Hi,
Around "Wed 17 Jul 16:39:04 UTC 2024" I attempted to access my "one year
open bug history graph" chart, and I received a 500 error.
'hope someone fixes it soon!
Regards,
Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: qa.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: fds, samuel...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
The DDPO page could show open security vulnerabilities tracked on
security-tracker.debian.org, just like we see it in tracker.d.o.
Example for curl:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/curl
On Sat, 2022-02-26 at 10:52 +0530, Anish Kumbhar wrote:
> I am Anish Devendra Kumbhar, 1 st Year B.Tech student in CSE.
> I know C and C++, and am learning web development and python.
> I am really curious to know about open source and its contribution process.
> This will be my firs
Hi Sir/Madam,
I am Anish Devendra Kumbhar, 1 st Year B.Tech student in CSE.
I know C and C++, and am learning web development and python.
I am really curious to know about open source and its contribution process.
This will be my first experience with an open source project and its
community, so
Your message dated Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:15:42 +0200
with message-id <20181006081540.gd20...@mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#910426: tracker.debian.org: Internal Server Error when
trying to open the bugs for package linux
has caused the Debian Bug report #910426,
regarding tracker.debi
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux when I click on any of the links to the
bug pages like
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=yes&src=linux I
always get Internal Server Error. This works fine for other pa
ส่งจาก iPad ของฉัน
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debbugs
Bug #753683 [tracker.debian.org] Bug->package assignment does not work correctly
Bug reassigned from package 'tracker.debian.org' to 'debbugs'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #753683 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring req
Control: reassign -1 debbugs
Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 Bugs in binary packages which have migrated from one source
package to another show up in the wrong source package
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > It
[ Reordering the paragraph ]
On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > So should I use "source" as a base and then restrict to the set of
> > source packages available in "found_versions" (if any)?
>
> It depends on what you're using that field for. If you're using it to
> show a set of bugs
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > It would be nice if we could just use the "source" field instead of
> > doing our own mapping bug the value of the "source" field doesn't make
> > much sense to me... why does it list so many source packages and not
> > only one like on
> > https://bugs
says:
> > '1 bug tagged help in the BTS'
> > While at the same time there is no open bug and indeed clicking on the '1
> > bug' link leads to [2] without a bug.
> >
> > Probably the tracker finds #591881 and doesn't realize that this is a
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #753683 {Done: Christophe Siraut } [tracker.debian.org]
tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #753683 to the same values
previously set
>
Control: reopen -1
Control: retitle -1 Bug->package assignment does not work correctly
On Mon, 01 Dec 2014, Christophe Siraut wrote:
> Thanks for reporting,
Why are you closing this bug?
I explained in my first answer that the behaviour of the tracker is not
correct. I never got the expected ans
Your message dated Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:23:17 +0100
with message-id <20141201092317.GA6124@atitude.localdomain>
and subject line Closing: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open
has caused the Debian Bug report #753683,
regarding tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged hel
83, in _get_apt_source_records
cache = apt.cache.Cache(rootdir=self.cache_root_dir)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 102, in __init__
self.open(progress)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 147, in open
self._records = a
[ Cc ow...@bugs.debian.org for a question ]
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Looking at [1] I find it strange, that it says:
> '1 bug tagged help in the BTS'
> While at the same time there is no open bug and indeed clicking on the '1
> bug'
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
thanks for the new package tracker. ;)
Looking at [1] I find it strange, that it says:
'1 bug tagged help in the BTS'
While at the same time there is no open bug and indeed clicking on the
'1 bug' link leads
Hi Giuseppe.
Is this bug still relevant? Did it happen again or can we consider the
faulty mirror fixed?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588644
Giovanni.
--
Giovanni Mascellani
Pisa, Italy
Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...
