed Dec 10 20:36:17 CET 1997 i586 unknown Versions of the packages xpostitplus depends on: libc6 Version