Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-28 Thread Alexander Winston
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 11:06, Ron Murray wrote: > At Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:04:16 +, > Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [1 ] > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > > > On Wed, N

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-27 Thread Ron Murray
At Wed, 26 Nov 2003 17:10:33 +0100, Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >The only other terminal program with tabs that I know of is > > powershell, which works and is, IMHO, better than gnome-terminal in > > its current incarnation. > > konsole My point exactly. -- Ron Murray

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-27 Thread Holger Schurig
>The only other terminal program with tabs that I know of is > powershell, which works and is, IMHO, better than gnome-terminal in > its current incarnation. konsole -- Try Linux 2.6 from BitKeeper for PXA2x0 CPUs at http://www.mn-logistik.de/unsupported/linux-2.6/

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-26 Thread Ron Murray
At Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:04:16 +, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [1 ] > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > >

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-26 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 01:04:16PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > What about plain old gnome-terminal? It supports tabs... > > It's had the gnome2 castration ("configuration is bad"), and is now > unusable. > Uhm, I'm using it now under wmaker. Probably it's better to use gnome programs

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-25 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no > > > reverse depends. > > > > > > Only

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-21 Thread Martin Quinson
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no > > > reverse depends. > > > > > > Only

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-21 Thread Graham Wilson
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no > > reverse depends. > > > > Only issue is that we released it with woody. > > > > Are there any objections

Re: Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-21 Thread Martin Quinson
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no > reverse depends. > > Only issue is that we released it with woody. > > Are there any objections to removing it from sid/testing? Err, that's a bad argument, but I use it...

Let's remove multi-gnome-terminal

2003-11-19 Thread Peter Palfrader
multi-gnome-terminal has several important bugs and no reverse depends. Only issue is that we released it with woody. Are there any objections to removing it from sid/testing? Peter -- PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** messages preferred.| : :' : The univ