Your message dated Sat, 15 Jan 2011 14:36:53 -0600
with message-id <4d32056d.0a48960a.081b.5...@mx.google.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#609587: qa.debian.org: PTS says 2 open security
issues, security tracker says 0
has caused the Debian Bug report #609587,
regarding qa.debian.org: PTS
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
> There are 2 open security issues, please fix them.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lighttpd.html
> No Open issues
http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/lighttpd
Greetings,
Olaf
-- System Information:
Debian Releas
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
http://packages.qa.debian.org/o/openswan.html lists an open security issue for
openswan
while http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/openswan
declares no
open issues. "Simple" questions: Why does this happen and how can i
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:02:05PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should security tracker and PTS track terminated oldstable security issue
> as open?
>
> For exapmle, http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-5935
> only affects to etch, however it
Hi,
Should security tracker and PTS track terminated oldstable security issue
as open?
For exapmle, http://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-5935
only affects to etch, however it and PTS says that is "open security issue"
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/texlive-bin.
On 23/03/09 at 22:13 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Also, I'm working towards improving the Launchpad API to be able to also look
> at Ubuntu's Queue:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/346491
>
> I believe that's an useful tool for cross-distribution teams (i.e. Debian
> Mono,
> where we
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:56:26 +0100 (CET), Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David Paleino wrote:
>
> > Aww... and I thought I had wrote an useful program. :(
> >
> > Neverminds, going back to my NEW gui (yes, NEW, the queue :)
>
> Might be the same here: I'm currently busy writing a NE
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, David Paleino wrote:
Aww... and I thought I had wrote an useful program. :(
Neverminds, going back to my NEW gui (yes, NEW, the queue :)
Might be the same here: I'm currently busy writing a NEW queue UDD
gatherer. So at some point in time it might be better to base
your
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:38:42 -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/03/09 at 20:01 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > Another approach would be using bts2ldap -- I once wrote a frontend in
> > Gambas (see it in action at [1]). I haven't packaged it, and it was no more
> > than a PoC code, but I could s
On 22/03/09 at 19:52 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I would like fresh data, so I take
> http://qa.debian.org/data/orphaned.txt and packages maintained by "QA
> Group" on the local Packages file (updated frequently), so here are
> some questions:
For reference, most of the info about UDD is available
On 22/03/09 at 20:01 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Another approach would be using bts2ldap -- I once wrote a frontend in Gambas
> (see it in action at [1]). I haven't packaged it, and it was no more than a
> PoC
> code, but I could special-case "wnpp" and add a specific field for it. I don't
> ha
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs.
>>
>> I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it returns all the bugs
>> ever
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:52:55 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I would like fresh data, so I take
> http://qa.debian.org/data/orphaned.txt and packages maintained by "QA
> Group" on the local Packages file (updated frequently), so here are
> some questions:
>
> - is UDD querable by any host (my pc for
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 19:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/03/09 at 19:07 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs.
>> >
&g
On 22/03/09 at 19:07 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs.
> >
> > I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it ret
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 17:37, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs.
>
> I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it returns all the bugs
> ever reported (~2900) that's too much for the ~400
Hello,
I'm looking for a way from python code to obtain all the open wnpp bugs.
I try to use btsutils (query('pkg:wnpp')), but it returns all the bugs
ever reported (~2900) that's too much for the ~400 we should have in
open state.
Maybe using bts2ldap service I might be
severity 334454 serious
thanks
To me, that patch as specified in 322467 is not applied, so from a
casual reading, it looks like the security hole is open.
At Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:04:31 +0200,
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> * Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 23:49]:
* Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-21 23:49]:
> I think having a security hole for more than a year is a reason to remove
> gpdf.
>
> evince seems to be a replacement, gpdf is deprecated.
It should imho get orphaned first. BCCing the MIA people - what's up
there anyway? Hasn't mecha
Hi,
I think having a security hole for more than a year is a reason to remove
gpdf.
evince seems to be a replacement, gpdf is deprecated.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
Your message dated Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:49:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Unsubscription without confirmation is fine
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: qa.debian.org
Hi,
I was surprised to discover that, when I attempted to unsubscribe myself
from bug reports for a specific package, via the developer web-page, the
action was committed immediately. The convention is for there to be a
request of confirmation, as anyone could feasibly ente
maintainer can do damn
little to change anything about that.
I'm somewhat annoyed by the prospect of having the BTS search
results fill up with long-ago fixed issues, the PTS keeping to
bich me about fixed issues and that nice bug graph and such
things will probably list all those bugs as o
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi
Have a look at:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=devtodo&archive=no&version=&dist=unstable
This is what the form at
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
came up with when I selected
search for:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org
Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages
Bug reassigned from package `qa.debian.org' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org
thanks
- Forwarded message from Jim Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jim Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages]
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 21:35:20 -0400
To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 204547 qa.debian.org
Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org
Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages
Bug reassigned from package `qa.debian.org' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
reassign 204547 ftp.debian.org
thanks
I wanted someone else to comment, but I think it's fairly clear
anyway.
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-10 13:23]:
> * James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 19:04]:
> > > All the open-amulet packages are o
* James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-07 19:04]:
> > All the open-amulet packages are orphaned, they have no reverse
> > dependencies, and upstream hasn't been active for a couple of years. If
> > someone wants a C++ GUI library, they should use something like QT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 204547 qa.debian.org
Bug#204547: please remove open-amulet and related packages
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.
> thanks control
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Hi Martin!
You wrote:
> Can someone go through them and check if they apply to openssh; if yes,
> reassign; otherwise, close with a message that ssh2 is gone and that
> OpenSSH should be used.
Done. None of the bugs seem to apply to openssh, so I closed them all.
--
Kind regards,
+---
ssh-nonfree and ssh2 have been removed from Debian (see #149896) with
consensus from debian-qa [0]. However, there are many open bugs. Can
someone go through them and check if they apply to openssh; if yes,
reassign; otherwise, close with a message that ssh2 is gone and that
OpenSSH should be
EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:34:25 +0200
From: Massimo Dal Zotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libXaw error when open() returns fd 0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:34:24 +0200 (MEST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIM
Package: kamera
Version: 4:2.2.2-4.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux blackoil 2.4.16 #17 Fri Nov 30 22:05:56 PST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages kamera depends on:
ii gp
Your message dated Sat, 1 Dec 2001 22:12:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#122050: kghostview: cannot open ps/pdf (SIGSEGV)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: kghostview
Version: 4:2.1.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It just breaks... here the backtrace...
0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#0 0x40d3a8f9 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x40db31f0 in __check_rhosts_file () from /lib/libc.so.6
#2 0x4056a
Package: kamera
Version: 4:2.2.1.0-2.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rodeo 2.4.14 #1 Tue Nov 6 10:45:30 EST 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages kamera depends
Ivo Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will be going over the list of bugs. It may take a while though
> > before I've had them all, I will keep you posted.
>
> Thanks to Jaakko, we have this list:
>
> 37 bugs can be closed, because they are not relevant to the current
>package, hav
Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > If someone could do that, I'd appreciate it; just reply and say you're
> > working on it. Thanks for your help.
>
> I will be going over the list of bugs. It may take a while though
> before I've had them all, I will keep you posted.
Thanks to
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> If someone could do that, I'd appreciate it; just reply and say you're
> working on it. Thanks for your help.
I will be going over the list of bugs. It may take a while though
before I've had them all, I will keep you posted.
Ivo
--
Hey, it compiles! Ship i
Emacs 19 has been removed from Debian unstable a while ago; however,
many bugs are still open. Someone has to go through the bug list,
check if the errors apply to Emacs 20 and then either reassign the bug
to emacs20 or close it with a note saying to switch to Emacs 20.
Since I don't use
Package: xpostitplus
Version: 2.3.1-3
In a postit if I press the button file and then open I get segfault.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 1.3
Kernel Version: Linux arca 2.1.72 #3 Wed Dec 10 20:36:17 CET 1997 i586 unknown
Versions of the packages xpostitplus depends on:
libc6 Version
62 matches
Mail list logo